Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 14 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental Cross Contact A/T vs Michelin Energy Saver A/S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
Cross Contact A/T is ahead, 62–55
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 10 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
Cross Contact A/T +856Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Energy Saver A/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 62 49 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 56
No road tests of dry for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
64
Wet
Cross Contact A/T +1054Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Energy Saver A/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 63 49 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64
Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 57.9 (est.) + 40% × 48.5 = 54
No road tests of wet for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
53
Snow
Energy Saver A/S +154Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Energy Saver A/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 41 43 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 53
Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 43.3 = 54
No road tests of snow for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
65
Comfort
Cross Contact A/T +560Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Energy Saver A/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 60 50 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 65
Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.3 = 60
No road tests of comfort for Cross Contact A/T or Energy Saver A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison61Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Energy Saver A/S Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 53 Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.7 = 61
No road tests of noise for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Cross Contact A/T +857Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Energy Saver A/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 64 51 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65
Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.1 = 57
No road tests of treadwear for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
62
Handling (owners)
Cross Contact A/T +1250Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Energy Saver A/S Reviews found online 62 50
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Cross Contact A/T | Michelin Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 55 |
| Dry | 64 | 56 |
| Wet | 64 | 54 |
| Snow | 53 | 54 |
| Comfort | 65 | 60 |
| Noise | – | 61 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 57 |
| Handling (owners) | 62 | 50 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
62
/ 100
Cross Contact A/T
55
/ 100
Energy Saver A/S
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Cross Contact A/T
Pros
- Excellent on-road comfort and handling with acceptable noise levels
- High potential longevity and mileage for many users, with sets lasting upwards of 50,000 to 80,000 km/miles
- Competent dry and wet performance on paved surfaces
Cons
- Susceptibility to punctures and fragile sidewalls reported by some drivers
- Rapid, premature tread wear experienced by certain users
- Poor traction and spinning issues in winter conditions such as snow and ice
Tire B Energy Saver A/S
Pros
- High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
- Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
- Reliable dry weather traction for some users
Cons
- Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Cross Contact A/T | B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
62
/ 100
Continental Cross Contact A/T
55
/ 100
Michelin Energy Saver A/S
Winner: Continental Cross Contact A/T — better handling, wet and dry. Where the Michelin Energy Saver A/S is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Continental Cross Contact A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Energy Saver A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 62 vs 50 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 64 vs 54 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 64 vs 56 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 65 vs 57 on treadwear.
Tire A · Continental Cross Contact A/T
Tire B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Cross Contact A/T or Energy Saver A/S?
Which is better in the wet, Cross Contact A/T or Energy Saver A/S?
Continental Cross Contact A/T, 64 vs 54 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Cross Contact A/T or Energy Saver A/S?
Continental Cross Contact A/T, 64 vs 56 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Cross Contact A/T or Energy Saver A/S?
Neither, by our numbers: 53 vs 54 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Cross Contact A/T or Energy Saver A/S?
Continental Cross Contact A/T, 65 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Cross Contact A/T or Energy Saver A/S?
Continental Cross Contact A/T, 65 vs 57 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology