tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental Cross Contact A/T vs Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 186 owner reviews. How we score

DynaPro A/TM RF10 is ahead, 72–62

Check price on Amazon · DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Cross Contact A/T on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +9
    73
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6277

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 64

    Wet

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +10
    74
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6375

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 53

    Snow

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +12
    65
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online4162

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 53

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +7
    72
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6075

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 65

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for Cross Contact A/T or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–73

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6475

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 62

    Handling (owners)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +9
    71
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Reviews found online6271
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental Cross Contact A/THankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Relative Score 62 72
Dry 64 73
Wet 64 74
Snow 53 65
Comfort 65 72
Noise – 70
Treadwear 65 71
Handling (owners) 62 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Cross Contact A/T

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Continental Cross Contact A/T finished ahead 0 times and Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 1 times.

DisciplineCategoryCross Contact A/TDynaPro A/TM RF10ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #7/7 #4/7 – 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Drive Out Off Road 4x4 Tyre Test · 265/65 R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Cross Contact A/T

Pros

  • Excellent on-road comfort and handling with acceptable noise levels
  • High potential longevity and mileage for many users, with sets lasting upwards of 50,000 to 80,000 km/miles
  • Competent dry and wet performance on paved surfaces

Cons

  • Susceptibility to punctures and fragile sidewalls reported by some drivers
  • Rapid, premature tread wear experienced by certain users
  • Poor traction and spinning issues in winter conditions such as snow and ice
All owner themes in the Cross Contact A/T review

Tire B DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental Cross Contact A/T B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available—29
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″
Tread depth—13/32″
UTQG—560 A B
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Outlined White Lettering
Max pressure—44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental Cross Contact A/T

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Winner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better snow, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental Cross Contact A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 65 vs 53 on snow.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 64 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 62 on handling.

Tire A · Continental Cross Contact A/T
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Cross Contact A/T or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Which is better in the wet, Cross Contact A/T or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Cross Contact A/T or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 64 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Cross Contact A/T or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 65 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Cross Contact A/T or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Cross Contact A/T or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology