Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 14 reviews
Continental Cross Contact A/T vs Hankook Dynapro AT2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 218 owner reviews. How we score
Cross Contact A/T leads, 60–56 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 218 reviews
“New shoes for the Sunset Truck Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extremes in 30x9.5. Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
61
Dry
Cross Contact A/T +556Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 58 50 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 57.9 = 61
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60.5 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 56
No road tests of dry for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
62
Wet
Cross Contact A/T +458Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 59 54 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 59.4 = 62
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 58
No road tests of wet for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
55
Snow
Dynapro AT2 +661Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 45 55 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.9 = 55
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.1 = 61
No road tests of snow for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
60
Comfort
Cross Contact A/T +852Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 57 45 Cross Contact A/T: 40% × 66.2 (est.) + 60% × 56.5 = 60
Dynapro AT2: 40% × 63.9 (est.) + 60% × 44.9 = 52
No road tests of comfort for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
-
64
Treadwear
Cross Contact A/T +955Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 62 48 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 64
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.3 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
57
Handling (owners)
Cross Contact A/T +1047Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Dynapro AT2 Reviews found online 57 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Cross Contact A/T | Hankook Dynapro AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 60 | 56 |
| Dry | 61 | 56 |
| Wet | 62 | 58 |
| Snow | 55 | 61 |
| Comfort | 60 | 52 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 57 | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Cross Contact A/T
Dynapro AT2
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Cross Contact A/T
Pros
- Excellent on-road comfort and handling with acceptable noise levels
- High potential longevity and mileage for many users, with sets lasting upwards of 50,000 to 80,000 km/miles
- Competent dry and wet performance on paved surfaces
Cons
- Susceptibility to punctures and fragile sidewalls reported by some drivers
- Rapid, premature tread wear experienced by certain users
- Poor traction and spinning issues in winter conditions such as snow and ice
Tire B Dynapro AT2
Pros
- Comfortable ride quality on asphalt compared to standard summer or previous all-terrain models
- Good traction and control in dry and wet weather conditions, including dependable trailer towing
- Favorable fuel economy (MPGs) and low road noise for many users when new
Cons
- Poor performance and lack of secure handling in snow, ice, and slush at highway speeds
- Develops significant road noise or drumming as the tread wears down
- Concerns regarding casing durability, including reports of premature cracking and vulnerability to gravel punctures
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental Cross Contact A/T
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Hankook Dynapro AT2
Community sentiment for the Hankook Dynapro AT2 is divided, with frequent distinctions drawn between standard OEM versions and aftermarket or 'Xtreme' models. While drivers appreciate the tire's quiet highway ride, decent fuel economy, and competitive pricing, many criticize the base factory version for poor wet and winter traction as well as lack of genuine off-road capability. In contrast, the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme variant receives widespread praise for improved snow performance, durability, and aggressive styling.
“I had the Hankook AT2 on my 2019 from the factory and they were way better than the Pirelli's that came on my '15 and my '22 F-150 FX4 trucks. They may not be a true AT tire, but they gave me 50,000 miles and functioned well in MN winters as on road tire and did well enough on the small number of off road excursions they took me on while hunting ( half mile to mile dirt trails and across various set-aside agricultural fields).”
“I just got the extreme at2 and they are awesome and quiet. Did go on an easy/moderate off-road in Broken Bow, OK and they did outstanding!”
“I had the Dynapro AT2’s on my Lightning and they’re ok. I’d say they’re excellent dry, ok wet and in mud, marginal in snow. When I was looking for new tires I wanted an All Terrain that was slightly more aggressive for off-road and Three-Peak snow rated. But, with the Lightning, they couldn’t be a heavy tire as it would hurt range. Ended up settling on the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme. Essentially this is the newer version of the AT2. I’ve got about 10,000 miles on them so far and I’ll say dry handling is a little worse than the old AT2 (probably due to the more aggressive lugs), wet handling is about the same, but mud and snow handling is noticeably improved. So all in all, I probably wouldn’t get the AT2 again but I would do the AT2 Xtreme again.”
Based on 47 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Cross Contact A/T | B · Hankook Dynapro AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 33 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| UTQG | — | 440 - 660 A A - B |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental Cross Contact A/T
Hankook Dynapro AT2
Narrow edge: Continental Cross Contact A/T — better handling, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Hankook Dynapro AT2 if snow matters most to you. Continental Cross Contact A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 57 vs 47 on handling.
Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 64 vs 55 on treadwear.
Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 60 vs 52 on comfort.
Hankook Dynapro AT2 scores 61 vs 55 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Cross Contact A/T or Dynapro AT2?
Which is better in the wet, Cross Contact A/T or Dynapro AT2?
Continental Cross Contact A/T, 62 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Cross Contact A/T or Dynapro AT2?
Continental Cross Contact A/T, 61 vs 56 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Cross Contact A/T or Dynapro AT2?
Hankook Dynapro AT2, 61 vs 55 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Cross Contact A/T or Dynapro AT2?
Continental Cross Contact A/T, 60 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Cross Contact A/T or Dynapro AT2?
Continental Cross Contact A/T, 64 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology