Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 245 reviews
“Conti Sport Contact 3's for me at the moment. Had them on for a couple of thousand and have been spot on - road holding excellent and wet driving excellent!”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 245 + 452 owner reviews. How we score
Potenza RE 71RS is ahead, 75–68
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 245 reviews
“Conti Sport Contact 3's for me at the moment. Had them on for a couple of thousand and have been spot on - road holding excellent and wet driving excellent!”
Tests 78 · 2 tests Owners 69 · 452 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (wet handling (tester's mark))
“Drove my GR86 coast to coast on pre-thrashed 200tw tires in 3.5 days AMA 2024 GR86 Premium performance package mt Bridgestone Potenza RE-71rs tires Car had 24,000ish miles and now has 27,000ish”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Sport Contact 3 | Potenza RE 71RS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests | ≈ 70 (est.) | 76 |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 92 |
Sport Contact 3: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 71
Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 76 + 40% × 92.1 = 82
No road tests of dry for Sport Contact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Sport Contact 3 | Potenza RE 71RS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests | ≈ 72 (est.) | 85 |
| Reviews found online | 73 | 67 |
Sport Contact 3: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 72
Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 85 + 40% × 66.8 = 78
No road tests of wet for Sport Contact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Sport Contact 3 | Potenza RE 71RS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 68 (est.) | 71 |
| Reviews found online | 64 | 52 |
Sport Contact 3: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 63.5 = 65
Potenza RE 71RS: 40% × 71.1 + 60% × 52.1 = 60
No road tests of comfort for Sport Contact 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Sport Contact 3 | Potenza RE 71RS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | – | 67 |
| Reviews found online | – | 63 |
Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 66.6 + 40% × 63.4 = 65
| Source | Sport Contact 3 | Potenza RE 71RS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 60 (est.) | ≈ 61 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 48 | 52 |
Sport Contact 3: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 48.3 = 55
Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 57
No road tests of treadwear for Sport Contact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE 71RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Sport Contact 3 | Potenza RE 71RS |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 68 | 86 |
| Category | Continental Sport Contact 3 | Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 75 |
| Dry | 71 | 82 |
| Wet | 72 | 78 |
| Comfort | 65 | 60 |
| Noise | – | 65 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 57 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 86 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Sport Contact 3
Potenza RE 71RS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Sport Contact 3 | Potenza RE 71RS | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #1/10 2012 EVO Max Performance Tyre Test | #1/7 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment regarding the Continental Sport Contact 3 is polarized. While several drivers praise its aesthetic appeal, ride comfort, and solid wet and dry grip, others express strong dissatisfaction with rapid tread wear, inconsistent traction across temperature ranges, and relatively high pricing compared to newer alternatives.
“Just had mine replaced. Ended up getting Contact 3's on the back, same as the front, to keep them all the same. Went to National tyres and they quoted me £518 + £6.50 valves + £11.50 balance for 2 rears. Said he'd have to do better than that, ended up paying £421 all in after a bit of haggling and they had 2 in stock.”
“Originally Posted By: edyvw Continental Sport Contact 3 What car and size? I had this tire on my '96 M3 in 245/40-17 all around on 8.5" wheels. I liked it, especially coming from the awful Kumhos and Falkens I had run before, but I remember it feeling a bit squishy for my taste. The PS2 was a better performer in every way, with only a slight NVH penalty IIRC.”
“I've got good news. SportContact 3 can be bought new in your size. I believe this is a legacy OE that is still in production. But they are 80 Euros more expensive than current PremiumContact 7 / SportContact 7 www.tyreleader.ie/car-tyres/continental/contisportcontact-3/235-45-r17-97w-805902”
Based on 38 community posts
Community sentiment toward the Bridgestone Potenza RE-71RS is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers praising its high grip levels, responsive turn-in, and improved refinement over the older RE-71R. Discussions frequently center around track and autocross setups, optimal hot tire pressures, clearance pricing, and its streetability regarding road noise and gravel pickup. Minor caveats noted include fast wear characteristic of 200tw competition tires and rotation limits stemming from an asymmetrical tread design.
“Mileage-expectancy of Bridgestone Potenza RE-71Rs? (200-rated, I think?) Forgive me I'm getting the terminology wrong, but I just bought a super dynamite NA Miata that has had a TON of incredible suspension work (mostly Flyin' Miata stuff) and the stickiest tires I have ever experienced by FAR: Potenza RE-71Rs. (Forget full measurements but they're on 15 x 7.5" inch wheels, 6UL's by 949 Racing.) And I think their life is pretty much over. I love them but I don't want to track the car; I want to drive it two hours into the country every other weekend. I want to drive through the mountains with great . . . spiritedness . . . but I don't need track-focused tires. I'd much rather have something slightly less grippy in exchange for longer tread life. The previous owner (who I've stayed in touch with) recommenced I get "300-rated" tires instead of "200-rated" tires. I don't really know what that means or how many miles I can expect from such a tire. I'm contemplating getting the Continental Extreme Contacts, but I just don't know enough about tires to know what they're like or how much ACTUAL mileage I can get----I also dont' understand 200 vs. 300 tires. Please help?”
“When I said 'they are more different than I expected,' the best way to describe that with one word is SMOOTH! These tires are smooth in all aspects. They are substantially quieter than the old 71R, maybe a 2 out of 10. After driving on two lane blacktops, I have not noticed any measurable gravel or other debris picked up at this point, definitely less than the 71R, maybe 50% reduction. Handling is the most important aspect for me personally and Bridgestone has hit a home run! Stopping fantastic and according to Bridgestone they are better on wet roads, IDK as I try to avoid driving in the rain. Steering is amazing and more sensitive! There is even a level of comfort that I did not expect for performance tires. Honestly, I am unable to come up with any negative. Five Stars! The post by jst2878 was spot on about them being a 'gift!' After break in greater than 300 miles, they just need to be hammered! After doing so yesterday, I have returned home for Pina Coladas & Pool this weekend!”
“Drove my GR86 coast to coast on pre-thrashed 200tw tires in 3.5 days AMA 2024 GR86 Premium performance package mt Bridgestone Potenza RE-71rs tires Car had 24,000ish miles and now has 27,000ish”
Based on 33 community posts
| Attribute | A · Continental Sport Contact 3 | B · Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 22 | 10 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 15″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | — | 7/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 2 | 2 |
Continental Sport Contact 3
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
Winner: Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Continental Sport Contact 3 if comfort matters most to you.
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 86 vs 68 on handling.
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 82 vs 71 on dry.
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 78 vs 72 on wet.
Continental Sport Contact 3 scores 65 vs 60 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS, 78 vs 72 on our wet score.
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS, 82 vs 71 on our dry score.
Continental Sport Contact 3, 65 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Neither, by our numbers: 55 vs 57 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology