Tests – · none yet Owners 53 · 16 reviews
Continental ContiSportContact 3 vs Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Ventus V12 evo2 is ahead, 69–61
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 67 · 93 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
63
Dry
Ventus V12 evo2 +871Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 Ventus V12 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 61 71 ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 63
Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 70.5 = 71
No road tests of dry for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
65
Wet
Ventus V12 evo2 +570Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 Ventus V12 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) 69 Reviews found online 63 72 ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 65
Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 69.2 + 40% × 71.8 = 70
No road tests of wet for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
44
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 Ventus V12 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) – Reviews found online 27 – ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 55.8 (est.) + 40% × 27.3 = 44
No road tests of snow for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
61
Comfort
Ventus V12 evo2 +667Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 Ventus V12 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 53 66 ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.6 = 61
Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67
No road tests of comfort for ContiSportContact 3 or Ventus V12 evo2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Noise
Ventus V12 evo2 +1273Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 Ventus V12 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 51 ≈ 67 (est.) ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.8 = 61
Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 73
No road tests of noise for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus V12 evo2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
56
Treadwear
Ventus V12 evo2 +763Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 Ventus V12 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 49 60 ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 49.4 = 56
Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 60.3 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus V12 evo2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
55
Handling (owners)
Ventus V12 evo2 +1469Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 Ventus V12 evo2 Reviews found online 55 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSportContact 3 | Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 69 |
| Dry | 63 | 71 |
| Wet | 65 | 70 |
| Snow | 44 | – |
| Comfort | 61 | 67 |
| Noise | 61 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 55 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ContiSportContact 3
Ventus V12 evo2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiSportContact 3
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Ventus V12 evo2
Pros
- Excellent value and cost-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands
- Strong, reliable grip in both dry and wet conditions with good aquaplaning resistance
- Comfortable ride with low initial road noise
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can cause a floaty feel or roll during aggressive cornering and track use
- Road noise increases noticeably as the tires wear down
- Treadwear is relatively fast, leading to shorter overall mileage
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSportContact 3 | B · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 22 | 38 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 15″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 280 A - B A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiSportContact 3
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
Winner: Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — better handling, noise and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiSportContact 3 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 69 vs 55 on handling.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 73 vs 61 on noise.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 71 vs 63 on dry.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 63 vs 56 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology