tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental PureContact LS vs Yokohama Geolandar G900 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 25 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

PureContact LS leads, 70–66 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · PureContact LS or Geolandar G900 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    PureContact LS +3
    68
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSGeolandar G900
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7368

    PureContact LS: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71

    Geolandar G900: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 68.1 = 68

    No road tests of dry for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 73

    Wet

    PureContact LS +3
    70
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSGeolandar G900
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7471

    PureContact LS: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 73

    Geolandar G900: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 70

    No road tests of wet for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 67

    Snow

    PureContact LS +3
    64
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSGeolandar G900
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6461

    PureContact LS: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 67

    Geolandar G900: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.8 = 64

    No road tests of snow for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar G900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    Level
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSGeolandar G900
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6160

    PureContact LS: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 65

    Geolandar G900: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.3 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for PureContact LS or Geolandar G900. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSGeolandar G900
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online73–

    PureContact LS: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 70

    No road tests of noise for PureContact LS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    PureContact LS +5
    63
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSGeolandar G900
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6961

    PureContact LS: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 68

    Geolandar G900: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 60.9 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 73

    Handling (owners)

    PureContact LS +11
    62
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSGeolandar G900
    Reviews found online7362
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental PureContact LSYokohama Geolandar G900
Relative Score 70 66
Dry 71 68
Wet 73 70
Snow 67 64
Comfort 65 65
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 68 63
Handling (owners) 73 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

PureContact LS

Geolandar G900

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A PureContact LS

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong wet and dry traction with reliable handling
  • Good balance of everyday comfort and long treadlife

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can lead to less responsive or wandering handling during aggressive cornering
  • Develops temporary flat spotting when parked, causing morning vibrations
  • Poor winter performance, particularly lacking traction on snow and ice despite being an all-season tire
All owner themes in the PureContact LS review

Tire B Geolandar G900

Pros

  • Excellent all-terrain versatility including snow, gravel, and mud
  • Predictable and secure handling characteristics
  • High level of ride comfort compared to stiffer premium alternatives

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life with many reports of premature wear
  • High road noise levels, particularly on motorways
  • High price point relative to current market competitors
All owner themes in the Geolandar G900 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental PureContact LS B · Yokohama Geolandar G900
CategoryAll SeasonWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG700 A A—
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental PureContact LS

Yokohama Geolandar G900

Narrow edge: Continental PureContact LS — better handling, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Geolandar G900 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental PureContact LS scores 73 vs 62 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental PureContact LS scores 68 vs 63 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental PureContact LS scores 71 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental PureContact LS scores 73 vs 70 on wet.

Tire A · Continental PureContact LS
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G900
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

PureContact LS or Geolandar G900?

Which is better in the wet, PureContact LS or Geolandar G900?

Continental PureContact LS, 73 vs 70 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, PureContact LS or Geolandar G900?

Continental PureContact LS, 71 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, PureContact LS or Geolandar G900?

Continental PureContact LS, 67 vs 64 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, PureContact LS or Geolandar G900?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, PureContact LS or Geolandar G900?

Continental PureContact LS, 68 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology