Head-to-head Updated

Continental Cross Contact A/T vs Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 5 road tests and 14 + 773 owner reviews. How we score

EfficientGrip 2 SUV is ahead, 79–64

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV

Tests 80 · 5 tests Owners 79 · 773 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV +15
    79
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TEfficientGrip 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 66 (est.)77
    Reviews found online6283

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 82.8 = 79

    No road tests of dry for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 64

    Wet

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV +16
    80
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TEfficientGrip 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 66 (est.)81
    Reviews found online6379

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 60% × 81 + 40% × 79.1 = 80

    No road tests of wet for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 53

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TEfficientGrip 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)–
    Reviews found online41–

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 53

    No road tests of snow for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV +14
    79
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TEfficientGrip 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 68 (est.)80
    Reviews found online6077

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 65

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 60% × 80.1 + 40% × 76.6 = 79

    No road tests of comfort for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    83
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TEfficientGrip 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests–93
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 60% × 93.4 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 83

    No owner ratings of noise for EfficientGrip 2 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV +14
    79
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TEfficientGrip 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 65 (est.)80
    Reviews found online6477

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 60% × 79.5 + 40% × 77.2 = 79

    No road tests of treadwear for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 62

    Handling (owners)

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV +17
    79
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TEfficientGrip 2 SUV
    Reviews found online6279
Scores at a glance
Continental Cross Contact A/T vs Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental Cross Contact A/TGoodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV
Relative Score 64 79
Dry 64 79
Wet 64 80
Snow 53 –
Comfort 65 79
Noise – 83
Treadwear 65 79
Handling (owners) 62 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Cross Contact A/T

EfficientGrip 2 SUV

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryCross Contact A/TEfficientGrip 2 SUVΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #7/7 2017 Drive Out Off Road 4x4 Tyre Test #3/8 2025 EV Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Cross Contact A/T

Pros

  • Excellent on-road comfort and handling with acceptable noise levels
  • High potential longevity and mileage for many users, with sets lasting upwards of 50,000 to 80,000 km/miles
  • Competent dry and wet performance on paved surfaces

Cons

  • Susceptibility to punctures and fragile sidewalls reported by some drivers
  • Rapid, premature tread wear experienced by certain users
  • Poor traction and spinning issues in winter conditions such as snow and ice
All owner themes in the Cross Contact A/T review

Tire B EfficientGrip 2 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
  • Strong and confidence-inspiring grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Impressive tread wear and long-term durability

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can compromise responsive handling and cornering feedback
  • Less effective performance in cold, freezing, or damp winter conditions
  • Lack of built-in rim protection
All owner themes in the EfficientGrip 2 SUV review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental Cross Contact A/T B · Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV
CategoryAll-Terrain tireSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available—41
Rim diameters—16″ – 22″

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental Cross Contact A/T

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV

Winner: Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental Cross Contact A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV scores 79 vs 62 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV scores 80 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV scores 79 vs 64 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV scores 79 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental Cross Contact A/T
Tire B · Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Cross Contact A/T or EfficientGrip 2 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, Cross Contact A/T or EfficientGrip 2 SUV?

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV, 80 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Cross Contact A/T or EfficientGrip 2 SUV?

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV, 79 vs 64 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Cross Contact A/T or EfficientGrip 2 SUV?

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV, 79 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Cross Contact A/T or EfficientGrip 2 SUV?

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV, 79 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology