Head-to-head Updated

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 4 road tests and 3,269 + 2,579 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate 2 SUV is ahead, 82–58

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental EcoContact 6

EcoContact 6

Summer

± 5

Tests 71 · 6 tests Owners 42 · 3,269 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (noise)

“For efficiency I would recommend continental ecocontact 6/7. I get around 11kw/100km in the city and 14-15kw/100km on the highway. Would recommend. RWD 19 inch wheels Not very good on a rainy road tho”

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Tire BMichelin

CrossClimate 2 SUV

All Season

± 5

Tests 87 · 4 tests Owners 82 · 2,579 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2023 SUV All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)

“Opinions please ... Michelin Primacy 4+ vs Michelin Cross Climate 2 SUV? Hi all ... I'm coming up to tyre replacement time so I've looking at what's around. Currently on Bridgestone Turanzas cos that's what came with the car, but I'm not hugely impressed with their lifespan, they seem to pick up sidewall damage easily and the tread seems to age quickly. Which is not much cop when all i do is commute round Southern England. I've pretty much settled on Michelin Primacy 4+ or Cross Climate 2 SUV but I'm having difficulty making a final decision. So I thought the hivemind might settle this: in your experience which one is best for lifespan and fuel consumption? Car is a 2018 SEAT Ateca with 18" alloys. Edit: well guys, I went with the Cross Climates, thanks for the advice!”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +23
    87
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 4 tests7786
    Reviews found online4588

    EcoContact 6: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 45.3 = 64

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 85.9 + 40% × 88.1 = 87

  2. 51

    Wet

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +33
    84
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 4 tests5384
    Reviews found online4785

    EcoContact 6: 60% × 53.5 + 40% × 46.6 = 51

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 83.9 + 40% × 84.7 = 84

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    90
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests–97
    Reviews found online–80

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 97.4 + 40% × 80.1 = 90

  4. 55

    Comfort

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +30
    85
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 65 (est.)81
    Reviews found online4988

    EcoContact 6: 40% × 64.8 (est.) + 60% × 49.2 = 55

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 40% × 81.3 + 60% × 87.5 = 85

    No road tests of comfort for EcoContact 6. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 77

    Noise

    EcoContact 6 +1
    76
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 4 tests8582
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    EcoContact 6: 60% × 84.8 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 77

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 81.7 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 76

    No owner ratings of noise for EcoContact 6 or CrossClimate 2 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 60

    Treadwear

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +10
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests79≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online3273

    EcoContact 6: 60% × 79.2 + 40% × 31.8 = 60

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 45

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +44
    89
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Reviews found online4589
  8. 100

    Efficiency

    EcoContact 6 +13
    87
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 3 tests10087
Scores at a glance
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental EcoContact 6Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Relative Score 58 82
Dry 64 87
Wet 51 84
Snow – 90
Comfort 55 85
Noise 77 76
Treadwear 60 70
Handling (owners) 45 89
Efficiency 100 87

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

EcoContact 6

± 5

CrossClimate 2 SUV

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEcoContact 6CrossClimate 2 SUVΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 96% #3/8 · 2026 Summer ECO Tyre Test 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 100% #2/8 · 2026 Summer ECO Tyre Test 83% #6/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 67% #8/8 · 2026 Summer ECO Tyre Test 87% #3/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 89% #8/8 · 2026 Summer ECO Tyre Test 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 83% #7/8 · 2026 Summer ECO Tyre Test 99% #3/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 96% #8/8 · 2026 Summer ECO Tyre Test 97% #6/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 94% #8/8 · 2026 Summer ECO Tyre Test 83% #6/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Noise Noise 100% #2/8 · 2026 Summer ECO Tyre Test 100% #3/9 · 2024 Motor SUV All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 100% #1/8 · 2026 Summer ECO Tyre Test 90% #2/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #6/8 2026 Auto Motor Und Sport Summer Tire Test R17 #1/7 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A EcoContact 6

Pros

  • Excellent fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
  • Low road noise and high cabin comfort
  • Good dry grip and stable handling under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear, especially on drive wheels
  • Subpar wet-weather grip and high susceptibility to aquaplaning
  • Shallow initial tread depth out of the box (approx. 6.0-6.5mm)
All owner themes in the EcoContact 6 review

Tire B CrossClimate 2 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional wet, ice, and snow traction that inspires winter-weather driving confidence
  • Significantly improved ride comfort and impact absorption over road imperfections
  • Impressive tread life and durability yielding long-term value

Cons

  • Higher initial purchase price compared to competitors
  • Minor fuel economy or range drop reported by some users, especially on hybrids and EVs
  • Occasional low-pitched or increased road noise at highway speeds (between 50-70 MPH)
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 SUV review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental EcoContact 6

Negative

Community sentiment regarding the Continental Eco Contact 6 is overwhelmingly negative, with users frequently criticizing its poor wet weather grip, braking performance, and handling. While praised occasionally for low rolling resistance and energy efficiency, owners repeatedly report premature tread wear, cracking, and chunking or delamination under normal driving conditions.

r/BMW ·2 upvotes ·2025-05-18

“Used Continental EcoContact 6 I have recently bought a G31 from 2022 which came with winter tires. Therefor I have bought summer tires which are used and were advertised as 5,5mm profile depth on each tire. I have measured each tire and am wondering which tire should be installed on which side and if front or rear would be better. Unfortunately there is no mark to show on which position they were on the previous owners car. Starting from outside moving inside I have measured the following millimetres: Tire 1: 5.51, 5.69, 5.85, 5.36 Tire 2: 5.40, 5.58, 5.71, 5.33 Tire 3: 5.59, 5.69, 5.79, 5.39 Tire 4: 5.38, 5.55, 5.73, 5.34 Seeing the numbers I would go with tire 2 and 4 on one axis und 1 and 3 on the other. Would that be a good idea and where should each pair go, front or rear? Is this even important at this low difference? I am happy for any advise. Thanks. Read more”

xc40forums.co.uk ·2023-01-17

“Just did not wish folk to think it may be dangerous. I do agree with you though, 38psi is high, and they go much higher as the tyre warms during driving.”

r/AutoTuga ·3 upvotes ·2026-08-20

“Desgaste anormal Continental EcoContact 6 Q — BMW X3 BMW X3 (~72.000 km, cerca de 1 ano e pouco). Já trocou os 4 pneus uma vez e vai agora para o segundo jogo. O primeiro conjunto começou a escamar / sair aos bocados (principalmente à frente). A marca assumiu e colocou pneus iguais (Continental EcoContact 6 Q). Agora, ao fim de cerca de 20.000 km, está a acontecer exatamente o mesmo à frente. Para piorar, após notar perda de pressão lenta atrás, fomos verificar e os dois pneus traseiros estão completamente comidos por dentro. Mais alguém com problemas crónicos de desgaste prematuro com este modelo de pneu ou comportamento semelhante no X3? Read more”

Top themes
#poor wet grip#energy efficiency#premature wear#tread chunking#factory OE fitment#replacement alternatives

Based on 29 community posts

Tire B

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Positive

Community members generally view the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV as a premium, dependable tire known for strong snow and dry performance, comfortable driving feel, and valuable 3PMS certification. Discussions frequently center around sizing availability, comparison to other models like the Primacy or standard CrossClimate 2, and choosing between specific speed or OEM ratings.

chrforums.uk ·2 upvotes ·2024-06-04

“I have the Michelin Cross Climate 2 SUV tyres . The many reviews I read approved of their performance in snowy conditions (if that is an issue where you live) and also their dry condition performance. They supposedly have a decent life span. They felt nicer to drive on than the Primacy tyres . They weren't cheap at about £170 each fitted but will give me some insurance about snowy conditions and will hopefully last until I swap the car in about 3 years.”

mbworld.org

“So here's the latest on Tires recommendations: (still dithering). Looking for smooth, soft ride, good mileage. I do have a mountain home; use ~30ish days during winter ski season, but mostly highway driving in Southern California ( don't disparage me for being a Californian. I cant stand the people or the government too lol. But it's a beautiful state). 2020 300GLC 4MATIC California car, 235/60 18H rating What will it be...?????? MICHELIN DEFENDER LTX M/S - seems like you guys are in favor. But hard to get. And the size is a 235/60 106T designation. Is the T speed max of 116mph not safe enough when OEM was an H rating 130mph? MICHELIN DEFENDER2. $238. Tire rack MICHELIN CrossClimate2 SUV tire rack $248. - hearing both good and bad. I heard they're soft and mileage tanks. Check out reviews on the Michelin USA official site. Pretty interesting. CONTINENTAL CROSSCONTACT LX25 $222. tire rack high rating? Also just got this from TireRack customer service CONTINENTAL EXTREMECONTACT DWS 06 PLUS. $238. Not sure, seems like TR is trying to promote them for Cont.”

r/tires ·1 upvote ·2025-11-12

“I just bought Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV for my Range Rover Sport and the reason is that I needed/wanted 3PMS certification. Also in my driving career I’ve always found Michelin better for everyday use compared to Pirelli which I instead preferred for performance and weekend fun.”

Top themes
#snow and dry performance#speed and OEM ratings#tire size availability#comfort and driving feel#comparison with Primacy#SUV versus standard version

Based on 8 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental EcoContact 6 B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available10435
Rim diameters13″ – 22″17″ – 22″
Tread depth7/32″—
UTQG320 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Sizes in common1414

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental EcoContact 6

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — better handling, wet and comfort. Pick the Continental EcoContact 6 if efficiency matters most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 89 vs 45 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 84 vs 51 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 85 vs 55 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 87 vs 64 on dry.

Tire A · Continental EcoContact 6
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

EcoContact 6 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, EcoContact 6 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 84 vs 51 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, EcoContact 6 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 87 vs 64 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, EcoContact 6 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 76 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, EcoContact 6 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 85 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, EcoContact 6 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 70 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, EcoContact 6 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Continental EcoContact 6, 100 vs 87 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology