Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 25 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental PureContact LS vs Vredestein Hi Trac — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 25 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Hi Trac is ahead, 75–69
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 11 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Hi Trac +675Why this score
Source PureContact LS Hi Trac Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 69 79 PureContact LS: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 69
Hi Trac: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 75
No road tests of dry for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Hi Trac. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
72
Wet
Hi Trac +779Why this score
Source PureContact LS Hi Trac Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 77 (est.) Reviews found online 72 82 PureContact LS: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72
Hi Trac: 60% × 76.7 (est.) + 40% × 81.5 = 79
No road tests of wet for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Hi Trac. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source PureContact LS Hi Trac Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) – Reviews found online 64 – PureContact LS: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.9 = 67
No road tests of snow for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
59
Comfort
Hi Trac +1069Why this score
Source PureContact LS Hi Trac Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 54 70 PureContact LS: 40% × 65.7 (est.) + 60% × 53.9 = 59
Hi Trac: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 69.8 = 69
No road tests of comfort for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Hi Trac. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
68
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source PureContact LS Hi Trac Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 70 – PureContact LS: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 68
No road tests of noise for PureContact LS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Treadwear
Hi Trac +371Why this score
Source PureContact LS Hi Trac Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 69 73 PureContact LS: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68
Hi Trac: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Hi Trac. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
69
Handling (owners)
Hi Trac +372Why this score
Source PureContact LS Hi Trac Reviews found online 69 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental PureContact LS | Vredestein Hi Trac |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 75 |
| Dry | 69 | 75 |
| Wet | 72 | 79 |
| Snow | 67 | – |
| Comfort | 59 | 69 |
| Noise | 68 | – |
| Treadwear | 68 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
PureContact LS
75
/ 100
Hi Trac
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A PureContact LS
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong wet and dry traction with reliable handling
- Good balance of everyday comfort and long treadlife
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to less responsive or wandering handling during aggressive cornering
- Develops temporary flat spotting when parked, causing morning vibrations
- Poor winter performance, particularly lacking traction on snow and ice despite being an all-season tire
Tire B Hi Trac
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and safety
- High tread longevity and durability
- Strong value for money
Cons
- Increased road noise at higher speeds
- Sensitivity to uneven road surfaces or ruts
- Limited performance on non-asphalt surfaces
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental PureContact LS | B · Vredestein Hi Trac |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 700 A A | 240 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 70,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Continental PureContact LS
75
/ 100
Vredestein Hi Trac
Winner: Vredestein Hi Trac — better comfort, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Vredestein Hi Trac rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Vredestein Hi Trac scores 69 vs 59 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Vredestein Hi Trac scores 79 vs 72 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Vredestein Hi Trac scores 75 vs 69 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Vredestein Hi Trac scores 71 vs 68 on treadwear.
Tire A · Continental PureContact LS
Tire B · Vredestein Hi Trac
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
PureContact LS or Hi Trac?
Which is better in the wet, PureContact LS or Hi Trac?
Vredestein Hi Trac, 79 vs 72 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, PureContact LS or Hi Trac?
Vredestein Hi Trac, 75 vs 69 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, PureContact LS or Hi Trac?
Vredestein Hi Trac, 69 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, PureContact LS or Hi Trac?
Vredestein Hi Trac, 71 vs 68 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology