Tests 76 · 1 test Owners 48 · 39 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test (dry braking)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 2 road tests and 39 + 20 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV leads, 66–62 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 76 · 1 test Owners 48 · 39 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test (dry braking)
Tests 75 · 2 tests Owners 58 · 20 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test (wet braking)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | ContiSportContact 5 SUV | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests | 79 | 73 |
| Reviews found online | 55 | 62 |
ContiSportContact 5 SUV: 60% × 78.5 + 40% × 54.9 = 69
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 61.9 = 68
| Source | ContiSportContact 5 SUV | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests | 76 | 76 |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 65 |
ContiSportContact 5 SUV: 60% × 75.6 + 40% × 60.3 = 69
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 60% × 76.4 + 40% × 65.4 = 72
| Source | ContiSportContact 5 SUV | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 64 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 45 | 57 |
ContiSportContact 5 SUV: 40% × 63.9 (est.) + 60% × 45.2 = 53
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 56.8 = 61
No road tests of comfort for ContiSportContact 5 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Ventus S1 evo2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | ContiSportContact 5 SUV | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 71 | – |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | – |
ContiSportContact 5 SUV: 60% × 70.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 69
No owner ratings of noise for ContiSportContact 5 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | ContiSportContact 5 SUV | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 52 (est.) | ≈ 60 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 28 | 47 |
ContiSportContact 5 SUV: 60% × 52.5 (est.) + 40% × 27.7 = 43
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 47.3 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportContact 5 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus S1 evo2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | ContiSportContact 5 SUV | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 58 | 61 |
| Source | ContiSportContact 5 SUV | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 73 | – |
| Category | Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV | Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 66 |
| Dry | 69 | 68 |
| Wet | 69 | 72 |
| Comfort | 53 | 61 |
| Noise | 69 | – |
| Treadwear | 43 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 58 | 61 |
| Efficiency | 73 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ContiSportContact 5 SUV
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV finished ahead 1 times and Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | ContiSportContact 5 SUV | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 100% #1/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 99% #4/10 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% #1/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 99% #2/10 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 99% #2/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 100% #1/10 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% #1/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 100% #1/10 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #1/7 | #7/7 | – | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2016 Autobild 4x4 / SUV Tyre Test · 255/55 R19 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV | B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 38 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 22″ |
| UTQG | — | 220 - 420 A - AA A |
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
Narrow edge: Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV — better treadwear, comfort and wet. Where the Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV scores 55 vs 43 on treadwear.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV scores 61 vs 53 on comfort.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV scores 72 vs 69 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV, 72 vs 69 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV, 61 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV, 55 vs 43 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology