Tests – · none yet Owners 44 · 8 reviews
Continental ProContact RX vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is ahead, 82–52
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 85 · 18 tests Owners 78 · 3,595 reviews
“F1 Asy 5s on my S204. I can confirm they are pretty decent and have coped well with the tarmac-ripping 154hp and 184 lbs-ft torque of the M274 fitted to my wagon”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
52
Dry
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +3284Why this score
Source ProContact RX Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) – 84 Reviews found online 44 83 -
54
Wet
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +3387Why this score
Source ProContact RX Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) – 91 Reviews found online 49 82 -
52
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source ProContact RX Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Reviews found online 41 – -
59
Comfort
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +2685Why this score
Source ProContact RX Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) – 93 Reviews found online 48 73 -
60
Noise
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +1272Why this score
Source ProContact RX Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) – 75 Reviews found online 51 67 -
48
Treadwear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +2876Why this score
Source ProContact RX Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) – 80 Reviews found online 36 70 -
45
Handling
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +3681Why this score
Source ProContact RX Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Reviews found online 45 81
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ProContact RX | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 52 | 82 |
| Dry | 52 | 84 |
| Wet | 54 | 87 |
| Snow | 52 | – |
| Comfort | 59 | 85 |
| Noise | 60 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 48 | 76 |
| Handling | 45 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
ProContact RX
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ProContact RX
Pros
- Reasonable tread life for an OEM EV tire given proper maintenance
- Cost-effective alternative compared to other expensive OEM options
- Acceptable dry road performance under normal driving conditions
Cons
- Rapid tread wear leading to premature replacement, particularly on heavy vehicles
- Subpar grip in wet and snowy weather conditions
- Concerns regarding structural durability, including reported sidewall separation
Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip
- Precise steering response and high-speed stability
- Strong value for money compared to tier-one rivals
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear for some aggressive drivers
- Notable road noise on coarse or concrete road surfaces
- Stiffer sidewalls can lead to a harsher ride quality on certain vehicles
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental ProContact RX
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Community members generally view the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 very positively, frequently praising its wet grip, cold weather performance, and steering feel when compared to rivals like Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and Pirelli P Zero. While some users find them exceptionally quiet, others note moderate road noise or low-speed scrubbing on full lock.
“2024 J1.1 GTS Sport Turismo on 21" Spyder RS wheels here. Went from Pirelli PZero's to NF1 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5's recently. They don't seem any louder than the PZero's, dry grip seems about the same, as does comfort. Wet grip and performance in cold conditions (I'm in Scotland, UK) over the PZero's is noticeably better. Very little in the way of the Ackerman effect in cold temperatures, compared to the PZero's which made an awful noise and skipped badly when turning at slow speeds, pulling out of junctions. Will see how they do wear rate wise, PZero's had about 2.5 to 3mm left at 16k miles. Anything approaching that on the ASY5's would be good. Unfortunately on the J1.1 on 21"'s the choice is essentially PZero's or ASY5's. Which is disappointing as I had PS4S's and CSC7's on my previous cars (G81 M3 and M340i Touring) and they were fantastic.”
“I have them fitted in both my cars (Audi A6 and CLK350). Neither had the performance of your AMG but I can confirm they are the best tyres I’ve ever had in terms of grip and feel.”
Based on 13 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ProContact RX | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 24 | 64 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 21″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 7 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 400 - 540 A - AA A - B | 300 - 500 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Black Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ProContact RX
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 81 vs 45 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 87 vs 54 on wet.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 84 vs 52 on dry.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 76 vs 48 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.