Head-to-head Updated

Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ vs Vredestein Hi Trac — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 12 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

Hi Trac is ahead, 75–54

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Vredestein Hi Trac

Hi Trac

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 11 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 55

    Dry

    Hi Trac +20
    75
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+Hi Trac
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online4879

    ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 47.7 = 55

    Hi Trac: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 75

    No road tests of dry for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Hi Trac. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 58

    Wet

    Hi Trac +21
    79
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+Hi Trac
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 77 (est.)
    Reviews found online5382

    ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 53.2 = 58

    Hi Trac: 60% × 76.7 (est.) + 40% × 81.5 = 79

    No road tests of wet for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Hi Trac. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 58

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+Hi Trac
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)–
    Reviews found online49–

    ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 49.1 = 58

    No road tests of snow for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 46

    Comfort

    Hi Trac +23
    69
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+Hi Trac
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online3570

    ControlContact Sport SRS+: 40% × 61.8 (est.) + 60% × 34.9 = 46

    Hi Trac: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 69.8 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Hi Trac. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 54

    Treadwear

    Hi Trac +17
    71
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+Hi Trac
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online4673

    ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 54

    Hi Trac: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Hi Trac. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 42

    Handling (owners)

    Hi Trac +30
    72
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+Hi Trac
    Reviews found online4272
Scores at a glance
Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ vs Vredestein Hi Trac: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ControlContact Sport SRS+Vredestein Hi Trac
Relative Score 54 75
Dry 55 75
Wet 58 79
Snow 58 –
Comfort 46 69
Treadwear 54 71
Handling (owners) 42 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ControlContact Sport SRS+

± 8

Hi Trac

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ControlContact Sport SRS+

Pros

  • Strong dry and wet pavement traction
  • Solid cornering stability and steering response
  • Good value proposition for budget-conscious drivers

Cons

  • Excessive road noise and cabin drone
  • Noticeable vibration and harshness over uneven surfaces
  • Inconsistent tread life reported by some users
All owner themes in the ControlContact Sport SRS+ review

Tire B Hi Trac

Pros

  • Exceptional wet-weather grip and safety
  • High tread longevity and durability
  • Strong value for money

Cons

  • Increased road noise at higher speeds
  • Sensitivity to uneven road surfaces or ruts
  • Limited performance on non-asphalt surfaces
All owner themes in the Hi Trac review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ B · Vredestein Hi Trac
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
UTQG560 A - AA A240 A A

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+

Vredestein Hi Trac

Winner: Vredestein Hi Trac — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Vredestein Hi Trac rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Vredestein Hi Trac scores 72 vs 42 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Vredestein Hi Trac scores 69 vs 46 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein Hi Trac scores 79 vs 58 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Vredestein Hi Trac scores 75 vs 55 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+
Tire B · Vredestein Hi Trac

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ControlContact Sport SRS+ or Hi Trac?

Which is better in the wet, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or Hi Trac?

Vredestein Hi Trac, 79 vs 58 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or Hi Trac?

Vredestein Hi Trac, 75 vs 55 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or Hi Trac?

Vredestein Hi Trac, 69 vs 46 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or Hi Trac?

Vredestein Hi Trac, 71 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology