Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact A/TR vs General Grabber A/T — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 17 owner reviews. How we score

CrossContact A/TR is ahead, 71–64

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber A/T
Tire BGeneral

Grabber A/T

All-Terrain tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 17 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    CrossContact A/TR +8
    64
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact A/TRGrabber A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7462

    CrossContact A/TR: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 72

    Grabber A/T: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 61.7 = 64

    No road tests of dry for CrossContact A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 73

    Wet

    CrossContact A/TR +7
    66
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact A/TRGrabber A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7464

    CrossContact A/TR: 60% × 72.7 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 73

    Grabber A/T: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 63.9 = 66

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    64
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact A/TRGrabber A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–60

    Grabber A/T: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 64

    No road tests of snow for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    CrossContact A/TR +4
    62
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact A/TRGrabber A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6559

    CrossContact A/TR: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.4 = 66

    Grabber A/T: 40% × 66.8 (est.) + 60% × 59.3 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for CrossContact A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 67

    Treadwear

    CrossContact A/TR +3
    64
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact A/TRGrabber A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6763

    CrossContact A/TR: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 67

    Grabber A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 71

    Handling (owners)

    CrossContact A/TR +8
    63
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact A/TRGrabber A/T
    Reviews found online7163
Scores at a glance
Continental CrossContact A/TR vs General Grabber A/T: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental CrossContact A/TRGeneral Grabber A/T
Relative Score 71 64
Dry 72 64
Wet 73 66
Snow – 64
Comfort 66 62
Treadwear 67 64
Handling (owners) 71 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

CrossContact A/TR

± 8

Grabber A/T

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact A/TR

Pros

  • Exceptional tread wear and mileage longevity, with multiple users reporting over 70,000 to 80,000 miles (or 130,000 km) of use.
  • Impressive dry grip and confident handling.
  • Strong performance in snow and winter conditions, with some users highlighting exceptional traction on ice and steep gradients.

Cons

  • A stiffer, more jarring, and less comfortable ride quality compared to competing all-terrain tires.
  • Mixed feedback regarding hydroplaning resistance and heavy winter snow usage.
  • Potential customer service and warranty claim challenges regarding premature tread wear.
All owner themes in the CrossContact A/TR review

Tire B Grabber A/T

Pros

  • Excellent off-road traction on mud, grass, gravel, and farm tracks
  • Good performance in snow and winter conditions
  • Reasonably quiet and smooth on-road manners compared to more aggressive alternatives

Cons

  • Poor or slippery grip on wet tarmac, raising safety concerns for some users
  • Balancing issues reported by multiple owners
  • Weak sidewall durability or vulnerability to punctures on low-profile applications
All owner themes in the Grabber A/T review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact A/TR B · General Grabber A/T
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available35—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG600 - 680 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact A/TR

General Grabber A/T

Winner: Continental CrossContact A/TR — better dry, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental CrossContact A/TR rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional. General Grabber A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental CrossContact A/TR scores 72 vs 64 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental CrossContact A/TR scores 71 vs 63 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental CrossContact A/TR scores 73 vs 66 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental CrossContact A/TR scores 66 vs 62 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact A/TR
Tire B · General Grabber A/T

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossContact A/TR or Grabber A/T?

Which is better in the wet, CrossContact A/TR or Grabber A/T?

Continental CrossContact A/TR, 73 vs 66 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact A/TR or Grabber A/T?

Continental CrossContact A/TR, 72 vs 64 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossContact A/TR or Grabber A/T?

Continental CrossContact A/TR, 66 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossContact A/TR or Grabber A/T?

Continental CrossContact A/TR, 67 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology