Tests 85 · 12 tests Owners 53 · 675 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2021 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test (noise)
“70k on SC6 ? Mine lasted 17k and now since I have the SC7 they overpassed the 6 without problems. They are better.”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 12 + 11 road tests and 675 + 252 owner reviews. How we score
Proxes Sport 2 is ahead, 77–72
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 85 · 12 tests Owners 53 · 675 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2021 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test (noise)
“70k on SC6 ? Mine lasted 17k and now since I have the SC7 they overpassed the 6 without problems. They are better.”
Tests 71 · 11 tests Owners 80 · 252 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Really enjoyed these Proxes Sport 2s on my Alpina over the last year - in fact they’re so good I’ve put them on the B3 too! Great value for money.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | SportContact 6 | Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 11 tests | 90 | 89 |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 80 |
SportContact 6: 60% × 89.6 + 40% × 72.4 = 83
Proxes Sport 2: 60% × 88.6 + 40% × 80.2 = 85
| Source | SportContact 6 | Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 11 tests | 88 | 83 |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 84 |
SportContact 6: 60% × 87.9 + 40% × 68.7 = 80
Proxes Sport 2: 60% × 82.6 + 40% × 83.8 = 83
| Source | SportContact 6 | Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 52 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 14 | – |
SportContact 6: 60% × 52.5 (est.) + 40% × 13.8 = 37
No road tests of snow for SportContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | SportContact 6 | Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 3 tests | 72 | 71 |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 74 |
SportContact 6: 40% × 72.2 + 60% × 59.9 = 65
Proxes Sport 2: 40% × 71 + 60% × 74.2 = 73
| Source | SportContact 6 | Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 7 tests | 74 | 72 |
| Reviews found online | 70 | 73 |
SportContact 6: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 70 = 72
Proxes Sport 2: 60% × 71.9 + 40% × 73 = 72
| Source | SportContact 6 | Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests | ≈ 53 (est.) | 41 |
| Reviews found online | 28 | 78 |
SportContact 6: 60% × 52.7 (est.) + 40% × 28.3 = 43
Proxes Sport 2: 60% × 40.7 + 40% × 78.1 = 56
No road tests of treadwear for SportContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | SportContact 6 | Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 66 | 81 |
| Source | SportContact 6 | Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 8 tests | 69 | 48 |
| Category | Continental SportContact 6 | Toyo Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 77 |
| Dry | 83 | 85 |
| Wet | 80 | 83 |
| Snow | 37 | – |
| Comfort | 65 | 73 |
| Noise | 72 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 43 | 56 |
| Handling (owners) | 66 | 81 |
| Efficiency | 69 | 48 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
SportContact 6
Proxes Sport 2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | SportContact 6 | Proxes Sport 2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 99% #3/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 95% #14/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 97% #5/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 95% #7/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 90% #3/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | 97% #5/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers | – | Different tests |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 84% #12/15 · 2021 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 97% #6/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 95% #5/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 100% #2/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 85% #19/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | – | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 98% #5/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | 96% #6/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 96% #4/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 97% #5/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 89% #4/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | 97% #4/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 80% #3/10 · 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test | 99% #2/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 98% #8/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 99% #5/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 89% #2/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 90% #5/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 51% #6/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 73% #7/13 · 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #4/6 2021 Sportauto Summer Tire Test for Sportcars R19 | #16/50 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community members generally praise the Continental Sport Contact 6 for its strong grip, smooth handling, and impressive wet performance. However, high tread wear is a frequent and significant complaint, with many drivers reporting poor longevity compared to successors like the SportContact 7 and competitors like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S. Additional mixed feedback notes issues such as road noise, ride stiffness, and occasional sidewall flex during aggressive cornering.
“Quote: Originally Posted by ///Bruce Do not buy the 6's. I had a set on my '18 Macan Turbo. Bald in 9,000 miles. The Macan is heavier than the C63S. But still... The other thing I noticed was going into a tight corner, the tires gave the impression they were rolling off the tread and folding under the tire. Weird sensation. Thanks for the feedback...I have read a few reviews on the Contact 6 and what your describing sounds like what everyone says in the review about the Contact 5P (tire before the Contact 6). And one review they specifically talked about the issue you described in the Contact 5P and said it no longer exist in the Contact 6...interesting. Look I am not trying to be cheap but based on Discount Tire prices after install and taxes I can save close to $300 for a set of Contact 6 vs PS4S. Heck that is almost the cost of the two front tires alone even if I don't get as many miles out of them. IDK? I may give them a shot...I figure the worse that can happen is I blow through them (like you said) in 9K miles and if so then next time I go with PS4S???”
“Back when it was released, John reported something along the lines of: “Continental says the wear issues of the SportContact 6 are resolved in the new SportContact 7, and that they should match the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S in terms of wear.” I’ve had both generations, including on the same car, and can confirm the SC6 wears much quicker than the SC7, which I’m running at the moment, BTW. I didn’t even manage to get to 20k km on either of my two AMGs with the factory-fitted SC6, so your high mileage is quite the feat IMO haha. I reckon you’ll be just fine with the SC7 with your setup (car + driving style).”
“CSC6 is excellent tire indeed and the wear is top notch, too. The only sight negatives I am aware of is poor rim protection, quite high noise and harsh ride.”
Based on 27 community posts
Community discussions regarding the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 are relatively limited due to it being a newly released tire, with many users asking for comparisons against established premium options. Owners generally report positive impressions regarding value for money and performance, though some express concerns over faster-than-expected treadwear. Additionally, frequent naming confusion occurs across automotive forums where 'PS2' references the legacy Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 rather than the Toyo Proxes Sport 2.
“Had conti 2's on my audi s4 and they were downright terrible. Traction was good for about a month and then they just got loud and sloppy. Went to the ps2's after about 15k miles and abosultely loved them. Dry traction was improved greatly as was ride comfort and noise. They only lasted 20,000 miles but well worth the investment. I've never had a good experience with any continental tire so I can't imagine the sc3's being worth a gamble as they are not cheap.”
““Toyo Proxes Sport 2 worn out after 15k km — normal or too fast ? I’m running Toyo Proxes Sport 2 (245/45R18) on my 2022 Avalon. I’ve done about 15,000 km so far and just checked tread depth (see pic). Wear seems faster than I expected — looks like I might only get ~25–30k km total. To be fair, I do drive somewhat aggressively (hard acceleration, occasional spirited driving), but nothing crazy like track use. I’ve seen some claims online saying these tires can last up to ~60k miles (~95k km), which honestly doesn’t match what I’m experiencing at all. Wear is mostly even, maybe slightly more on the outer edges. So I wanted to ask: Is this normal lifespan for Proxes Sport 2 with spirited driving? Are these just a softer compound tire that trades lifespan for grip? I’m considering switching to Michelin Primacy for longer life and stronger sidewalls and quitness — would that make more sense for daily use? Appreciate any real-world feedback. Read more”
“Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Really enjoyed these Proxes Sport 2s on my Alpina over the last year - in fact they’re so good I’ve put them on the B3 too! Great value for money.”
Based on 17 community posts
| Attribute | A · Continental SportContact 6 | B · Toyo Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 97 | 113 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 24″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 8/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 240 A A | 240 AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 25,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 54 | 54 |
Continental SportContact 6
Toyo Proxes Sport 2
Winner: Toyo Proxes Sport 2 — better handling, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Continental SportContact 6 if efficiency matters most to you.
Continental SportContact 6 scores 69 vs 48 on efficiency.
Toyo Proxes Sport 2 scores 81 vs 66 on handling.
Toyo Proxes Sport 2 scores 56 vs 43 on treadwear.
Toyo Proxes Sport 2 scores 73 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Toyo Proxes Sport 2, 83 vs 80 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 83 vs 85 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 72 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Toyo Proxes Sport 2, 73 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Toyo Proxes Sport 2, 56 vs 43 on our treadwear score.
Continental SportContact 6, 69 vs 48 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology