Head-to-head Updated

Continental IceContact 3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 13 + 4 road tests and 3 + 2,571 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate 2 SUV is ahead, 84–71

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental IceContact 3

IceContact 3

Winter

± 5

Tests 79 · 13 tests Owners 65 · 3 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 19 in 2023 UTAC Large Winter Tire Test R16 (ice handling)

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Tire BMichelin

CrossClimate 2 SUV

All Season

± 5

Tests 87 · 4 tests Owners 83 · 2,571 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2023 SUV All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)

“I also live in Michigan and we get plenty of all four seasons. I put CC2s on my 2017 RAV4 Hybrid. They have handled all weather conditions up to and including moderate snow with aplomb. If I had to buy new tires tomorrow, I'd get another set.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +14
    87
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 3CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 4 tests7686
    Reviews found online6888

    IceContact 3: 60% × 76 + 40% × 67.5 = 73

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 86 + 40% × 88.3 = 87

  2. 73

    Wet

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +11
    84
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 3CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 4 tests7484
    Reviews found online7085

    IceContact 3: 60% × 74.4 + 40% × 69.6 = 73

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 83.9 + 40% × 84.6 = 84

  3. 79

    Snow

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +11
    90
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 3CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 4 tests8497
    Reviews found online7080

    IceContact 3: 60% × 84 + 40% × 70.3 = 79

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 97.4 + 40% × 79.7 = 90

  4. 76

    Comfort

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +10
    86
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 3CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 2 tests9682
    Reviews found online6288

    IceContact 3: 40% × 96.3 + 60% × 61.8 = 76

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 40% × 82.2 + 60% × 88 = 86

  5. 70

    Noise

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +6
    76
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 3CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 4 tests7282
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)

    IceContact 3: 60% × 72 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 70

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 82.4 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 76

    No owner ratings of noise for IceContact 3 or CrossClimate 2 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 57

    Treadwear

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +13
    70
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 3CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5173

    IceContact 3: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.3 = 57

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for IceContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 67

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +22
    89
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 3CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Reviews found online6789
  8. 67

    Efficiency

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +20
    87
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 3CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 3 tests6787
Scores at a glance
Continental IceContact 3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental IceContact 3Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Relative Score 71 84
Dry 73 87
Wet 73 84
Snow 79 90
Comfort 76 86
Noise 70 76
Treadwear 57 70
Handling (owners) 67 89
Efficiency 67 87

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

IceContact 3

± 5

CrossClimate 2 SUV

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryIceContact 3CrossClimate 2 SUVΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 97% #3/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 92% #5/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 99% #2/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 99% #3/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 100% #1/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 97% #6/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 99% #3/8 · The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 83% #6/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 100% #2/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 100% #2/8 · The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 100% #1/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Snow Traction Snow 95% #4/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 100% #1/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Exterior Noise Noise 97% #2/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 99% #3/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Noise Noise 99% #2/8 · The BEST Studded Tyres for 2025 100% #3/9 · 2024 Motor SUV All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 100% #1/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 90% #2/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #5/10 2025 UTAC Ivalo Studded Winter Tire Test R16 #1/7 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A IceContact 3

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and braking performance on packed snow and ice
  • Predictable handling in severe winter conditions
  • Strong performance on lake ice tracks

Cons

  • Premature stud wear or loss reported after moderate mileage
  • Potential for reduced stability in deeper snow (4-5 cm) depending on tire width
  • Unpredictable handling characteristics when paired with certain electronic stability control systems
All owner themes in the IceContact 3 review

Tire B CrossClimate 2 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional wet, ice, and snow traction that inspires winter-weather driving confidence
  • Significantly improved ride comfort and impact absorption over road imperfections
  • Impressive tread life and durability yielding long-term value

Cons

  • Higher initial purchase price compared to competitors
  • Minor fuel economy or range drop reported by some users, especially on hybrids and EVs
  • Occasional low-pitched or increased road noise at highway speeds (between 50-70 MPH)
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 SUV review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental IceContact 3

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Positive

Community sentiment for the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV is largely positive, with drivers consistently praising its exceptional grip and safety in snow, slush, and heavy rain. The primary trade-offs frequently cited are reduced fuel/range efficiency—particularly noted by EV owners—along with a premium price tag, directional rotation limitations, and mixed opinions on road noise.

Top themes
#Snow and winter traction#Wet grip and hydroplaning resistance#EV range and fuel efficiency impact#Road noise and ride comfort#High price and premium value#Directional tread rotation limits#Treadwear and longevity

Based on 97 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental IceContact 3 B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
CategoryWinterAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available—35
Rim diameters—17″ – 22″

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental IceContact 3

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — better handling, efficiency and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 89 vs 67 on handling.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 87 vs 67 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 87 vs 73 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 70 vs 57 on treadwear.

Tire A · Continental IceContact 3
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

IceContact 3 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, IceContact 3 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 84 vs 73 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, IceContact 3 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 87 vs 73 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, IceContact 3 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 90 vs 79 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, IceContact 3 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 76 vs 70 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, IceContact 3 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 86 vs 76 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, IceContact 3 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 70 vs 57 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, IceContact 3 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 87 vs 67 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology