Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 14 reviews
Continental Cross Contact A/T vs Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 5 road tests and 14 + 773 owner reviews. How we score
EfficientGrip 2 SUV is ahead, 79–64
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 80 · 5 tests Owners 79 · 773 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested (noise)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
EfficientGrip 2 SUV +1579Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T EfficientGrip 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 62 83 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 82.8 = 79
No road tests of dry for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
64
Wet
EfficientGrip 2 SUV +1680Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T EfficientGrip 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 63 79 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64
EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 60% × 81 + 40% × 79.1 = 80
No road tests of wet for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
53
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T EfficientGrip 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) – Reviews found online 41 – Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 53
No road tests of snow for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
65
Comfort
EfficientGrip 2 SUV +1479Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T EfficientGrip 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 80 Reviews found online 60 77 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 65
EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 60% × 80.1 + 40% × 76.6 = 79
No road tests of comfort for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison83Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T EfficientGrip 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests – 93 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 60% × 93.4 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 83
No owner ratings of noise for EfficientGrip 2 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
65
Treadwear
EfficientGrip 2 SUV +1479Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T EfficientGrip 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 80 Reviews found online 64 77 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65
EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 60% × 79.5 + 40% × 77.2 = 79
No road tests of treadwear for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
62
Handling (owners)
EfficientGrip 2 SUV +1779Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T EfficientGrip 2 SUV Reviews found online 62 79
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Cross Contact A/T | Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 79 |
| Dry | 64 | 79 |
| Wet | 64 | 80 |
| Snow | 53 | – |
| Comfort | 65 | 79 |
| Noise | – | 83 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 79 |
| Handling (owners) | 62 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Cross Contact A/T
EfficientGrip 2 SUV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Cross Contact A/T | EfficientGrip 2 SUV | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #7/7 2017 Drive Out Off Road 4x4 Tyre Test | #3/8 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Cross Contact A/T
Pros
- Excellent on-road comfort and handling with acceptable noise levels
- High potential longevity and mileage for many users, with sets lasting upwards of 50,000 to 80,000 km/miles
- Competent dry and wet performance on paved surfaces
Cons
- Susceptibility to punctures and fragile sidewalls reported by some drivers
- Rapid, premature tread wear experienced by certain users
- Poor traction and spinning issues in winter conditions such as snow and ice
Tire B EfficientGrip 2 SUV
Pros
- Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
- Strong and confidence-inspiring grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Impressive tread wear and long-term durability
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can compromise responsive handling and cornering feedback
- Less effective performance in cold, freezing, or damp winter conditions
- Lack of built-in rim protection
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Cross Contact A/T | B · Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 41 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 22″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental Cross Contact A/T
Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV
Winner: Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental Cross Contact A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV scores 79 vs 62 on handling.
Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV scores 80 vs 64 on wet.
Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV scores 79 vs 64 on dry.
Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV scores 79 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Cross Contact A/T or EfficientGrip 2 SUV?
Which is better in the wet, Cross Contact A/T or EfficientGrip 2 SUV?
Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV, 80 vs 64 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Cross Contact A/T or EfficientGrip 2 SUV?
Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV, 79 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Cross Contact A/T or EfficientGrip 2 SUV?
Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV, 79 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Cross Contact A/T or EfficientGrip 2 SUV?
Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV, 79 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology