Tests – · none yet Owners 50 · 14 reviews
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR vs Continental ContiProContact — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 79 owner reviews. How we score
ContiProContact is ahead, 65–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 79 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
58
Dry
ContiProContact +967Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR ContiProContact Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 52 67 ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 58
ContiProContact: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67
No road tests of dry for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
63
Wet
ContiProContact +265Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR ContiProContact Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 60 63 ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 60 = 63
ContiProContact: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 65
No road tests of wet for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
56
Snow
ContiProContact +662Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR ContiProContact Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 48 56 ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.5 = 56
ContiProContact: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 62
No road tests of snow for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
50
Comfort
ContiProContact +1262Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR ContiProContact Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 40 59 ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 40% × 63.8 (est.) + 60% × 40.4 = 50
ContiProContact: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 59 = 62
No road tests of comfort for ContiSportContact 5 SSR or ContiProContact. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
62
Noise
ContiProContact +668Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR ContiProContact Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 56 70 ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 56.2 = 62
ContiProContact: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 68
No road tests of noise for ContiSportContact 5 SSR or ContiProContact. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
50
Treadwear
ContiProContact +1262Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR ContiProContact Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 40 60 ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 56.9 (est.) + 40% × 39.6 = 50
ContiProContact: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison63Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR ContiProContact Reviews found online – 63
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR | Continental ContiProContact |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 65 |
| Dry | 58 | 67 |
| Wet | 63 | 65 |
| Snow | 56 | 62 |
| Comfort | 50 | 62 |
| Noise | 62 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 50 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ContiSportContact 5 SSR
ContiProContact
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiSportContact 5 SSR
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B ContiProContact
Pros
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
- Low road noise
- Strong dry and wet grip for most drivers
Cons
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to impact bubbles and damage from potholes
- Some complaints about poor wet traction and braking performance
- Faster-than-expected tread wear or chipping reported by a minority of users
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR | B · Continental ContiProContact |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer tire | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 25 | 56 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 20″ | 15″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 9 - 12/32″ |
| UTQG | 280 - 420 A - AA A | 400 - 540 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 44 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 12 | 12 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR
Continental ContiProContact
Winner: Continental ContiProContact — better comfort, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ContiProContact scores 62 vs 50 on comfort.
Continental ContiProContact scores 62 vs 50 on treadwear.
Continental ContiProContact scores 67 vs 58 on dry.
Continental ContiProContact scores 62 vs 56 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiSportContact 5 SSR or ContiProContact?
Which is better in the wet, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or ContiProContact?
Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 65 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or ContiProContact?
Continental ContiProContact, 67 vs 58 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or ContiProContact?
Continental ContiProContact, 62 vs 56 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or ContiProContact?
Continental ContiProContact, 68 vs 62 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or ContiProContact?
Continental ContiProContact, 62 vs 50 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or ContiProContact?
Continental ContiProContact, 62 vs 50 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology