Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 14 reviews
Head-to-head
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: ContiSportContact 5 SSR 57, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat 56.
Check price on Amazon · ContiSportContact 5 SSR Check price on Amazon · Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 10 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
57
Dry
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat +158Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 51 53 ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 51.1 = 57
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.5 = 58
No road tests of dry for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
62
Wet
ContiSportContact 5 SSR +557Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 59 52 ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 62
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 51.8 = 57
No road tests of wet for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
56
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) – Reviews found online 46 – ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 46.4 = 56
No road tests of snow for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
49
Comfort
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat +150Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 39 41 ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 40% × 62.8 (est.) + 60% × 39 = 49
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat: 40% × 63.1 (est.) + 60% × 40.5 = 50
No road tests of comfort for ContiSportContact 5 SSR or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
62
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 56 – ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.5 = 62
No road tests of noise for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
50
Treadwear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat +454Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 40 46 ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 56.7 (est.) + 40% × 39.5 = 50
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 45.6 = 54
No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 57 | 56 |
| Dry | 57 | 58 |
| Wet | 62 | 57 |
| Snow | 56 | – |
| Comfort | 49 | 50 |
| Noise | 62 | – |
| Treadwear | 50 | 54 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
57
/ 100
ContiSportContact 5 SSR
56
/ 100
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer tire | Summer tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 25 | — |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 280 - 420 A - AA A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
57
/ 100
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR
56
/ 100
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat
Too close to call: Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR is stronger on wet. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat is stronger on treadwear. Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR scores 62 vs 57 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat scores 54 vs 50 on treadwear.
Tire A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiSportContact 5 SSR or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat?
Which is better in the wet, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat?
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR, 62 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat?
Neither, by our numbers: 57 vs 58 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat?
Neither, by our numbers: 49 vs 50 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat, 54 vs 50 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology