Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 14 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental Cross Contact A/T vs Kumho Crugen HP71 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 275 owner reviews. How we score
Cross Contact A/T is ahead, 62–52
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 275 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
Cross Contact A/T +1648Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 55 (est.) Reviews found online 62 37 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
Crugen HP71: 60% × 55.2 (est.) + 40% × 36.6 = 48
No road tests of dry for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
64
Wet
Cross Contact A/T +955Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 63 49 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64
Crugen HP71: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 49.1 = 55
No road tests of wet for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
53
Snow
Crugen HP71 +457Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 41 48 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 53
Crugen HP71: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.6 = 57
No road tests of snow for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
65
Comfort
Cross Contact A/T +1154Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 60 40 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 65
Crugen HP71: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 39.6 = 54
No road tests of comfort for Cross Contact A/T or Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison58Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 44 Crugen HP71: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 43.7 = 58
No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Cross Contact A/T +2144Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 54 (est.) Reviews found online 64 29 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65
Crugen HP71: 60% × 54.4 (est.) + 40% × 29.1 = 44
No road tests of treadwear for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
62
Handling (owners)
Cross Contact A/T +755Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Crugen HP71 Reviews found online 62 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Cross Contact A/T | Kumho Crugen HP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 52 |
| Dry | 64 | 48 |
| Wet | 64 | 55 |
| Snow | 53 | 57 |
| Comfort | 65 | 54 |
| Noise | – | 58 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 44 |
| Handling (owners) | 62 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
62
/ 100
Cross Contact A/T
52
/ 100
Crugen HP71
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Cross Contact A/T | Crugen HP71 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #7/7 2017 Drive Out Off Road 4x4 Tyre Test | #8/9 2021 Teknikens Värld Summer Tire Test R18 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Cross Contact A/T
Pros
- Excellent on-road comfort and handling with acceptable noise levels
- High potential longevity and mileage for many users, with sets lasting upwards of 50,000 to 80,000 km/miles
- Competent dry and wet performance on paved surfaces
Cons
- Susceptibility to punctures and fragile sidewalls reported by some drivers
- Rapid, premature tread wear experienced by certain users
- Poor traction and spinning issues in winter conditions such as snow and ice
Tire B Crugen HP71
Pros
- Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
- Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
- Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain
Cons
- Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
- Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
- Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Continental Cross Contact A/T
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Kumho Crugen HP71
Community sentiment for the Kumho Crugen HP71 (and its EV variant) is mixed, with owners praising its affordability, comfortable ride, and quiet performance on many vehicles. However, a significant number of drivers report disappointingly rapid tread wear—particularly on heavy electric vehicles—as well as occasional noise on coarse surfaces and internal acoustic foam detachment issues.
bobistheoilguy.com
·2023-03-02
“Bought a set of Kumho tires to replace the OE Michelins on the wife's Ford Edge. The Michelins have barely 35K and aren't going to pass the NC safety check. For being a top tier tire they were wildly mediocre. I've has several sets of Kumho and they are better than average and not too expensive. I bought four of these. Anybody have experience with Kumhos? Kumho Crugen HP71 245 /60 R18 105V SL BSW”
r/VWiD4Owners
·3 upvotes ·2026-02-14
“2023 ID4 AWD Pro S Kumho Crugen EV HP71 I replaced the original worn down (and one with a sidewall bump) Pirellis at 33k with the EV version (badges on the sidewall) of the HP71 (direct from dealer). They're more expensive than the non-EV versions and have a lower warranty. So far they're impressive: ride is softer/smoother, quieter, deep treads. Hard to tell if efficiency changed with the winter weather, but we were getting 3mi/kWh on a 34 degree day.”
teslamotorsclub.com
·2 upvotes ·2026-02-12
“That is a crazy good price - The TA91 is low $200s wholesale! (Tire shop pricing). And $279.30 retail. (Tire Rack) Grab them while you can. Sometimes Wal Mart beats any price I can get when they're blowing out a specific tire. FWIW we run the Kumho HP71 EV (OE tire) on our EV9 and it's a super quiet tire. I bought it again for the Spring now that the car is actually aligned and won't burn through them.”
Top themes
#Rapid tread wear#Affordable price value#Cabin noise levels#Ride comfort#EV tire performance#Acoustic foam issues#OEM tire replacement
Based on 51 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Cross Contact A/T | B · Kumho Crugen HP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 63 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9.9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 640 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
62
/ 100
Continental Cross Contact A/T
52
/ 100
Kumho Crugen HP71
Winner: Continental Cross Contact A/T — better treadwear, dry and comfort. Pick the Kumho Crugen HP71 if snow matters most to you. Continental Cross Contact A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 65 vs 44 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 64 vs 48 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 65 vs 54 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 64 vs 55 on wet.
Tire A · Continental Cross Contact A/T
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HP71
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Cross Contact A/T or Crugen HP71?
Which is better in the wet, Cross Contact A/T or Crugen HP71?
Continental Cross Contact A/T, 64 vs 55 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Cross Contact A/T or Crugen HP71?
Continental Cross Contact A/T, 64 vs 48 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Cross Contact A/T or Crugen HP71?
Kumho Crugen HP71, 57 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Cross Contact A/T or Crugen HP71?
Continental Cross Contact A/T, 65 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Cross Contact A/T or Crugen HP71?
Continental Cross Contact A/T, 65 vs 44 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology