tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental PureContact LS vs Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 25 + 910 owner reviews. How we score

PureContact LS leads, 70–66 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · PureContact LS or Dynapro HT RH12 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
Tire BHankook

Dynapro HT RH12

All-Season tire

Tests – · 1 test Owners 65 · 910 reviews

“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    PureContact LS +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSDynapro HT RH12
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7367

    PureContact LS: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67

    No road tests of dry for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 73

    Wet

    PureContact LS +6
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSDynapro HT RH12
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7466

    PureContact LS: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 73

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67

    No road tests of wet for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 67

    Snow

    PureContact LS +7
    60
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSDynapro HT RH12
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6453

    PureContact LS: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 67

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 60

    No road tests of snow for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    Dynapro HT RH12 +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSDynapro HT RH12
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6166

    PureContact LS: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 65

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for PureContact LS or Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    Level
    70
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSDynapro HT RH12
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7375

    PureContact LS: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 70

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 70

    No road tests of noise for PureContact LS or Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    PureContact LS +4
    64
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSDynapro HT RH12
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)64
    Reviews found online6964

    PureContact LS: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 68

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 63.9 + 40% × 64 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 73

    Handling (owners)

    PureContact LS +8
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSDynapro HT RH12
    Reviews found online7365
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental PureContact LSHankook Dynapro HT RH12
Relative Score 70 66
Dry 71 67
Wet 73 67
Snow 67 60
Comfort 65 67
Noise 70 70
Treadwear 68 64
Handling (owners) 73 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

PureContact LS

Dynapro HT RH12

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A PureContact LS

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong wet and dry traction with reliable handling
  • Good balance of everyday comfort and long treadlife

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can lead to less responsive or wandering handling during aggressive cornering
  • Develops temporary flat spotting when parked, causing morning vibrations
  • Poor winter performance, particularly lacking traction on snow and ice despite being an all-season tire
All owner themes in the PureContact LS review

Tire B Dynapro HT RH12

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental PureContact LS

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12

Positive

Community discussions around the Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 highlight it primarily as a mid-tier, budget-conscious highway all-season option for trucks and SUVs. Drivers appreciate its quiet ride, stable tracking, and solid grip, though some note a slightly jumpy ride quality. Most mentions revolve around purchase pricing, sizing options, and comparisons to alternative all-terrain or highway tires.

f150forum.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by Bamaman This must be one of the most popular size of tires on the retail tire market. We're talking 100's to pick from. And unfortunately it's a very expensive tire size too. Yes I've noticed they are expensive! Although I realize I am not limited to just what is in stock at my nearest DiscTire, what they have now is interesting - not many in stock right now. They range from the $169 Trailfinder All Terrain, the $206.00 Cooper Discovers ATP II, the $209.00 Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, then a big jump up to the $277.00 Michelin Defender LTX M/S, and the YUGE $293.00 BFG A/T T/A KO2. I need a tire pretty much for road driving only. I do not often go out of town but for instance I've got a 9 hour trip later this month. It snows here in my area maybe..2 weeks / year, and nothing insane. So I don't really even need A/T tires in my opinion. The Hankook Dynapro seems to fit budget and looks like a good road tire. I can't tell which ones are Chinese but, sure, I'd love to avoid that too! Thanks for all the suggestions here.”
r/denverlist ·2025-12-09

“For Sale: 3X Used Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 Tire - 205/75R16C Description: 3 used Hankook Dynapro HT (RH12) highway all-season tire is available. This model is designed for vans, pickups, and sport utility vehicles, combining long treadwear, good ride comfort, and all-season traction. Brand: Hankook Model: Dynapro HT (RH12) Size: 205/75R16C Condition: Used/Part-worn. The tire has been previously used. Features: The tire features a high-grip silica compound for improved wet and dry traction and a reinforced under-tread to prevent internal damage from impacts. Price: $300 Location: South Denver, Metro area delivery for $50 Read more”
ridgelineownersclub.com ·2012-10-28

“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
Top themes
#pricing and affordability#quiet highway ride#wet and dry traction#tire comparisons#ride comfort and stability

Based on 8 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental PureContact LS B · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available—24
Rim diameters—15″ – 22″
Tread depth10/32″14/32″
UTQG700 A A—
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi40,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi54 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental PureContact LS

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12

Narrow edge: Continental PureContact LS — better handling, snow and wet. Where the Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental PureContact LS scores 73 vs 65 on handling.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental PureContact LS scores 67 vs 60 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental PureContact LS scores 73 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental PureContact LS scores 71 vs 67 on dry.

Tire A · Continental PureContact LS
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

PureContact LS or Dynapro HT RH12?

Which is better in the wet, PureContact LS or Dynapro HT RH12?

Continental PureContact LS, 73 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, PureContact LS or Dynapro HT RH12?

Continental PureContact LS, 71 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, PureContact LS or Dynapro HT RH12?

Continental PureContact LS, 67 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, PureContact LS or Dynapro HT RH12?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, PureContact LS or Dynapro HT RH12?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 67 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, PureContact LS or Dynapro HT RH12?

Continental PureContact LS, 68 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology