tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Pirelli Scorpion Zero — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 26 + 485 owner reviews. How we score

CrossContact LX25 is ahead, 73–58

Check price on Amazon · CrossContact LX25 or Scorpion Zero on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pirelli Scorpion Zero
Tire BPirelli

Scorpion Zero

All-Season

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 485 reviews

“I bought a set of 20” M-wheels when I my X5 was at around 2k miles. I had fitted Pirelli scorpion zero runflats on it. At 65k miles, they had to be replaced due to compound cracking, thread was still at 5 to 6/32. I think they served me well.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    CrossContact LX25 +14
    61
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Scorpion Zero
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online8357

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.7 = 75

    Scorpion Zero: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57 = 61

    No road tests of dry for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 80

    Wet

    CrossContact LX25 +19
    61
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Scorpion Zero
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 78 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online8357

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.6 (est.) + 40% × 83.2 = 80

    Scorpion Zero: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 61

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    Scorpion Zero +3
    56
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Scorpion Zero
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests40≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7246

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.2 + 40% × 71.6 = 53

    Scorpion Zero: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 46.4 = 56

    No road tests of snow for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 76

    Comfort

    CrossContact LX25 +21
    55
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Scorpion Zero
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7949

    CrossContact LX25: 40% × 70.9 (est.) + 60% × 79.4 = 76

    Scorpion Zero: 40% × 64.7 (est.) + 60% × 49 = 55

    No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 71

    Noise

    CrossContact LX25 +7
    64
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Scorpion Zero
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7760

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.3 = 71

    Scorpion Zero: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 64

    No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25 or Scorpion Zero. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    CrossContact LX25 +22
    50
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Scorpion Zero
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online7640

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72

    Scorpion Zero: 60% × 56.9 (est.) + 40% × 39.7 = 50

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 79

    Handling (owners)

    CrossContact LX25 +27
    52
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Scorpion Zero
    Reviews found online7952
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Pirelli Scorpion Zero
Relative Score 73 58
Dry 75 61
Wet 80 61
Snow 53 56
Comfort 76 55
Noise 71 64
Treadwear 72 50
Handling (owners) 79 52

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

CrossContact LX25

± 8

Scorpion Zero

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact LX25

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
  • Significantly improved wet and snow traction
  • Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness

Cons

  • Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
  • Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
  • Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
All owner themes in the CrossContact LX25 review

Tire B Scorpion Zero

Pros

  • Low road noise and enhanced ride comfort
  • Strong dry and wet road handling and stability
  • Good light snow and off-road capability (mud/grass)

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear reported by some aggressive or high-horsepower drivers
  • Occasional complaints regarding poor wet weather traction or aquaplaning
  • High price point relative to some competitors
All owner themes in the Scorpion Zero review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental CrossContact LX25

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Pirelli Scorpion Zero

Mixed

Community sentiment for the Pirelli Scorpion Zero family is mixed, with users frequently praising its smooth ride, dry and wet traction, and reduced road noise, particularly on newer Plus 3 and EV-focused variants. However, substantial criticism centers on rapid treadwear, with many owners reporting premature wear well under 25,000 to 30,000 miles, alongside complaints regarding warranty claims and inner foam insulation issues. While some drivers find good longevity and rim protection, others view the tire as short-lived and loud once worn.

r/ModelX ·2 upvotes ·2026-09-20

“I used Pirelli Scorpion Zero AS Plus 3”
audiworld.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by MurrayA4 ... Is a very logical conclusion to reach.The spread between "ultra high perf." tires and many "touring" tires has shrunk a great deal.Sounds like the Verde is pretty respectable .Any idea what the UTQG ratings are on those ? I'm lazy ! Pirelli Scorpion Verde A/S 265/40/R21 - 105V (150mph) - UTQG 600AA - 34lbs, 12/32" Tread Depth, 29.3" Diameter Pirelli Scorpion Zero A/S Plus 265/40/R21 - 105Y (186mph) - UTQG 500AA - 33lbs, 10/32" Tread Depth, 29.3 Diameter I think if you tended more towards summer tires and/or lived in a dry-ish climate and could get a good price, the Zero A/S is a good tire. You might only get 30K out of them on a heavy performance SUV but compared to more expensive options the differences seem minimal. Personally, on a truck/SUV I've never experienced a tire rated 600AA have as good performance/stickiness (combined with long treadlife) as the Verdes...”
r/PorscheMacan ·1 upvote ·2026-09-25

“I have a 2022 base model with 20in wheels and bought it with Michelin latitude tour HPs and had one in bad shape and just replaced all four with Pirelli scorpion zero AS plus. So far so good but haven’t experienced snow yet. I’m questioning the quality of the Michelins considering the car is 4 years old and the prior owner had replaced 3/4 of them at differing points, but who knows I guess it could have been a number of different things. The Pirellis were also cheaper than the Michelins.”
Top themes
#rapid treadwear life#smooth quiet ride#PNCS foam insulation#EV tire performance#wet dry traction#warranty claim issues#OEM tire replacement

Based on 53 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Pirelli Scorpion Zero
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available4049
Rim diameters16″ – 22″18″ – 23″
Tread depth10 - 12/32″9/32″
UTQG740 A A - B500 A A
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure44 - 51 psi51 psi
Sizes in common1616

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact LX25

Pirelli Scorpion Zero

Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better handling, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Pirelli Scorpion Zero if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 79 vs 52 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 72 vs 50 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 76 vs 55 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 80 vs 61 on wet.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Pirelli Scorpion Zero
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossContact LX25 or Scorpion Zero?

Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or Scorpion Zero?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 80 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or Scorpion Zero?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 75 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, CrossContact LX25 or Scorpion Zero?

Pirelli Scorpion Zero, 56 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, CrossContact LX25 or Scorpion Zero?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 71 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or Scorpion Zero?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 76 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or Scorpion Zero?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 72 vs 50 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology