Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 27 reviews
Continental ContiSportContact 5 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 12 road tests and 27 + 5,819 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 leads, 71–67 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 74 · 12 tests Owners 69 · 5,819 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test (dry braking)
“I've got just that on my coupe and love the tyres! massive difference from my fk453s that I have on my csl reps. took 300ish miles to properly bead in but now they're brilliant!”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 +774Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 67 72 ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 67
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 71.9 = 74
No road tests of dry for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
72
Wet
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 +779Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 80 Reviews found online 72 77 ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 72
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 80.3 + 40% × 76.5 = 79
No road tests of wet for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Snow
ContiSportContact 5 +1158Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 68 51 ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.5 = 69
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 51 = 58
No road tests of snow for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
64
Comfort
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 +872Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 62 74 ContiSportContact 5: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 62.1 = 64
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 40% × 69.9 (est.) + 60% × 73.5 = 72
No road tests of comfort for ContiSportContact 5 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Noise
ContiSportContact 5 +169Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 64 Reviews found online 75 76 ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 75 = 70
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 63.5 + 40% × 76.3 = 69
No road tests of noise for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
56
Treadwear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 +1268Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 50 66 ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 60.5 (est.) + 40% × 50 = 56
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 70.1 + 40% × 65.8 = 68
No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison74Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Reviews found online – 74 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison75Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests – 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSportContact 5 | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 71 |
| Dry | 67 | 74 |
| Wet | 72 | 79 |
| Snow | 69 | 58 |
| Comfort | 64 | 72 |
| Noise | 70 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 68 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 74 |
| Efficiency | – | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ContiSportContact 5
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiSportContact 5
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and compliance over bumps
- Low road noise levels, especially compared to OEM or competitor alternatives
- Strong wet and dry grip for everyday and spirited driving
Cons
- Softer sidewalls lead to a somewhat mushy or less precise steering feel when pushed hard
- Faster-than-expected tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
- Vulnerability to sidewall damage, bubbles, or punctures from potholes
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental ContiSportContact 5
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Community members frequently consider the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 as an affordable alternative when replacing factory run-flats, praising its handling, low road noise, and strong grip compared to earlier tires. However, sentiment is tempered by criticism of its poor snow capability as a summer tire, complaints about the RunOnFlat variant from performance car owners, and mixed tread wear reports compared to rivals like Michelin.
“Originally Posted By: slacktide_bitog DTD has their memorial day sale, and the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 is $132 each, plus $200 in rebates. If you open up a DTD credit card, there is another $100 $50 rebate available (making the total $300 $250 off) I made a slight mistake, sorry But still, $200 or $250 off the set of four tires is a great deal”
“Hi I am having a set of these fitted tomorrow. They are the same sizes as yours. The total cost will be £366 including fitting and balancing. I am using a Formula One Autocentre. I don't know if there is one in your area but it would be worth having a look. Hope this helps.”
“Most recent 3 tyres for me: Current at >40,000km - Bridgestone Potenza RE003 ~20,000km - Michelin Pilot Sport 4 ~35,000km - Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 The Pilot Sport 4 has been my favourite of the three by far - handling felt just as good as the Goodyear Eagle F1 whilst having less road noise and incredible wet grip, but they just didn't last long. But I enjoyed them so much I'll try the Pilot Sport 5's next as they supposedly have improvements to tread wear.”
Based on 32 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 86 | 39 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 8 - 10/32″ | 7 - 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 280 - 420 A - AA A | 240 - 300 AA A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 42 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 22 | 22 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiSportContact 5
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Narrow edge: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 — better treadwear, comfort and dry. Pick the Continental ContiSportContact 5 if snow matters most to you.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 68 vs 56 on treadwear.
Continental ContiSportContact 5 scores 69 vs 58 on snow.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 72 vs 64 on comfort.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 74 vs 67 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiSportContact 5 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3?
Which is better in the wet, ContiSportContact 5 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, 79 vs 72 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportContact 5 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, 74 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ContiSportContact 5 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3?
Continental ContiSportContact 5, 69 vs 58 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, ContiSportContact 5 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, ContiSportContact 5 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, 72 vs 64 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiSportContact 5 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, 68 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology