Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiSportContact 5 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 12 road tests and 27 + 5,819 owner reviews. How we score

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 leads, 71–67 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
± 5

Tests 74 · 12 tests Owners 69 · 5,819 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test (dry braking)

“I've got just that on my coupe and love the tyres! massive difference from my fk453s that I have on my csl reps. took 300ish miles to properly bead in but now they're brilliant!”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 +7
    74
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests≈ 68 (est.)75
    Reviews found online6772

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 67

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 71.9 = 74

    No road tests of dry for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 72

    Wet

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 +7
    79
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests≈ 71 (est.)80
    Reviews found online7277

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 72

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 80.3 + 40% × 76.5 = 79

    No road tests of wet for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 69

    Snow

    ContiSportContact 5 +11
    58
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6851

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.5 = 69

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 51 = 58

    No road tests of snow for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 +8
    72
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6274

    ContiSportContact 5: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 62.1 = 64

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 40% × 69.9 (est.) + 60% × 73.5 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for ContiSportContact 5 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    ContiSportContact 5 +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 67 (est.)64
    Reviews found online7576

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 75 = 70

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 63.5 + 40% × 76.3 = 69

    No road tests of noise for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 56

    Treadwear

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 +12
    68
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 60 (est.)70
    Reviews found online5066

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 60.5 (est.) + 40% × 50 = 56

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 70.1 + 40% × 65.8 = 68

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    74
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
    Reviews found online–74
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    75
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests–75
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiSportContact 5 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiSportContact 5Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Relative Score 67 71
Dry 67 74
Wet 72 79
Snow 69 58
Comfort 64 72
Noise 70 69
Treadwear 56 68
Handling (owners) – 74
Efficiency – 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ContiSportContact 5

± 5

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiSportContact 5

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and compliance over bumps
  • Low road noise levels, especially compared to OEM or competitor alternatives
  • Strong wet and dry grip for everyday and spirited driving

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls lead to a somewhat mushy or less precise steering feel when pushed hard
  • Faster-than-expected tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Vulnerability to sidewall damage, bubbles, or punctures from potholes
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental ContiSportContact 5

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3

Mixed

Community members frequently consider the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 as an affordable alternative when replacing factory run-flats, praising its handling, low road noise, and strong grip compared to earlier tires. However, sentiment is tempered by criticism of its poor snow capability as a summer tire, complaints about the RunOnFlat variant from performance car owners, and mixed tread wear reports compared to rivals like Michelin.

Top themes
#replacing run-flat tires#wet and dry grip#road noise and comfort#pricing and deals#staggered fitment sizing#tread wear longevity

Based on 32 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
CategorySummer tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available8639
Rim diameters17″ – 22″17″ – 22″
Tread depth8 - 10/32″7 - 11/32″
UTQG280 - 420 A - AA A240 - 300 AA A
SidewallBlack Side WallBlack Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering
Max pressure50 - 51 psi42 - 51 psi
Sizes in common2222

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiSportContact 5

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3

Narrow edge: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 — better treadwear, comfort and dry. Pick the Continental ContiSportContact 5 if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 68 vs 56 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental ContiSportContact 5 scores 69 vs 58 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 72 vs 64 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 74 vs 67 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ContiSportContact 5
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiSportContact 5 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3?

Which is better in the wet, ContiSportContact 5 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, 79 vs 72 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportContact 5 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, 74 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ContiSportContact 5 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3?

Continental ContiSportContact 5, 69 vs 58 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, ContiSportContact 5 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, ContiSportContact 5 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, 72 vs 64 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiSportContact 5 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, 68 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology