tirewheelguide

Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 is discontinued — replaced by Hankook Dynapro HT RH12. Compare Dynapro HT RH12 with PureContact LS

Head-to-head Updated

Continental PureContact LS vs Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 25 + 3 owner reviews. How we score

PureContact LS is ahead, 70–57

Check price on Amazon · PureContact LS or Dynapro AS RH03 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    PureContact LS +15
    56
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSDynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7349

    PureContact LS: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 56

    No road tests of dry for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 73

    Wet

    PureContact LS +16
    57
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSDynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7453

    PureContact LS: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 73

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 57

    No road tests of wet for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 67

    Snow

    PureContact LS +12
    55
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSDynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6445

    PureContact LS: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 67

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 44.8 = 55

    No road tests of snow for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    PureContact LS +6
    59
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSDynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6148

    PureContact LS: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 65

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 48.3 = 59

    No road tests of comfort for PureContact LS or Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    PureContact LS +9
    61
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSDynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7351

    PureContact LS: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 70

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 61

    No road tests of noise for PureContact LS or Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    PureContact LS +8
    60
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSDynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6956

    PureContact LS: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 68

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 60

    No road tests of treadwear for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 73

    Handling (owners)

    PureContact LS +24
    49
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSDynapro AS RH03
    Reviews found online7349
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental PureContact LSHankook Dynapro AS RH03
Relative Score 70 57
Dry 71 56
Wet 73 57
Snow 67 55
Comfort 65 59
Noise 70 61
Treadwear 68 60
Handling (owners) 73 49

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

PureContact LS

Dynapro AS RH03

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A PureContact LS

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong wet and dry traction with reliable handling
  • Good balance of everyday comfort and long treadlife

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can lead to less responsive or wandering handling during aggressive cornering
  • Develops temporary flat spotting when parked, causing morning vibrations
  • Poor winter performance, particularly lacking traction on snow and ice despite being an all-season tire
All owner themes in the PureContact LS review

Tire B Dynapro AS RH03

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental PureContact LS B · Hankook Dynapro AS RH03
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Tread depth10/32″14/32″
UTQG700 A A—
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi80 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental PureContact LS

Hankook Dynapro AS RH03

Winner: Continental PureContact LS — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental PureContact LS scores 73 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental PureContact LS scores 73 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental PureContact LS scores 71 vs 56 on dry.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental PureContact LS scores 67 vs 55 on snow.

Tire A · Continental PureContact LS
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro AS RH03
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

PureContact LS or Dynapro AS RH03?

Which is better in the wet, PureContact LS or Dynapro AS RH03?

Continental PureContact LS, 73 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, PureContact LS or Dynapro AS RH03?

Continental PureContact LS, 71 vs 56 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, PureContact LS or Dynapro AS RH03?

Continental PureContact LS, 67 vs 55 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, PureContact LS or Dynapro AS RH03?

Continental PureContact LS, 70 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, PureContact LS or Dynapro AS RH03?

Continental PureContact LS, 65 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, PureContact LS or Dynapro AS RH03?

Continental PureContact LS, 68 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology