Tests 85 · 12 tests Owners 53 · 675 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2021 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test (noise)
“70k on SC6 ? Mine lasted 17k and now since I have the SC7 they overpassed the 6 without problems. They are better.”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 12 + 1 road tests and 675 + 1,813 owner reviews. How we score
SportContact 6 leads, 72–68 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 85 · 12 tests Owners 53 · 675 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2021 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test (noise)
“70k on SC6 ? Mine lasted 17k and now since I have the SC7 they overpassed the 6 without problems. They are better.”
Tests 76 · 1 test Owners 60 · 1,813 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test (noise)
“Pirelli cinturato P7 and Pirelli Powergy Hi all 👋🏼 So I had 4 Pirelli Cinturato P7’s on my Ford Focus ST. I got a flat tire (front left) while I was on vacation so I decided to get 2 new tires at the front. I asked the guy at the tire shop to get the same tires (so the Pirelli Cinturato’s). He got me Pirelli Powergy’s instead… He didn’t really speak English and there was not time as I was driving home the next day. So I just accepted it. Now my question is what’s the main difference between these tires? And does it matter I got 2 different tires now? (2 powergy’s at the front and 2 Cinturato’s at the back) Thanks!🙏🏼”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | SportContact 6 | Powergy |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 1 tests | 90 | 77 |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 62 |
SportContact 6: 60% × 89.6 + 40% × 72.4 = 83
Powergy: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 62 = 71
| Source | SportContact 6 | Powergy |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 1 tests | 88 | 76 |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 65 |
SportContact 6: 60% × 87.9 + 40% × 68.7 = 80
Powergy: 60% × 75.7 + 40% × 64.9 = 71
| Source | SportContact 6 | Powergy |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 52 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 14 | – |
SportContact 6: 60% × 52.5 (est.) + 40% × 13.8 = 37
No road tests of snow for SportContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | SportContact 6 | Powergy |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 1 tests | 72 | 74 |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 56 |
SportContact 6: 40% × 72.2 + 60% × 59.9 = 65
Powergy: 40% × 73.6 + 60% × 55.9 = 63
| Source | SportContact 6 | Powergy |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 1 tests | 74 | 79 |
| Reviews found online | 70 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
SportContact 6: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 70 = 72
Powergy: 60% × 79.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 74
No owner ratings of noise for Powergy. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | SportContact 6 | Powergy |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 53 (est.) | ≈ 61 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 28 | 52 |
SportContact 6: 60% × 52.7 (est.) + 40% × 28.3 = 43
Powergy: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 52 = 58
No road tests of treadwear for SportContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Powergy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | SportContact 6 | Powergy |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 66 | 62 |
| Source | SportContact 6 | Powergy |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 1 tests | 69 | 74 |
| Category | Continental SportContact 6 | Pirelli Powergy |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 68 |
| Dry | 83 | 71 |
| Wet | 80 | 71 |
| Snow | 37 | – |
| Comfort | 65 | 63 |
| Noise | 72 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 43 | 58 |
| Handling (owners) | 66 | 62 |
| Efficiency | 69 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
SportContact 6
Powergy
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | SportContact 6 | Powergy | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 99% #3/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 94% #4/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 90% #3/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | 93% #3/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 84% #12/15 · 2021 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test | 81% #8/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 97% #6/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 92% #4/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 100% #2/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 96% #5/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 98% #5/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | 98% #3/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 96% #4/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 97% #2/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 80% #3/10 · 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test | 93% #3/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 98% #8/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 89% #2/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 81% #5/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #4/6 2021 Sportauto Summer Tire Test for Sportcars R19 | #5/10 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community members generally praise the Continental Sport Contact 6 for its strong grip, smooth handling, and impressive wet performance. However, high tread wear is a frequent and significant complaint, with many drivers reporting poor longevity compared to successors like the SportContact 7 and competitors like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S. Additional mixed feedback notes issues such as road noise, ride stiffness, and occasional sidewall flex during aggressive cornering.
“Quote: Originally Posted by ///Bruce Do not buy the 6's. I had a set on my '18 Macan Turbo. Bald in 9,000 miles. The Macan is heavier than the C63S. But still... The other thing I noticed was going into a tight corner, the tires gave the impression they were rolling off the tread and folding under the tire. Weird sensation. Thanks for the feedback...I have read a few reviews on the Contact 6 and what your describing sounds like what everyone says in the review about the Contact 5P (tire before the Contact 6). And one review they specifically talked about the issue you described in the Contact 5P and said it no longer exist in the Contact 6...interesting. Look I am not trying to be cheap but based on Discount Tire prices after install and taxes I can save close to $300 for a set of Contact 6 vs PS4S. Heck that is almost the cost of the two front tires alone even if I don't get as many miles out of them. IDK? I may give them a shot...I figure the worse that can happen is I blow through them (like you said) in 9K miles and if so then next time I go with PS4S???”
“Back when it was released, John reported something along the lines of: “Continental says the wear issues of the SportContact 6 are resolved in the new SportContact 7, and that they should match the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S in terms of wear.” I’ve had both generations, including on the same car, and can confirm the SC6 wears much quicker than the SC7, which I’m running at the moment, BTW. I didn’t even manage to get to 20k km on either of my two AMGs with the factory-fitted SC6, so your high mileage is quite the feat IMO haha. I reckon you’ll be just fine with the SC7 with your setup (car + driving style).”
“CSC6 is excellent tire indeed and the wear is top notch, too. The only sight negatives I am aware of is poor rim protection, quite high noise and harsh ride.”
Based on 27 community posts
Community opinion on the Pirelli Powergy is largely mixed, with the tire frequently viewed as an eco/budget, mid-tier option suitable for daily driving rather than high-performance use. While some users consider it a cost-effective, fuel-efficient choice from a reputable brand, others report negative experiences including excessive highway vibrations and potential sidewall defects. A significant number of discussions also revolve around general inquiries regarding safety, longevity, and whether it can be mixed with other Pirelli models.
“Pirelli cinturato P7 and Pirelli Powergy Hi all 👋🏼 So I had 4 Pirelli Cinturato P7’s on my Ford Focus ST. I got a flat tire (front left) while I was on vacation so I decided to get 2 new tires at the front. I asked the guy at the tire shop to get the same tires (so the Pirelli Cinturato’s). He got me Pirelli Powergy’s instead… He didn’t really speak English and there was not time as I was driving home the next day. So I just accepted it. Now my question is what’s the main difference between these tires? And does it matter I got 2 different tires now? (2 powergy’s at the front and 2 Cinturato’s at the back) Thanks!🙏🏼”
“Avg 29mpg on a 2015 Mazda 3 Sport Nav 2L 165bhp, any ideas? I've had this car for about 3-4 weeks now, posted it here on this subreddit too. So far, I've done about 800 miles and my average fuel consumtion seems to be around 29mpg - 10.2L/100km. The car doesn't have its original rims, its on **MAM RS3** 18" rims with Pirelli Powergy tires 215/45/R18 (internet says these tires provide good fuel economy). On longer trips the average is about 40mpg-45mpg which still seems a bit high. My work commute is about 2 miles, and I do occasionally drive in a spirited manner. Is this okay? Thank you all!”
“Ripples in side wall Just been washing the car and found what I can only describe as ripples in the side wall of my front-right tyre. Had these fitted in June, only just noticed the ripples. The other tyres are perfect. I’ve probably done around 2,000 miles on them. Should I be concerned, and do they look like a manufacturing defect, or as a result of damage? (I’ve not hit any serious potholes that I’m aware of). These tyres are Pirelli Powergy, fitted to a Volvo XC60. Date code is 3325. Any help gratefully received. Read more”
Based on 15 community posts
| Attribute | A · Continental SportContact 6 | B · Pirelli Powergy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 97 | 87 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 24″ | 15″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 8/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 240 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 19 | 19 |
Continental SportContact 6
Pirelli Powergy
Narrow edge: Continental SportContact 6 — better dry and wet. Pick the Pirelli Powergy if treadwear and efficiency matter most to you.
Pirelli Powergy scores 58 vs 43 on treadwear.
Continental SportContact 6 scores 83 vs 71 on dry.
Continental SportContact 6 scores 80 vs 71 on wet.
Pirelli Powergy scores 74 vs 69 on efficiency.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Continental SportContact 6, 80 vs 71 on our wet score.
Continental SportContact 6, 83 vs 71 on our dry score.
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 63 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Pirelli Powergy, 58 vs 43 on our treadwear score.
Pirelli Powergy, 74 vs 69 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology