Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 8 reviews
Continental CrossContact A/TR vs General Grabber A/T — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 17 owner reviews. How we score
CrossContact A/TR is ahead, 71–64
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 17 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
CrossContact A/TR +864Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR Grabber A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 74 62 CrossContact A/TR: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 72
Grabber A/T: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 61.7 = 64
No road tests of dry for CrossContact A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
73
Wet
CrossContact A/TR +766Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR Grabber A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 74 64 CrossContact A/TR: 60% × 72.7 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 73
Grabber A/T: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 63.9 = 66
No road tests of wet for CrossContact A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison64Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR Grabber A/T Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 60 Grabber A/T: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 64
No road tests of snow for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
66
Comfort
CrossContact A/TR +462Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR Grabber A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 65 59 CrossContact A/TR: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.4 = 66
Grabber A/T: 40% × 66.8 (est.) + 60% × 59.3 = 62
No road tests of comfort for CrossContact A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Treadwear
CrossContact A/TR +364Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR Grabber A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 67 63 CrossContact A/TR: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 67
Grabber A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
71
Handling (owners)
CrossContact A/TR +863Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR Grabber A/T Reviews found online 71 63
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact A/TR | General Grabber A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 64 |
| Dry | 72 | 64 |
| Wet | 73 | 66 |
| Snow | – | 64 |
| Comfort | 66 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
CrossContact A/TR
Grabber A/T
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CrossContact A/TR
Pros
- Exceptional tread wear and mileage longevity, with multiple users reporting over 70,000 to 80,000 miles (or 130,000 km) of use.
- Impressive dry grip and confident handling.
- Strong performance in snow and winter conditions, with some users highlighting exceptional traction on ice and steep gradients.
Cons
- A stiffer, more jarring, and less comfortable ride quality compared to competing all-terrain tires.
- Mixed feedback regarding hydroplaning resistance and heavy winter snow usage.
- Potential customer service and warranty claim challenges regarding premature tread wear.
Tire B Grabber A/T
Pros
- Excellent off-road traction on mud, grass, gravel, and farm tracks
- Good performance in snow and winter conditions
- Reasonably quiet and smooth on-road manners compared to more aggressive alternatives
Cons
- Poor or slippery grip on wet tarmac, raising safety concerns for some users
- Balancing issues reported by multiple owners
- Weak sidewall durability or vulnerability to punctures on low-profile applications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact A/TR | B · General Grabber A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 35 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 600 - 680 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental CrossContact A/TR
General Grabber A/T
Winner: Continental CrossContact A/TR — better dry, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental CrossContact A/TR rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional. General Grabber A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental CrossContact A/TR scores 72 vs 64 on dry.
Continental CrossContact A/TR scores 71 vs 63 on handling.
Continental CrossContact A/TR scores 73 vs 66 on wet.
Continental CrossContact A/TR scores 66 vs 62 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
CrossContact A/TR or Grabber A/T?
Which is better in the wet, CrossContact A/TR or Grabber A/T?
Continental CrossContact A/TR, 73 vs 66 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact A/TR or Grabber A/T?
Continental CrossContact A/TR, 72 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, CrossContact A/TR or Grabber A/T?
Continental CrossContact A/TR, 66 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, CrossContact A/TR or Grabber A/T?
Continental CrossContact A/TR, 67 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology