tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact A/TR vs General Grabber A/TX — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 373 owner reviews. How we score

CrossContact A/TR leads, 71–69 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · CrossContact A/TR or Grabber A/TX on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber A/TX
Tire BGeneral

Grabber A/TX

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 373 reviews

“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    CrossContact A/TR +4
    68
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact A/TRGrabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7468

    CrossContact A/TR: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 72

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 68

    No road tests of dry for CrossContact A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 73

    Wet

    Level
    73
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact A/TRGrabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7474

    CrossContact A/TR: 60% × 72.7 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 73

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 73

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    68
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact A/TRGrabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online–67

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 68

    No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    CrossContact A/TR +5
    61
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact A/TRGrabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6558

    CrossContact A/TR: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.4 = 66

    Grabber A/TX: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58.1 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for CrossContact A/TR or Grabber A/TX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    64
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact A/TRGrabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–60

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Grabber A/TX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Grabber A/TX +3
    70
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact A/TRGrabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6772

    CrossContact A/TR: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 67

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    CrossContact A/TR +12
    59
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact A/TRGrabber A/TX
    Reviews found online7159
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental CrossContact A/TRGeneral Grabber A/TX
Relative Score 71 69
Dry 72 68
Wet 73 73
Snow – 68
Comfort 66 61
Noise – 64
Treadwear 67 70
Handling (owners) 71 59

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

CrossContact A/TR

± 7

Grabber A/TX

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact A/TR

Pros

  • Exceptional tread wear and mileage longevity, with multiple users reporting over 70,000 to 80,000 miles (or 130,000 km) of use.
  • Impressive dry grip and confident handling.
  • Strong performance in snow and winter conditions, with some users highlighting exceptional traction on ice and steep gradients.

Cons

  • A stiffer, more jarring, and less comfortable ride quality compared to competing all-terrain tires.
  • Mixed feedback regarding hydroplaning resistance and heavy winter snow usage.
  • Potential customer service and warranty claim challenges regarding premature tread wear.
All owner themes in the CrossContact A/TR review

Tire B Grabber A/TX

Pros

  • Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
  • Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
  • Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling

Cons

  • Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
  • Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
  • Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
All owner themes in the Grabber A/TX review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental CrossContact A/TR

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

General Grabber A/TX

Positive

Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.

r/4Runner ·16 upvotes ·2020-10-11

“Swapped OEM 265/65R17 for Grabber A/Tx 265/70R17 On 2018 Wheels”
f150forum.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by Teddydogno1 I think I am going to get these for my 2002 SCab FX4. Price and rating both seem very good. How do you like them (those that have them)? Rob I like them a lot. I have about 12000 miles on them. They have a little noise, but not bad if that is a factor for you. I am running them at 38 psi and the ride is a little softer. If I had one complaint, I run a lot of gravel roads and rocks will stick in the tread. When I get up to highway speed the rocks come out and come out hard. I have factory rims so my tires don't stick out beyond the fenders except a tiny bit. I have a couple nice rock chips on the side of my truck from that.”
r/Crosstrek ·12 upvotes ·2025-04-12

“Tire recommendations! Current 215/75R-15 GENERAL GRABBER A/TX SL I am going to need new tires and I am wondering if I should buy a different tire than what I currently have. Overall these tires have been great and drive pretty well in the snow in VT and NY. Drive NJ roads year round aswell. Any recommendations?! Much appreciate any advice!! Read more”
Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Highway road noise#Standard load availability#Fuel economy impact#Rock retention and throwing#Ride quality and PSI

Based on 37 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact A/TR B · General Grabber A/TX
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available3544
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 22″
Tread depth10 - 12/32″14 - 17/32″
UTQG600 - 680 A A - B640 A A - B
SidewallBlack Side WallBlack Side Wall - Raised White Lettering
Max pressure44 - 51 psi35 - 80 psi
Sizes in common1313

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact A/TR

General Grabber A/TX

Narrow edge: Continental CrossContact A/TR — better handling, comfort and dry. Pick the General Grabber A/TX if treadwear matters most to you. Continental CrossContact A/TR rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental CrossContact A/TR scores 71 vs 59 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental CrossContact A/TR scores 66 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental CrossContact A/TR scores 72 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

General Grabber A/TX scores 70 vs 67 on treadwear.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact A/TR
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · General Grabber A/TX
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossContact A/TR or Grabber A/TX?

Which is better in the wet, CrossContact A/TR or Grabber A/TX?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact A/TR or Grabber A/TX?

Continental CrossContact A/TR, 72 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossContact A/TR or Grabber A/TX?

Continental CrossContact A/TR, 66 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossContact A/TR or Grabber A/TX?

General Grabber A/TX, 70 vs 67 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology