tirewheelguide

Hankook Dynapro M/T looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental Cross Contact A/T vs Hankook Dynapro M/T — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

Dynapro M/T leads, 66–62 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Dynapro M/T or Cross Contact A/T on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro M/T
Tire BHankook

Dynapro M/T

Mud-Terrain tire

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 5 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    Dynapro M/T +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDynapro M/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6264

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65

    No road tests of dry for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 64

    Wet

    Dynapro M/T +4
    68
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDynapro M/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6367

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 53

    Snow

    Dynapro M/T +16
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDynapro M/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online4169

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 53

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 69

    No road tests of snow for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    Cross Contact A/T +4
    61
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDynapro M/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6054

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 65

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for Cross Contact A/T or Dynapro M/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 65

    Treadwear

    Dynapro M/T +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDynapro M/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6467

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 62

    Handling (owners)

    Cross Contact A/T +1
    61
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TDynapro M/T
    Reviews found online6261
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental Cross Contact A/THankook Dynapro M/T
Relative Score 62 66
Dry 64 65
Wet 64 68
Snow 53 69
Comfort 65 61
Treadwear 65 66
Handling (owners) 62 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Cross Contact A/T

Dynapro M/T

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryCross Contact A/TDynapro M/TΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #7/7 2017 Drive Out Off Road 4x4 Tyre Test #5/10 2016 All Terrain and Off Road MT Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Cross Contact A/T

Pros

  • Excellent on-road comfort and handling with acceptable noise levels
  • High potential longevity and mileage for many users, with sets lasting upwards of 50,000 to 80,000 km/miles
  • Competent dry and wet performance on paved surfaces

Cons

  • Susceptibility to punctures and fragile sidewalls reported by some drivers
  • Rapid, premature tread wear experienced by certain users
  • Poor traction and spinning issues in winter conditions such as snow and ice
All owner themes in the Cross Contact A/T review

Tire B Dynapro M/T

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and overall mileage considering heavy use
  • Surprisingly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
  • Strong dry and off-road traction, often reducing the need for 4WD

Cons

  • Severe loss of wet traction and dangerous slip/understeer tendencies as the rubber compound hardens over time
  • Prone to slow punctures on the running surface under heavy loads
  • Develops uneven wear patterns over extended high-mileage use
All owner themes in the Dynapro M/T review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental Cross Contact A/T B · Hankook Dynapro M/T
CategoryAll-Terrain tireMud-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental Cross Contact A/T

Hankook Dynapro M/T

Narrow edge: Hankook Dynapro M/T — better snow and wet. Pick the Continental Cross Contact A/T if comfort matters most to you. Continental Cross Contact A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Hankook Dynapro M/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 69 vs 53 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 65 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 68 vs 64 on wet.

Tire A · Continental Cross Contact A/T
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro M/T
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Cross Contact A/T or Dynapro M/T?

Which is better in the wet, Cross Contact A/T or Dynapro M/T?

Hankook Dynapro M/T, 68 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Cross Contact A/T or Dynapro M/T?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 65 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Cross Contact A/T or Dynapro M/T?

Hankook Dynapro M/T, 69 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Cross Contact A/T or Dynapro M/T?

Continental Cross Contact A/T, 65 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Cross Contact A/T or Dynapro M/T?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology