Tests – · none yet Owners – · 1 review (needs 5)
Continental CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 9 road tests and 1 + 1,371 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 80 · 9 tests Owners 79 · 1,371 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested (wet braking)
“Loving my new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires and Enkei Raijin wheels”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison86Why this score
Source CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology Pilot Sport 4 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests – 86 Reviews found online – 86 Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 86 + 40% × 86.4 = 86
-
–
Wet
No comparison91Why this score
Source CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology Pilot Sport 4 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests – 94 Reviews found online – 87 Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 94 + 40% × 86.7 = 91
-
–
Comfort
No comparison64Why this score
Source CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology Pilot Sport 4 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 54 Reviews found online – 71 Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 40% × 54.2 + 60% × 71.2 = 64
-
–
Noise
No comparison58Why this score
Source CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology Pilot Sport 4 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests – 53 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 52.5 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 58
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
–
Treadwear
No comparison72Why this score
Source CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology Pilot Sport 4 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 77 Reviews found online – 65 Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 77.1 + 40% × 65.3 = 72
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison83Why this score
Source CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology Pilot Sport 4 SUV Reviews found online – 83 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison64Why this score
Source CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology Pilot Sport 4 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests – 64
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 81 |
| Dry | – | 86 |
| Wet | – | 91 |
| Comfort | – | 64 |
| Noise | – | 58 |
| Treadwear | – | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 83 |
| Efficiency | – | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology
Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Pros
- Outstanding grip and safety in both wet and dry conditions
- Precise steering response and enhanced cornering stability for heavy SUVs
- Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and overall handling
Cons
- Higher-than-average purchase price
- Increased road noise reported by some users as the tread wears down
- Faster tread wear and shorter mileage lifespan under aggressive driving or heavy vehicle loads
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Community sentiment toward the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV is generally very positive, with owners highlighting its strong grip, handling precision, and suitability for heavy performance SUVs. Users frequently compare it favorably to older Latitude Sport 3 and standard passenger tires, though they emphasize its summer-only limitation below 40°F and note trade-offs in price and tread life.
“Used Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV I am looking to buy these used Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires. They have 7+ mm thread left, DOT 0923. I am wondering why the two tires on the right are so rough / full of small holes, while the ones on the left are so smooth. Probably the right ones were on the front, but still what could this condition be indicating? I still haven't been to the shop to see them and feel how is the rubber, wanted to hear an advice first.”
“I'm not particularly worried about stuff like that, more wondering if I could eke any more grip out when accelerating hard in less than ideal conditions. The current PS4s give me no trouble braking, turning and driving through standing water, but they do struggle to put the power down at the minute.”
“Loving my new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires and Enkei Raijin wheels”
Based on 37 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology | B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Summer |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 65 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 23″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Only Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology