Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 30 owner reviews. How we score

Eagle F1 Directional 5 leads, 73–69 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Eagle F1 Directional 5 +3
    73
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 2 SSR Run FlatEagle F1 Directional 5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7176

    SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 70

    Eagle F1 Directional 5: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.6 = 73

    No road tests of dry for SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Directional 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 73

    Wet

    Eagle F1 Directional 5 +2
    75
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 2 SSR Run FlatEagle F1 Directional 5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online7477

    SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 73

    Eagle F1 Directional 5: 60% × 74.1 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 75

    No road tests of wet for SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Directional 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 63

    Comfort

    Eagle F1 Directional 5 +6
    69
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 2 SSR Run FlatEagle F1 Directional 5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6170

    SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 60.5 = 63

    Eagle F1 Directional 5: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 69.7 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Directional 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 63

    Treadwear

    Eagle F1 Directional 5 +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 2 SSR Run FlatEagle F1 Directional 5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6167

    SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 63

    Eagle F1 Directional 5: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Directional 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Eagle F1 Directional 5 +7
    78
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 2 SSR Run FlatEagle F1 Directional 5
    Reviews found online7178
Scores at a glance
Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental SportContact 2 SSR Run FlatGoodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5
Relative Score 69 73
Dry 70 73
Wet 73 75
Comfort 63 69
Treadwear 63 67
Handling (owners) 71 78

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat

± 8

Eagle F1 Directional 5

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat

Pros

  • Strong wet and dry traction performance
  • Improved ride comfort compared to competing run-flat brands
  • Respectable tread longevity for some users

Cons

  • Tendency for uneven tread wear
  • Increased road noise as the tire ages
  • Harsh ride quality on low-profile, staggered setups
All owner themes in the SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat review

Tire B Eagle F1 Directional 5

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet grip, often inspiring confidence in wet conditions
  • High value for money and lower price point compared to premium alternatives
  • Strong steering response and exceptional road feedback/feel

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls reported by several users, which can affect heavier vehicles or require higher PSI
  • Increased road noise and harsh ride quality noted by some drivers
  • Can feel slightly 'greasy' or lose peak performance during prolonged hard driving
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Directional 5 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat

Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5

Narrow edge: Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5 scores 78 vs 71 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5 scores 69 vs 63 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5 scores 67 vs 63 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5 scores 73 vs 70 on dry.

Tire A · Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat or Eagle F1 Directional 5?

Which is better in the wet, SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat or Eagle F1 Directional 5?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 75 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat or Eagle F1 Directional 5?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5, 73 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat or Eagle F1 Directional 5?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5, 69 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat or Eagle F1 Directional 5?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5, 67 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology