Tests 59 · 1 test Owners 79 · 26 reviews
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs General Grabber AT3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 2 road tests and 26 + 251 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: CrossContact LX25 and Grabber AT3 are level at 73.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 70 · 2 tests Owners 78 · 251 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 8 in 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (noise)
“How long have I got? Grabber at3s, plenty of tread but I’m seeing some cracks forming. Are these something I need to be concerned about imminently or am I safe to continue driving for a few more months?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
CrossContact LX25 +471Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 70 66 Reviews found online 83 78 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.8 = 75
Grabber AT3: 60% × 66.4 + 40% × 77.8 = 71
-
80
Wet
CrossContact LX25 +872Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 78 (est.) 68 Reviews found online 83 78 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.6 (est.) + 40% × 83.2 = 80
Grabber AT3: 60% × 68.3 + 40% × 78.2 = 72
No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
Grabber AT3 +2275Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 40 77 Reviews found online 72 73 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.2 + 40% × 71.6 = 53
Grabber AT3: 60% × 77.1 + 40% × 72.8 = 75
-
76
Comfort
CrossContact LX25 +175Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 79 77 CrossContact LX25: 40% × 71 (est.) + 60% × 79.4 = 76
Grabber AT3: 40% × 70.5 (est.) + 60% × 77.4 = 75
No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
No road tests of comfort for Grabber AT3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
-
71
Noise
Grabber AT3 +172Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 77 ≈ 66 (est.) CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.3 = 71
Grabber AT3: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 72
No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Grabber AT3. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
72
Treadwear
Grabber AT3 +476Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 76 82 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72
Grabber AT3: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 81.6 = 76
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber AT3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
79
Handling (owners)
CrossContact LX25 +574Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Grabber AT3 Reviews found online 79 74 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison52Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 52
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact LX25 | General Grabber AT3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 73 |
| Dry | 75 | 71 |
| Wet | 80 | 72 |
| Snow | 53 | 75 |
| Comfort | 76 | 75 |
| Noise | 71 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 76 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 74 |
| Efficiency | – | 52 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
CrossContact LX25
Grabber AT3
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | CrossContact LX25 | Grabber AT3 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 93% #2/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | 95% #4/7 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] | – | Different tests |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 68% #3/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | 99% #2/5 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/3 Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | #3/5 2025 Wybór Kierowców Off Road Tire Test R18 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CrossContact LX25
Pros
- Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
- Significantly improved wet and snow traction
- Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness
Cons
- Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
- Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
- Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
Tire B Grabber AT3
Pros
- Exceptionally low road noise for an all-terrain tire, maintaining high highway comfort
- Strong on-road handling and grip in both dry and wet conditions
- Reliable light off-road traction, particularly on grass, gravel, dirt tracks, and light mud
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to vulnerability against sharp stones, flints, or tree stumps
- Subpar performance on compacted snow and ice compared to dedicated winter tires
- Tread can pack up and struggle in deep, heavy, or extremely soft mud
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental CrossContact LX25
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
General Grabber AT3
Community feedback for the General Grabber AT3 is largely positive, with owners highlighting strong tread longevity, smooth ride comfort, and low road noise. Drivers also appreciate its off-road capability in gravel, mud, and snow, though occasional questions arise regarding sidewall damage, cracking, and tire sizing fitment.
“I have ran the cooper at3 and they are great for a mostly highway tire. I just put the grabber a/tx on but don't have many miles on them yet, went with then because they are more aggressive than the at3 but not as heavy and crazy like my previous st maxx. I have no experience with falken. For what you need it if you're tires the AT3s will be good, they are not loud. My new generals have a bit more noise.”
“I feel not many people in this group will like this but I'll post for the hell of it. Some 215/60/17 general grabber at3 I fitted to my A4 to test if it would fit from the standard 225/50/17”
“Only got 32K on them and installed General Grabber AT3. Took a 2000 mile trip and I think the all terrain tires ride better and look bad ***.”
Based on 20 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact LX25 | B · General Grabber AT3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 40 | 77 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 740 A A - B | 560 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 23 | 23 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental CrossContact LX25
General Grabber AT3
Too close to call: Continental CrossContact LX25 and General Grabber AT3 are within 2 points overall. Continental CrossContact LX25 is stronger on wet and dry. General Grabber AT3 is stronger on snow and treadwear.
General Grabber AT3 scores 75 vs 53 on snow.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 80 vs 72 on wet.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 75 vs 71 on dry.
General Grabber AT3 scores 76 vs 72 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
CrossContact LX25 or Grabber AT3?
Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or Grabber AT3?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 80 vs 72 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or Grabber AT3?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 75 vs 71 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, CrossContact LX25 or Grabber AT3?
General Grabber AT3, 75 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, CrossContact LX25 or Grabber AT3?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 72 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or Grabber AT3?
Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 75 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or Grabber AT3?
General Grabber AT3, 76 vs 72 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology