Tests 59 · 1 test Owners 79 · 26 reviews
Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 26 + 4 owner reviews. How we score
CrossContact LX25 leads, 73–70 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 1 test Owners 67 · 4 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (wet handling)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
CrossContact LX25 +372Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Quatrac 5 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 70 74 Reviews found online 83 69 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.8 = 75
Quatrac 5 SUV: 60% × 74 + 40% × 69.2 = 72
-
80
Wet
CrossContact LX25 +773Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Quatrac 5 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 78 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 83 69 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.6 (est.) + 40% × 83.2 = 80
Quatrac 5 SUV: 60% × 76 + 40% × 68.6 = 73
No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
Quatrac 5 SUV +1871Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Quatrac 5 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 40 72 Reviews found online 72 70 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.2 + 40% × 71.6 = 53
Quatrac 5 SUV: 60% × 72 + 40% × 69.5 = 71
-
76
Comfort
CrossContact LX25 +769Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Quatrac 5 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 79 69 CrossContact LX25: 40% × 71 (est.) + 60% × 79.4 = 76
Quatrac 5 SUV: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 69.1 = 69
No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
No road tests of comfort for Quatrac 5 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
-
71
Noise
CrossContact LX25 +962Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Quatrac 5 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 60 Reviews found online 77 ≈ 66 (est.) CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.3 = 71
Quatrac 5 SUV: 60% × 59.7 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 62
No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Quatrac 5 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
72
Treadwear
CrossContact LX25 +963Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Quatrac 5 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 76 61 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72
Quatrac 5 SUV: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Quatrac 5 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
79
Handling (owners)
CrossContact LX25 +1168Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Quatrac 5 SUV Reviews found online 79 68 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison72Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Quatrac 5 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact LX25 | Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 70 |
| Dry | 75 | 72 |
| Wet | 80 | 73 |
| Snow | 53 | 71 |
| Comfort | 76 | 69 |
| Noise | 71 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 68 |
| Efficiency | – | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
CrossContact LX25
Quatrac 5 SUV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | CrossContact LX25 | Quatrac 5 SUV | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 93% #2/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | 94% #2/8 · 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/3 Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | #4/8 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CrossContact LX25
Pros
- Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
- Significantly improved wet and snow traction
- Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness
Cons
- Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
- Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
- Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
Tire B Quatrac 5 SUV
Pros
- Excellent grip and confidence in heavy snow and icy rural roads
- Greatly improved wet handling and reduced stopping distances
- High level of ride comfort and low cabin noise
Cons
- Long-term wear remains unproven for drivers with very low mileage use
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact LX25 | B · Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 40 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 740 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental CrossContact LX25
Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV
Narrow edge: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better handling, noise and treadwear. Pick the Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV if snow matters most to you. Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV scores 71 vs 53 on snow.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 79 vs 68 on handling.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 71 vs 62 on noise.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 72 vs 63 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
CrossContact LX25 or Quatrac 5 SUV?
Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or Quatrac 5 SUV?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 80 vs 73 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or Quatrac 5 SUV?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 75 vs 72 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, CrossContact LX25 or Quatrac 5 SUV?
Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV, 71 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, CrossContact LX25 or Quatrac 5 SUV?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 71 vs 62 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or Quatrac 5 SUV?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 76 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or Quatrac 5 SUV?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 72 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology