Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 33 reviews
Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat vs Kumho Ecsta PS71 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 33 + 8,168 owner reviews. How we score
Ecsta PS71 is ahead, 73–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 67 · 14 tests Owners 69 · 8,168 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Ecsta PS71 +975Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat Ecsta PS71 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 64 71 Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 66
Ecsta PS71: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 71 = 75
No road tests of dry for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
65
Wet
Ecsta PS71 +1984Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat Ecsta PS71 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 91 Reviews found online 64 73 Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.5 = 65
Ecsta PS71: 60% × 90.9 + 40% × 73.1 = 84
No road tests of wet for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
58
Comfort
Ecsta PS71 +1371Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat Ecsta PS71 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 48 65 Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 47.6 = 58
Ecsta PS71: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 64.8 = 71
No road tests of comfort for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison36Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat Ecsta PS71 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests – 15 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) Ecsta PS71: 60% × 15.5 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 36
No owner ratings of noise for Ecsta PS71. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
50
Treadwear
Ecsta PS71 +252Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat Ecsta PS71 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 57 (est.) 45 Reviews found online 39 63 Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 57.4 (est.) + 40% × 38.8 = 50
Ecsta PS71: 60% × 45.1 + 40% × 62.5 = 52
No road tests of treadwear for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
61
Handling (owners)
Ecsta PS71 +1071Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat Ecsta PS71 Reviews found online 61 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat | Kumho Ecsta PS71 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 73 |
| Dry | 66 | 75 |
| Wet | 65 | 84 |
| Comfort | 58 | 71 |
| Noise | – | 36 |
| Treadwear | 50 | 52 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
Ecsta PS71
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip with responsive handling
- Precise steering feedback and cornering stability
- Acts as a reliable, secure OEM choice for European sport sedans and SUVs
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short overall lifespan
- Firm, harsh ride quality that transmits impacts over rough roads and potholes
- Elevated road noise as the tires age
Tire B Ecsta PS71
Pros
- Outstanding wet weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
- High value for money compared to tier-one premium brands
- Predictable handling and solid cornering stability in both dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Noticeable road noise or droning at motorway speeds on certain vehicles
- Occasional reports of balancing difficulties or out-of-round/egg-shaped tires
- Softer sidewalls can lead to slightly vague steering response around center or tread block movement
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Kumho Ecsta PS71
Community sentiment towards the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is generally positive, with drivers viewing it as an affordable, high-value mid-range/UHP tire that performs reliably compared to premium brands. Users praise its wet grip rating, competitive pricing, and overall road manners once warmed up, though some note it provides adequate rather than top-tier grip and raise questions regarding cold performance and tread life.
“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”
“Not exactly helpful but I've got Hankook winter tyres on my 330i and they're really good. mr wilks on here recommend Kumho Ecstas a couple of times so I got a set for my MC and I've been very pleased with them. And I got a set for £400 from Black Circles! ETA My Kumho Ecstas are also PS71.”
“I've had the PS71 several years ago - it was ok, nothing spectacular. They might have changed the compound now, so it may be better. Its a good tire, I don't remember any real weaknesses, it just never felt like "yeah, this sticks like glue to the road". Edit: I just remembered - it was mediocre in the city - when the tire was not warmed up, but I reckon this is shared between most sport tires with high speed rating. Once warmed up was good.”
Based on 24 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat | B · Kumho Ecsta PS71 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 133 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 22″ |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
Kumho Ecsta PS71
Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS71 — better wet, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 84 vs 65 on wet.
Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 71 vs 58 on comfort.
Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 71 vs 61 on handling.
Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 75 vs 66 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat or Ecsta PS71?
Which is better in the wet, Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat or Ecsta PS71?
Kumho Ecsta PS71, 84 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat or Ecsta PS71?
Kumho Ecsta PS71, 75 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat or Ecsta PS71?
Kumho Ecsta PS71, 71 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat or Ecsta PS71?
Neither, by our numbers: 50 vs 52 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology