Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 25 reviews
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental PureContact LS vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 25 + 7 owner reviews. How we score
PureContact LS is ahead, 69–59
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 7 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
PureContact LS +663Why this score
Source PureContact LS Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 70 60 PureContact LS: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 69
Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 63
No road tests of dry for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
72
Wet
PureContact LS +1359Why this score
Source PureContact LS Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 73 55 PureContact LS: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 72
Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 54.6 = 59
No road tests of wet for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Snow
PureContact LS +958Why this score
Source PureContact LS Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 64 50 PureContact LS: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 67
Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 49.9 = 58
No road tests of snow for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
59
Comfort
PureContact LS +257Why this score
Source PureContact LS Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 55 52 PureContact LS: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 54.7 = 59
Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season: 40% × 65.9 (est.) + 60% × 51.8 = 57
No road tests of comfort for PureContact LS or Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Noise
PureContact LS +365Why this score
Source PureContact LS Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 71 63 PureContact LS: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 68
Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65
No road tests of noise for PureContact LS or Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Treadwear
PureContact LS +1355Why this score
Source PureContact LS Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 69 48 PureContact LS: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 68
Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.4 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
70
Handling (owners)
PureContact LS +1753Why this score
Source PureContact LS Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season Reviews found online 70 53
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental PureContact LS | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 59 |
| Dry | 69 | 63 |
| Wet | 72 | 59 |
| Snow | 67 | 58 |
| Comfort | 59 | 57 |
| Noise | 68 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 70 | 53 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
PureContact LS
Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A PureContact LS
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong wet and dry traction with reliable handling
- Good balance of everyday comfort and long treadlife
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to less responsive or wandering handling during aggressive cornering
- Develops temporary flat spotting when parked, causing morning vibrations
- Poor winter performance, particularly lacking traction on snow and ice despite being an all-season tire
Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season
Pros
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality with minimal road noise
- Reliable traction on dry and wet surfaces
- Competent performance in light snow and winter conditions
Cons
- Rapid tread wear reported by certain users, especially on the shoulders
- Shorter overall lifespan compared to some original equipment tire alternatives
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental PureContact LS | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Ultra High Performance All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 700 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 70,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental PureContact LS
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season
Winner: Continental PureContact LS — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental PureContact LS scores 70 vs 53 on handling.
Continental PureContact LS scores 72 vs 59 on wet.
Continental PureContact LS scores 68 vs 55 on treadwear.
Continental PureContact LS scores 67 vs 58 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
PureContact LS or Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season?
Which is better in the wet, PureContact LS or Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season?
Continental PureContact LS, 72 vs 59 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, PureContact LS or Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season?
Continental PureContact LS, 69 vs 63 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, PureContact LS or Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season?
Continental PureContact LS, 67 vs 58 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, PureContact LS or Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season?
Continental PureContact LS, 68 vs 65 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, PureContact LS or Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season?
Neither, by our numbers: 59 vs 57 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, PureContact LS or Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season?
Continental PureContact LS, 68 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology