Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact LX Sport vs Nitto NT555 G2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 561 + 411 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: CrossContact LX Sport 57, NT555 G2 58.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental CrossContact LX Sport
± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 561 reviews

“Gouge on sidewall It’s a continental cross contact LX sport 235/65 R18. Got them last year but hit a sharp curb the other day. Not sure if I’m seeing any cords, there’s some white streaks deep in the gouge but it all seems in tact. Just need to drive this car for 3 more days, is it safe?”

Nitto NT555 G2
Tire BNitto

NT555 G2

Summer

± 7

Tests 60 · 2 tests Owners 59 · 411 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    CrossContact LX Sport +3
    56
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportNT555 G2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 62 (est.)49
    Reviews found online5565

    CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 59

    NT555 G2: 60% × 49.4 + 40% × 65.3 = 56

    No road tests of dry for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 61

    Wet

    CrossContact LX Sport +10
    51
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportNT555 G2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 63 (est.)48
    Reviews found online5757

    CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.1 = 61

    NT555 G2: 60% × 47.7 + 40% × 56.7 = 51

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 62

    Snow

    CrossContact LX Sport +15
    47
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportNT555 G2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online5733

    CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 62

    NT555 G2: 60% × 56.8 (est.) + 40% × 33.4 = 47

    No road tests of snow for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for NT555 G2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    NT555 G2 +5
    67
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportNT555 G2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5866

    CrossContact LX Sport: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 58 = 62

    NT555 G2: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 66.1 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX Sport or NT555 G2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 64

    Noise

    NT555 G2 +2
    66
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportNT555 G2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6165

    CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 64

    NT555 G2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 66

    No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX Sport or NT555 G2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 40

    Treadwear

    NT555 G2 +36
    76
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportNT555 G2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 51 (est.)83
    Reviews found online2366

    CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 51 (est.) + 40% × 22.6 = 40

    NT555 G2: 60% × 83.4 + 40% × 65.9 = 76

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 46

    Handling (owners)

    NT555 G2 +18
    64
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportNT555 G2
    Reviews found online4664
Scores at a glance
Continental CrossContact LX Sport vs Nitto NT555 G2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX SportNitto NT555 G2
Relative Score 57 58
Dry 59 56
Wet 61 51
Snow 62 47
Comfort 62 67
Noise 64 66
Treadwear 40 76
Handling (owners) 46 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

CrossContact LX Sport

± 7

NT555 G2

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact LX Sport

Pros

  • Low road noise and exceptional cabin comfort
  • Strong handling and reliable grip in wet and dry conditions
  • Confident performance in light snow and winter weather

Cons

  • Disappointing tread life and faster-than-expected wear
  • Occasional reports of reduced traction in heavy mud or specific slick conditions
  • Higher price point relative to the longevity experienced by some drivers
All owner themes in the CrossContact LX Sport review

Tire B NT555 G2

Pros

  • Aggressive, visually appealing tread pattern and sidewall design
  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands like Michelin or Pirelli
  • Long-lasting tread life and slow wear rates for a summer performance tire

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather traction, with multiple users reporting hydroplaning and a slippery feel in the rain
  • Lack of straight-line traction and wheel spin under heavy acceleration, especially on high-horsepower RWD vehicles
  • Subpar performance in cooler temperatures or cold conditions, requiring heat to grip properly
All owner themes in the NT555 G2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental CrossContact LX Sport

Mixed

Community opinion on the Continental Cross Contact LX Sport is mixed, with some drivers praising its comfort, balance of control, and low road noise. However, many owners express dissatisfaction with rapid tread wear, flaking or chunking, poor wet traction, and shallow initial tread depth. Several users consider replacing them early with options like Michelin CrossClimate or Defender models.

mbworld.org

“It’s a compromise between ‘comfort’ ride and safety and handling. Advance driving course will add around 8psi cold. I find on any rim size additional 4psi makes a difference. Why ? Under heavy braking the tyre collapsed in the middle, by running higher inflation the complete width of the type is on the road, better braking efficiency - if under inflated only the outer edges keep in contact with the ground, causing less efficiency and longer distance to stop. Higher inflation also ensures tyre does not warp and twist on rim when turning. Too much inflation is just as bad, only the middle touches road - less braking efficiency and wear out tyre quicker. OEM recommended pressure is for comfort and sometimes sees increased edge wear over life of tyre. Regular tyre rotation and wheel balance and alignment will maximise tyre life. Try for yourself, But I have found around 4psi extra when cold is optimum.”

r/crv ·3 upvotes ·2026-04-30

“2024 EXL Tire Review - Continental Cross Contact LX Sport 245/60/18 Replaced the oem tires with only 10,000 miles with these after reading reviews and the price point. Very happy with them, better handling and feel with less road noise and much better on grooved pavement. The oem Bridgestones wandered badly on grooved pavement. Highly recommended. Read more”

bobistheoilguy.com ·2022-08-25

“Trav- someone I know has these and likes them, good experience so far. When I look on TR, DT it does not show the 235-55-20 as an option. Maybe just current supply issues? I tried the Toyo website directly and it doesn't list them as being an option either. The Celsius Sport, yes, but not the Celsius CUV? The Walmart link doesn't have a purchase option for me just "show nearby availability" but none show. Your thoughts on the Celsius "Sport" if he was looking at that? My experience was with Continental CrossContact LX Sport and Bridgestone Dueler H/P Sport AS. They were both good dry and wet, wore out fast, total safety hazards in the snow, like plastic sled or saucer on a snowy hill bad. For me if winter/snow is a possibility and need reliable traction, anything tire that says sport is not.”

Top themes
#premature tread wear#wet weather traction#OEM tire replacement#tire inflation pressure#ride comfort and road noise#EV efficiency comparison

Based on 26 community posts

Tire B

Nitto NT555 G2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX Sport B · Nitto NT555 G2
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3988
Rim diameters16″ – 22″15″ – 22″
Tread depth9/32″10.2/32″
UTQG480 A A320 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi50 psi
Sizes in common55

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact LX Sport

Nitto NT555 G2

Too close to call: Continental CrossContact LX Sport and Nitto NT555 G2 are within 2 points overall. Continental CrossContact LX Sport is stronger on snow, wet and dry. Nitto NT555 G2 is stronger on treadwear, handling and comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nitto NT555 G2 scores 76 vs 40 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nitto NT555 G2 scores 64 vs 46 on handling.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental CrossContact LX Sport scores 62 vs 47 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental CrossContact LX Sport scores 61 vs 51 on wet.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX Sport
Tire B · Nitto NT555 G2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossContact LX Sport or NT555 G2?

Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX Sport or NT555 G2?

Continental CrossContact LX Sport, 61 vs 51 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX Sport or NT555 G2?

Continental CrossContact LX Sport, 59 vs 56 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, CrossContact LX Sport or NT555 G2?

Continental CrossContact LX Sport, 62 vs 47 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, CrossContact LX Sport or NT555 G2?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 66 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX Sport or NT555 G2?

Nitto NT555 G2, 67 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX Sport or NT555 G2?

Nitto NT555 G2, 76 vs 40 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology