Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 146 reviews
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric vs Michelin Primacy MXM4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 146 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Asymmetric is ahead, 71–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 1 test Owners 54 · 10 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Level73Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 87 Reviews found online 77 51 Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 73
Primacy MXM4: 60% × 87.1 + 40% × 51.1 = 73
No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
77
Wet
Eagle F1 Asymmetric +2057Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 75 (est.) 57 Reviews found online 79 57 Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 75.3 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 77
Primacy MXM4: 60% × 56.7 + 40% × 57.1 = 57
No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Snow
Eagle F1 Asymmetric +957Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 63 47 Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 66
Primacy MXM4: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.3 = 57
No road tests of snow for Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Primacy MXM4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
69
Comfort
Eagle F1 Asymmetric +1554Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 63 Reviews found online 69 47 Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 69.1 = 69
Primacy MXM4: 40% × 63.4 + 60% × 47.3 = 54
No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Noise
Primacy MXM4 +1075Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 64 ≈ 66 (est.) Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.9 = 65
Primacy MXM4: 60% × 80.8 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 75
No road tests of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Primacy MXM4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
63
Treadwear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric +162Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 61 59 Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 63
Primacy MXM4: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Primacy MXM4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
73
Handling (owners)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric +2449Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric Primacy MXM4 Reviews found online 73 49 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison55Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric | Michelin Primacy MXM4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 62 |
| Dry | 73 | 73 |
| Wet | 77 | 57 |
| Snow | 66 | 57 |
| Comfort | 69 | 54 |
| Noise | 65 | 75 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 73 | 49 |
| Efficiency | – | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric
Primacy MXM4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Eagle F1 Asymmetric | Primacy MXM4 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/8 2012 Auto Bild 20 inch Tyre Test | #4/3 2024 AutoView All-Season Tire Test R18 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Eagle F1 Asymmetric
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction, inspiring high confidence in corners and heavy rain
- Precise steering response and excellent road feedback near the limit
- Noticeably improved ride comfort and reduced road noise compared to rivals like Pirelli and Bridgestone
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear and shorter lifespan, particularly under spirited driving
- Poor performance and hazardous lack of grip in freezing temperatures, snow, or ice as a dedicated summer tire
- Prone to increased road noise, cupping, or tramlining as the tread wears down past halfway
Tire B Primacy MXM4
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and vibration dampening
- Strong tread life and durability
- High fuel efficiency
Cons
- Mediocre dry grip and handling precision
- Noticeable understeer when cornering
- Soft sidewalls that lack steering feedback
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric | B · Michelin Primacy MXM4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 11 | 2 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 20″ | 18″ |
| Tread depth | 8 - 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 240 - 300 A - AA A | 420 - 500 AA - B A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric
Michelin Primacy MXM4
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric — better handling, wet and comfort. Pick the Michelin Primacy MXM4 if noise matters most to you. Michelin Primacy MXM4 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric scores 73 vs 49 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric scores 77 vs 57 on wet.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric scores 69 vs 54 on comfort.
Michelin Primacy MXM4 scores 75 vs 65 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric or Primacy MXM4?
Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 Asymmetric or Primacy MXM4?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric, 77 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 Asymmetric or Primacy MXM4?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 73 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Eagle F1 Asymmetric or Primacy MXM4?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric, 66 vs 57 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Eagle F1 Asymmetric or Primacy MXM4?
Michelin Primacy MXM4, 75 vs 65 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 Asymmetric or Primacy MXM4?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric, 69 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 Asymmetric or Primacy MXM4?
Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 62 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology