Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 vs Pirelli P Zero (PZ4) — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 12 + 33 road tests and 5,823 + 2,638 owner reviews. How we score

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 is ahead, 73–66

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
± 5

Tests 74 · 12 tests Owners 69 · 5,823 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test (dry braking)

“I've got just that on my coupe and love the tyres! massive difference from my fk453s that I have on my csl reps. took 300ish miles to properly bead in but now they're brilliant!”

Pirelli P Zero (PZ4)
Tire BPirelli

P Zero (PZ4)

Summer

± 5

Tests 68 · 33 tests Owners 62 · 2,638 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test (wet handling)

“Urus Performante: Pirelli P Zero gone after 5.5k miles — normal or switch? My stock Pirelli P Zero (PZ4) on my Urus Performante are already done after just 5,500 miles (~9,500 km), mostly highway driving, no speeding, no track. Pretty disappointed with the lifespan. Got quoted $5,000 for the same Lamborghini-certified set. Alternatives are Michelin ($3,500), Nankang or any other options? Is this normal wear for this car? And are the OEM-certified tires actually worth that price, or better to switch?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 7 tests that measured dry braking for both, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 won 2 and P Zero (PZ4) won 5 (average 96% vs 97% of the best).
  • In 7 tests that measured dry handling for both, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 won 1 and P Zero (PZ4) won 5 (average 98% vs 99% of the best).
  • In 7 tests that measured wet braking for both, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 won 3 and P Zero (PZ4) won 4 (average 91% vs 91% of the best).
  • In 6 tests that measured wet handling for both, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 won 1 and P Zero (PZ4) won 5 (average 97% vs 98% of the best).
  1. 74

    Dry

    P Zero (PZ4) +9
    83
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3P Zero (PZ4)
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 30 tests7589
    Reviews found online7273
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 7 shared tests · wins 2–596%97%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 7 shared tests · wins 1–598%99%
    Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–190%100%

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 71.7 = 74

    P Zero (PZ4): 60% × 89.3 + 40% × 73 = 83

  2. 79

    Wet

    P Zero (PZ4) +1
    80
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3P Zero (PZ4)
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 31 tests8087
    Reviews found online7770
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–097%95%
    Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–180%100%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 7 shared tests · wins 3–491%91%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 6 shared tests · wins 1–597%98%

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 80 + 40% × 76.5 = 79

    P Zero (PZ4): 60% × 86.8 + 40% × 69.7 = 80

  3. 59

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3P Zero (PZ4)
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)–
    Reviews found online51–

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 50.5 = 59

    No road tests of snow for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 +9
    63
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3P Zero (PZ4)
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests≈ 70 (est.)68
    Reviews found online7360

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 73.1 = 72

    P Zero (PZ4): 40% × 68.5 + 60% × 59.5 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 69

    Noise

    Level
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3P Zero (PZ4)
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 19 tests6472
    Reviews found online76≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–197%98%

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 63.5 + 40% × 76.2 = 69

    P Zero (PZ4): 60% × 71.5 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 69

    No owner ratings of noise for P Zero (PZ4). The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 +35
    33
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3P Zero (PZ4)
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests7028
    Reviews found online6642

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 70.1 + 40% × 66 = 68

    P Zero (PZ4): 60% × 27.7 + 40% × 41.7 = 33

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 +4
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3P Zero (PZ4)
    Reviews found online7470
  8. 75

    Efficiency

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 +47
    28
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3P Zero (PZ4)
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 21 tests7528
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%92%
Scores at a glance
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 vs Pirelli P Zero (PZ4): scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3Pirelli P Zero (PZ4)
Relative Score 73 66
Dry 74 83
Wet 79 80
Snow 59 –
Comfort 72 63
Noise 69 69
Treadwear 68 33
Handling (owners) 74 70
Efficiency 75 28

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3

± 5

P Zero (PZ4)

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 7 tests that ran both, Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 finished ahead 2 times and Pirelli P Zero (PZ4) 5 times.

DisciplineCategoryEagle F1 Asymmetric 3P Zero (PZ4)ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 96% 97% −1.0 2–5 in 7 shared tests Newest: 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Dry Handling Dry 98% 99% −1.3 1–5 in 7 shared tests Newest: 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 90% 100% −10.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 97% 95% +2.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wet Braking Wet 91% 91% −0.1 3–4 in 7 shared tests Newest: 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wet Handling Wet 97% 98% −1.3 1–5 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 80% 100% −20.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Noise Noise 97% 98% −1.5 0–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 100% 92% +8.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #5/11 #4/11 – 2–5 in 7 shared tests Newest: 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test · 225/45 R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and compliance over bumps
  • Low road noise levels, especially compared to OEM or competitor alternatives
  • Strong wet and dry grip for everyday and spirited driving

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls lead to a somewhat mushy or less precise steering feel when pushed hard
  • Faster-than-expected tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Vulnerability to sidewall damage, bubbles, or punctures from potholes
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 review

Tire B P Zero (PZ4)

Pros

  • Outstanding dry grip and handling performance
  • Precise steering feedback and agile cornering stability
  • Low road noise and high comfort on smooth tarmac

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear, especially on performance or rear-wheel-drive vehicles
  • Subpar performance and susceptibility to aquaplaning in cold or heavy wet weather
  • Stiff ride quality that can transmit harsh impacts on rough roads
All owner themes in the P Zero (PZ4) review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3

Mixed

Community members frequently consider the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 as an affordable alternative when replacing factory run-flats, praising its handling, low road noise, and strong grip compared to earlier tires. However, sentiment is tempered by criticism of its poor snow capability as a summer tire, complaints about the RunOnFlat variant from performance car owners, and mixed tread wear reports compared to rivals like Michelin.

bobistheoilguy.com ·2018-05-28

“Originally Posted By: slacktide_bitog DTD has their memorial day sale, and the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 is $132 each, plus $200 in rebates. If you open up a DTD credit card, there is another $100 $50 rebate available (making the total $300 $250 off) I made a slight mistake, sorry But still, $200 or $250 off the set of four tires is a great deal”

f30.bimmerpost.com

“Hi, I currently have Falken Azenis FK510s all round and i need to replace both front tyres. Sticking with Runflats, are these a good option: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 (225/40 R19 93Y) ROF XL *BMW [F] and is there any downsides to running 2 different brands? The back don't need changing yet car is a 335d xDrive Thanks for any info”

forums.mbclub.co.uk ·2018-08-22

“I've run Conti 5P's on my E63's and they grip well in both wet and dry, last reasonably (circa 13k miles on the rear, a little further on the front, and I change my tyres when they're down to 2.5mm - 3mm of tread), but are a bit noisy. My wife's SLK55 is on 5P's too and the fronts last about 20k, the rears 12k - 13k. Are you running MO-spec tyres or the generic version? This can have a significant effect on life expectancy. FWIW, I'm now running Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3's on my E63. They grip as well as, if not better than, the 5P's and are noticeably quieter. I've got 11.5k miles on the current set and they still have a good 5mm of tread remaining, so I anticipate that they will run to at least 14k miles.”

Top themes
#replacing run-flat tires#wet and dry grip#road noise and comfort#pricing and deals#staggered fitment sizing#tread wear longevity

Based on 32 community posts

Tire B

Pirelli P Zero (PZ4)

Negative

Community sentiment regarding the Pirelli P Zero (PZ4) is largely critical, with users reporting extremely rapid tread wear and severe grip issues outside of warm, dry conditions. While some drivers consider them for OEM run-flat availability, multiple posts highlight concerns over poor longevity and lackluster wet and cold weather performance compared to competitors like Michelin.

Top themes
#rapid tread wear#cold and wet grip#run flat availability#comparison to Michelin#OEM tire lifespan#luxury versus sport variants

Based on 7 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 B · Pirelli P Zero (PZ4)
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available39193
Rim diameters17″ – 22″17″ – 24″
Tread depth7 - 11/32″—
UTQG240 - 300 AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering—
Max pressure42 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common3232

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3

Pirelli P Zero (PZ4)

Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 — better efficiency, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Pirelli P Zero (PZ4) if dry matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 75 vs 28 on efficiency.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 68 vs 33 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 72 vs 63 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Pirelli P Zero (PZ4) scores 83 vs 74 on dry.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Tire B · Pirelli P Zero (PZ4)

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 or P Zero (PZ4)?

Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 or P Zero (PZ4)?

Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 80 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 or P Zero (PZ4)?

Pirelli P Zero (PZ4), 83 vs 74 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 or P Zero (PZ4)?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 or P Zero (PZ4)?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, 72 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 or P Zero (PZ4)?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, 68 vs 33 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 or P Zero (PZ4)?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, 75 vs 28 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology