Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 12 reviews
Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ vs Yokohama AVID Ascend — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
AVID Ascend is ahead, 71–59
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 80 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
61
Dry
AVID Ascend +1273Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ AVID Ascend Reviews found online 56 75 -
61
Wet
AVID Ascend +1273Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ AVID Ascend Reviews found online 59 74 -
59
Snow
AVID Ascend +766Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ AVID Ascend Reviews found online 51 63 -
58
Comfort
AVID Ascend +1371Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ AVID Ascend Reviews found online 48 73 -
–
Noise
No comparison70Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ AVID Ascend Reviews found online – 74 -
60
Treadwear
AVID Ascend +969Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ AVID Ascend Reviews found online 56 71 -
50
Handling
AVID Ascend +2474Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ AVID Ascend Reviews found online 50 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ | Yokohama AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 59 | 71 |
| Dry | 61 | 73 |
| Wet | 61 | 73 |
| Snow | 59 | 66 |
| Comfort | 58 | 71 |
| Noise | – | 70 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 69 |
| Handling | 50 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
ControlContact Sport SRS+
AVID Ascend
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ControlContact Sport SRS+
Pros
- Strong dry and wet pavement traction
- Solid cornering stability and steering response
- Good value proposition for budget-conscious drivers
Cons
- Excessive road noise and cabin drone
- Noticeable vibration and harshness over uneven surfaces
- Inconsistent tread life reported by some users
Tire B AVID Ascend
Pros
- Exceptionally low road noise and quiet ride
- High level of ride comfort and shock absorption
- Strong wet and dry traction, inspiring confidence in heavy rain
Cons
- Isolated reports of premature tread wear or not meeting expected mileage
- Slightly spongy initial feel requiring a brief break-in period
- Occasional minor wheel slip during hard acceleration in wet or dry conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ | B · Yokohama AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 12/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 740 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 75,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+
Yokohama AVID Ascend
Winner: Yokohama AVID Ascend — better handling, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 74 vs 50 on handling.
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 71 vs 58 on comfort.
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 73 vs 61 on dry.
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 73 vs 61 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.