Continental PureContact looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental PureContact vs Michelin Premier A/S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 29 + 7 owner reviews. How we score

PureContact is ahead, 71–61

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental PureContact

PureContact

All-Season Premium Touring tires

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 29 reviews

Michelin Premier A/S
Tire BMichelin

Premier A/S

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 7 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    PureContact +7
    64
    Why this score
    SourcePureContactPremier A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7262

    PureContact: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.3 = 71

    Premier A/S: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 64

    No road tests of dry for PureContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Premier A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 76

    Wet

    PureContact +8
    68
    Why this score
    SourcePureContactPremier A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 75 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7867

    PureContact: 60% × 75 (est.) + 40% × 78.4 = 76

    Premier A/S: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68

    No road tests of wet for PureContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Premier A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 64

    Snow

    PureContact +5
    59
    Why this score
    SourcePureContactPremier A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6052

    PureContact: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.3 = 64

    Premier A/S: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 51.7 = 59

    No road tests of snow for PureContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Premier A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    PureContact +8
    61
    Why this score
    SourcePureContactPremier A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6858

    PureContact: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.4 = 69

    Premier A/S: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 57.8 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for PureContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Premier A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 68

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePureContactPremier A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online72–

    PureContact: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.6 = 68

    No road tests of noise for PureContact. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    PureContact +21
    47
    Why this score
    SourcePureContactPremier A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online6934

    PureContact: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 68

    Premier A/S: 60% × 55 (est.) + 40% × 34.3 = 47

    No road tests of treadwear for PureContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Premier A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    60
    Why this score
    SourcePureContactPremier A/S
    Reviews found online–60
Scores at a glance
Continental PureContact vs Michelin Premier A/S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental PureContactMichelin Premier A/S
Relative Score 71 61
Dry 71 64
Wet 76 68
Snow 64 59
Comfort 69 61
Noise 68 –
Treadwear 68 47
Handling (owners) – 60

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

PureContact

± 8

Premier A/S

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A PureContact

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality
  • Great overall performance relative to price

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can lead to reduced cornering confidence or understeer on certain light vehicles
  • Some users perceive the sidewalls as thin and vulnerable to minor punctures
  • Occasional reports of higher-than-expected road noise on specific vehicle applications
All owner themes in the PureContact review

Tire B Premier A/S

Pros

  • Comfortable ride quality with effective bump damping
  • Predictable and precise handling in dry conditions
  • Good center-line tracking and steering feedback

Cons

  • Disappointing tread life and premature wear
  • Poor traction and confidence in snow and ice
  • Susceptibility to hydroplaning at highway speeds
All owner themes in the Premier A/S review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental PureContact B · Michelin Premier A/S
CategoryAll-Season Premium Touring tiresAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
UTQG—640 A A

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental PureContact

Michelin Premier A/S

Winner: Continental PureContact — better treadwear, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Premier A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental PureContact scores 68 vs 47 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental PureContact scores 76 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental PureContact scores 69 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental PureContact scores 71 vs 64 on dry.

Tire A · Continental PureContact
Tire B · Michelin Premier A/S

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

PureContact or Premier A/S?

Which is better in the wet, PureContact or Premier A/S?

Continental PureContact, 76 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, PureContact or Premier A/S?

Continental PureContact, 71 vs 64 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, PureContact or Premier A/S?

Continental PureContact, 64 vs 59 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, PureContact or Premier A/S?

Continental PureContact, 69 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, PureContact or Premier A/S?

Continental PureContact, 68 vs 47 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology