Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 12 + 18 road tests and 5,823 + 3,619 owner reviews. How we score

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is ahead, 83–73

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
± 5

Tests 74 · 12 tests Owners 69 · 5,823 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test (dry braking)

“I've got just that on my coupe and love the tyres! massive difference from my fk453s that I have on my csl reps. took 300ish miles to properly bead in but now they're brilliant!”

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
± 4

Tests 86 · 18 tests Owners 80 · 3,619 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wear)

“F1 Asy 5s on my S204. I can confirm they are pretty decent and have coped well with the tarmac-ripping 154hp and 184 lbs-ft torque of the M274 fitted to my wagon”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +11
    85
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 17 tests7585
    Reviews found online7285

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 71.7 = 74

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 85.4 + 40% × 84.7 = 85

  2. 79

    Wet

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +10
    89
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 17 tests8092
    Reviews found online7685

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 80 + 40% × 76.4 = 79

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 92.2 + 40% × 85.1 = 89

  3. 59

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)–
    Reviews found online51–

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 59

    No road tests of snow for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +9
    81
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests≈ 70 (est.)91
    Reviews found online7374

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 73 = 72

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 40% × 90.6 + 60% × 73.9 = 81

    No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 69

    Noise

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +1
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 13 tests6473
    Reviews found online76≈ 66 (est.)

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 63.5 + 40% × 76.2 = 69

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 70

    No owner ratings of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +10
    78
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests7083
    Reviews found online6671

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 70.1 + 40% × 66 = 68

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 82.8 + 40% × 71 = 78

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +10
    84
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    Reviews found online7484
  8. 75

    Efficiency

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 +14
    61
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 14 tests7561
Scores at a glance
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Relative Score 73 83
Dry 74 85
Wet 79 89
Snow 59 –
Comfort 72 81
Noise 69 70
Treadwear 68 78
Handling (owners) 74 84
Efficiency 75 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3

± 4

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEagle F1 Asymmetric 3Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 97% #10/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test 98% #4/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 99% #4/11 · 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test 100% #5/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 70% #6/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test 90% #5/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 98% #4/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test 98% #3/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 95% #10/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 98% #12/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test 99% #7/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 90% #5/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test 80% #4/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 99% #6/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test 97% #6/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test – Different tests
Wear Treadwear 72% #6/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/16 · 2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 100% #1/11 · 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test 97% #3/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 82% #3/6 · 2018 EVO UUHP Tyre Test 77% #7/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #9/16 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test #3/6 2021 Sportauto Summer Tire Test for Sportcars R19 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and compliance over bumps
  • Low road noise levels, especially compared to OEM or competitor alternatives
  • Strong wet and dry grip for everyday and spirited driving

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls lead to a somewhat mushy or less precise steering feel when pushed hard
  • Faster-than-expected tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Vulnerability to sidewall damage, bubbles, or punctures from potholes
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 review

Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip
  • Precise steering response and high-speed stability
  • Strong value for money compared to tier-one rivals

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear for some aggressive drivers
  • Notable road noise on coarse or concrete road surfaces
  • Stiffer sidewalls can lead to a harsher ride quality on certain vehicles
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3

Mixed

Community members frequently consider the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 as an affordable alternative when replacing factory run-flats, praising its handling, low road noise, and strong grip compared to earlier tires. However, sentiment is tempered by criticism of its poor snow capability as a summer tire, complaints about the RunOnFlat variant from performance car owners, and mixed tread wear reports compared to rivals like Michelin.

bobistheoilguy.com ·2018-05-28

“Originally Posted By: slacktide_bitog DTD has their memorial day sale, and the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 is $132 each, plus $200 in rebates. If you open up a DTD credit card, there is another $100 $50 rebate available (making the total $300 $250 off) I made a slight mistake, sorry But still, $200 or $250 off the set of four tires is a great deal”

forum.miata.net

“Quote: Originally Posted by Trigger I phoned around a number of local tire shops today for price & availability for the Potenza Sport; Conti Extreme Contact Sport 02, and the Michelin PS4-S, and nobody could see any of them (in the 215/45/17) available across Canada! TireRack delivers to Canada, does it? If I choose one of the Canada post codes as a location then it does show me both 205/45R17 and 215/45R17 available. Quote: Originally Posted by Trigger Another tire that has come across my radar which equals the Michelin PS4-S is the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport… Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 (F1A3) and Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3R (F1A3R) are available in the U.S. in stock 205/45R17 size. No other Goodyear summer performance tires are offered in Miata sizes in the U.S. Supersport is 19 inch and larger, I think. F1A3 is a competitor to PS4S, I've considered it for my previous Mustang V8, but poor wet performance put me off. Dry performance seems to be fine. I have not tried it myself. F1A3R is essentially a track tire with 100 treadwear. I haven't seen people in person who drove these on a Miata. If my goal was an ultimate grip I'd probably start with more known tire, maybe Bridgestone RE71RS.”

forums.mbclub.co.uk ·2018-08-22

“I've run Conti 5P's on my E63's and they grip well in both wet and dry, last reasonably (circa 13k miles on the rear, a little further on the front, and I change my tyres when they're down to 2.5mm - 3mm of tread), but are a bit noisy. My wife's SLK55 is on 5P's too and the fronts last about 20k, the rears 12k - 13k. Are you running MO-spec tyres or the generic version? This can have a significant effect on life expectancy. FWIW, I'm now running Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3's on my E63. They grip as well as, if not better than, the 5P's and are noticeably quieter. I've got 11.5k miles on the current set and they still have a good 5mm of tread remaining, so I anticipate that they will run to at least 14k miles.”

Top themes
#replacing run-flat tires#wet and dry grip#road noise and comfort#pricing and deals#staggered fitment sizing#tread wear longevity

Based on 32 community posts

Tire B

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Positive

Community members generally view the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 very positively, frequently praising its wet grip, cold weather performance, and steering feel when compared to rivals like Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and Pirelli P Zero. While some users find them exceptionally quiet, others note moderate road noise or low-speed scrubbing on full lock.

Top themes
#wet grip performance#comparison to Michelin PS4#road noise levels#cold temperature handling#full lock scrubbing

Based on 13 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3964
Rim diameters17″ – 22″17″ – 22″
Tread depth7 - 11/32″7 - 9/32″
UTQG240 - 300 AA A300 - 500 A - AA A
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Black LetteringBlack Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering
Max pressure42 - 51 psi50 - 51 psi
Sizes in common2525

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — better dry, wet and treadwear. Pick the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 if efficiency matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 75 vs 61 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 85 vs 74 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 89 vs 79 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 78 vs 68 on treadwear.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5?

Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 89 vs 79 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 85 vs 74 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 81 vs 72 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 78 vs 68 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, 75 vs 61 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology