Head-to-head Updated

Continental SportContact 6 vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 12 + 11 road tests and 675 + 252 owner reviews. How we score

Proxes Sport 2 is ahead, 77–72

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental SportContact 6
± 5

Tests 85 · 12 tests Owners 53 · 675 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2021 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test (noise)

“70k on SC6 ? Mine lasted 17k and now since I have the SC7 they overpassed the 6 without problems. They are better.”

Toyo Proxes Sport 2
Tire BToyo

Proxes Sport 2

Summer

± 5

Tests 71 · 11 tests Owners 80 · 252 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Really enjoyed these Proxes Sport 2s on my Alpina over the last year - in fact they’re so good I’ve put them on the B3 too! Great value for money.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 83

    Dry

    Proxes Sport 2 +2
    85
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 6Proxes Sport 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 11 tests9089
    Reviews found online7280

    SportContact 6: 60% × 89.6 + 40% × 72.4 = 83

    Proxes Sport 2: 60% × 88.6 + 40% × 80.2 = 85

  2. 80

    Wet

    Proxes Sport 2 +3
    83
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 6Proxes Sport 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 11 tests8883
    Reviews found online6984

    SportContact 6: 60% × 87.9 + 40% × 68.7 = 80

    Proxes Sport 2: 60% × 82.6 + 40% × 83.8 = 83

  3. 37

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 6Proxes Sport 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 52 (est.)–
    Reviews found online14–

    SportContact 6: 60% × 52.5 (est.) + 40% × 13.8 = 37

    No road tests of snow for SportContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    Proxes Sport 2 +8
    73
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 6Proxes Sport 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 3 tests7271
    Reviews found online6074

    SportContact 6: 40% × 72.2 + 60% × 59.9 = 65

    Proxes Sport 2: 40% × 71 + 60% × 74.2 = 73

  5. 72

    Noise

    Level
    72
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 6Proxes Sport 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 7 tests7472
    Reviews found online7073

    SportContact 6: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 70 = 72

    Proxes Sport 2: 60% × 71.9 + 40% × 73 = 72

  6. 43

    Treadwear

    Proxes Sport 2 +13
    56
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 6Proxes Sport 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 53 (est.)41
    Reviews found online2878

    SportContact 6: 60% × 52.7 (est.) + 40% × 28.3 = 43

    Proxes Sport 2: 60% × 40.7 + 40% × 78.1 = 56

    No road tests of treadwear for SportContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 66

    Handling (owners)

    Proxes Sport 2 +15
    81
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 6Proxes Sport 2
    Reviews found online6681
  8. 69

    Efficiency

    SportContact 6 +21
    48
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 6Proxes Sport 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 8 tests6948
Scores at a glance
Continental SportContact 6 vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental SportContact 6Toyo Proxes Sport 2
Relative Score 72 77
Dry 83 85
Wet 80 83
Snow 37 –
Comfort 65 73
Noise 72 72
Treadwear 43 56
Handling (owners) 66 81
Efficiency 69 48

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

SportContact 6

± 5

Proxes Sport 2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategorySportContact 6Proxes Sport 2ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 99% #3/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test 95% #14/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 97% #5/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test 95% #7/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers – Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 90% #3/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test 97% #5/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers – Different tests
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 84% #12/15 · 2021 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 97% #6/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test 95% #5/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 100% #2/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test 85% #19/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? – Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 98% #5/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test 96% #6/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 96% #4/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test 97% #5/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers – Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 89% #4/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test 97% #4/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 80% #3/10 · 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test 99% #2/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers – Different tests
Noise Noise 98% #8/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test 99% #5/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 89% #2/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test 90% #5/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 51% #6/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test 73% #7/13 · 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #4/6 2021 Sportauto Summer Tire Test for Sportcars R19 #16/50 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SportContact 6

Pros

  • Staggering grip in both dry and wet conditions
  • Precise steering feedback and sharp cornering response
  • Low road noise and enhanced ride comfort compared to some rivals

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear leading to a short lifespan (often requiring replacement under 10,000-15,000 miles)
  • Reduced performance and potential snap oversteer in cold or freezing weather conditions
  • High cost per mile due to fast wear rates
All owner themes in the SportContact 6 review

Tire B Proxes Sport 2

Pros

  • Exceptional grip in both dry and wet conditions
  • High value for money compared to premium competitors like Michelin and Continental
  • Precise steering response and predictable handling

Cons

  • Faster than average treadwear or short mileage lifespan reported by some drivers
  • Higher road noise levels noted on certain wider sizes or as the tire wears
  • Slightly reduced traction in cold or heavy standing water once the tread wears down
All owner themes in the Proxes Sport 2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental SportContact 6

Mixed

Community members generally praise the Continental Sport Contact 6 for its strong grip, smooth handling, and impressive wet performance. However, high tread wear is a frequent and significant complaint, with many drivers reporting poor longevity compared to successors like the SportContact 7 and competitors like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S. Additional mixed feedback notes issues such as road noise, ride stiffness, and occasional sidewall flex during aggressive cornering.

mbworld.org

“Quote: Originally Posted by ///Bruce Do not buy the 6's. I had a set on my '18 Macan Turbo. Bald in 9,000 miles. The Macan is heavier than the C63S. But still... The other thing I noticed was going into a tight corner, the tires gave the impression they were rolling off the tread and folding under the tire. Weird sensation. Thanks for the feedback...I have read a few reviews on the Contact 6 and what your describing sounds like what everyone says in the review about the Contact 5P (tire before the Contact 6). And one review they specifically talked about the issue you described in the Contact 5P and said it no longer exist in the Contact 6...interesting. Look I am not trying to be cheap but based on Discount Tire prices after install and taxes I can save close to $300 for a set of Contact 6 vs PS4S. Heck that is almost the cost of the two front tires alone even if I don't get as many miles out of them. IDK? I may give them a shot...I figure the worse that can happen is I blow through them (like you said) in 9K miles and if so then next time I go with PS4S???”

r/TyreReviews ·4 upvotes ·2026-05-12

“Back when it was released, John reported something along the lines of: “Continental says the wear issues of the SportContact 6 are resolved in the new SportContact 7, and that they should match the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S in terms of wear.” I’ve had both generations, including on the same car, and can confirm the SC6 wears much quicker than the SC7, which I’m running at the moment, BTW. I didn’t even manage to get to 20k km on either of my two AMGs with the factory-fitted SC6, so your high mileage is quite the feat IMO haha. I reckon you’ll be just fine with the SC7 with your setup (car + driving style).”

f30.bimmerpost.com

“CSC6 is excellent tire indeed and the wear is top notch, too. The only sight negatives I am aware of is poor rim protection, quite high noise and harsh ride.”

Top themes
#rapid tread wear#strong wet performance#dry grip and handling#comparison to Michelin PS4S#longevity versus SportContact 7#road noise and comfort#cornering and sidewall stiffness

Based on 27 community posts

Tire B

Toyo Proxes Sport 2

Mixed

Community discussions regarding the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 are relatively limited due to it being a newly released tire, with many users asking for comparisons against established premium options. Owners generally report positive impressions regarding value for money and performance, though some express concerns over faster-than-expected treadwear. Additionally, frequent naming confusion occurs across automotive forums where 'PS2' references the legacy Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 rather than the Toyo Proxes Sport 2.

mbworld.org

“Had conti 2's on my audi s4 and they were downright terrible. Traction was good for about a month and then they just got loud and sloppy. Went to the ps2's after about 15k miles and abosultely loved them. Dry traction was improved greatly as was ride comfort and noise. They only lasted 20,000 miles but well worth the investment. I've never had a good experience with any continental tire so I can't imagine the sc3's being worth a gamble as they are not cheap.”

r/TyreReviews ·2 upvotes ·2026-03-17

““Toyo Proxes Sport 2 worn out after 15k km — normal or too fast ? I’m running Toyo Proxes Sport 2 (245/45R18) on my 2022 Avalon. I’ve done about 15,000 km so far and just checked tread depth (see pic). Wear seems faster than I expected — looks like I might only get ~25–30k km total. To be fair, I do drive somewhat aggressively (hard acceleration, occasional spirited driving), but nothing crazy like track use. I’ve seen some claims online saying these tires can last up to ~60k miles (~95k km), which honestly doesn’t match what I’m experiencing at all. Wear is mostly even, maybe slightly more on the outer edges. So I wanted to ask: Is this normal lifespan for Proxes Sport 2 with spirited driving? Are these just a softer compound tire that trades lifespan for grip? I’m considering switching to Michelin Primacy for longer life and stronger sidewalls and quitness — would that make more sense for daily use? Appreciate any real-world feedback. Read more”

r/TyreReviews ·17 upvotes ·2026-08-27

“Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Really enjoyed these Proxes Sport 2s on my Alpina over the last year - in fact they’re so good I’ve put them on the B3 too! Great value for money.”

Top themes
#value for money#limited market reviews#treadwear and longevity#comparison with competitors#dry and roll grip#naming ambiguity

Based on 17 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental SportContact 6 B · Toyo Proxes Sport 2
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available97113
Rim diameters18″ – 24″17″ – 22″
Tread depth8/32″9/32″
UTQG240 A A240 AA A
Treadwear warranty—25,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure50 psi50 psi
Sizes in common5454

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental SportContact 6

Toyo Proxes Sport 2

Winner: Toyo Proxes Sport 2 — better handling, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Continental SportContact 6 if efficiency matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Continental SportContact 6 scores 69 vs 48 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo Proxes Sport 2 scores 81 vs 66 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Toyo Proxes Sport 2 scores 56 vs 43 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo Proxes Sport 2 scores 73 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental SportContact 6
Tire B · Toyo Proxes Sport 2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SportContact 6 or Proxes Sport 2?

Which is better in the wet, SportContact 6 or Proxes Sport 2?

Toyo Proxes Sport 2, 83 vs 80 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SportContact 6 or Proxes Sport 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 83 vs 85 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, SportContact 6 or Proxes Sport 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 72 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, SportContact 6 or Proxes Sport 2?

Toyo Proxes Sport 2, 73 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SportContact 6 or Proxes Sport 2?

Toyo Proxes Sport 2, 56 vs 43 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, SportContact 6 or Proxes Sport 2?

Continental SportContact 6, 69 vs 48 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology