tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental TerrainContact A/T vs General Grabber Arctic LT — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 33 + 7 owner reviews. How we score

TerrainContact A/T is ahead, 74–69

Check price on Amazon · TerrainContact A/T or Grabber Arctic LT on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental TerrainContact A/T
Tire AContinental

TerrainContact A/T

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests 74 · 2 tests Owners 74 · 33 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2025 Tire Rack All Terrain Tyre Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 77

    Dry

    TerrainContact A/T +9
    68
    Why this score
    SourceTerrainContact A/TGrabber Arctic LT
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests76≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7869

    TerrainContact A/T: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 78.4 = 77

    Grabber Arctic LT: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Grabber Arctic LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 80

    Wet

    TerrainContact A/T +6
    74
    Why this score
    SourceTerrainContact A/TGrabber Arctic LT
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests77≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online8475

    TerrainContact A/T: 60% × 77.2 + 40% × 83.5 = 80

    Grabber Arctic LT: 60% × 73.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Grabber Arctic LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 65

    Snow

    Grabber Arctic LT +5
    70
    Why this score
    SourceTerrainContact A/TGrabber Arctic LT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6170

    TerrainContact A/T: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 65

    Grabber Arctic LT: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 70

    No road tests of snow for TerrainContact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Grabber Arctic LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    TerrainContact A/T +5
    67
    Why this score
    SourceTerrainContact A/TGrabber Arctic LT
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests72≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7266

    TerrainContact A/T: 40% × 72.2 + 60% × 72.3 = 72

    Grabber Arctic LT: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 66.1 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber Arctic LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 79

    Noise

    TerrainContact A/T +13
    66
    Why this score
    SourceTerrainContact A/TGrabber Arctic LT
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests82≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7464

    TerrainContact A/T: 60% × 81.6 + 40% × 74.4 = 79

    Grabber Arctic LT: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 66

    No road tests of noise for Grabber Arctic LT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    TerrainContact A/T +3
    65
    Why this score
    SourceTerrainContact A/TGrabber Arctic LT
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests67≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7064

    TerrainContact A/T: 60% × 66.9 + 40% × 69.8 = 68

    Grabber Arctic LT: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.5 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber Arctic LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTerrainContact A/TGrabber Arctic LT
    Reviews found online74–
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental TerrainContact A/TGeneral Grabber Arctic LT
Relative Score 74 69
Dry 77 68
Wet 80 74
Snow 65 70
Comfort 72 67
Noise 79 66
Treadwear 68 65
Handling (owners) 74 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

TerrainContact A/T

± 8

Grabber Arctic LT

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A TerrainContact A/T

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality for an all-terrain tire
  • Superior wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
  • Strong on-road handling and stability during highway driving

Cons

  • Inconsistent performance on ice and packed snow
  • Limited capability in deep mud or extreme off-road terrain
  • Reports of premature tread wear in some heavy-duty or high-torque applications
All owner themes in the TerrainContact A/T review

Tire B Grabber Arctic LT

Pros

  • Strong traction on packed snow, ice and freshly fallen unplowed snow, including on steep driveways
  • Marked improvement over previous all-season, all-terrain and 'no season' tires in slippery conditions
  • Improved braking and stopping in slippery conditions

Cons

  • One reviewer would like a more aggressive tread pattern
  • Tight fit when mounting on stock Ford wheels, though no leaks were reported in cold weather
  • Cost is not criticized directly, but one reviewer notes the Michelin Latitude X-Ice was 'quite expensive', implying the General is the more budget-oriented choice
All owner themes in the Grabber Arctic LT review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental TerrainContact A/T B · General Grabber Arctic LT
CategoryAll-Terrain tireWinter
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available306
Rim diameters16″ – 22″16″ – 18″
Tread depth10 - 16/32″16/32″
UTQG680 A A - B—
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure44 - 80 psi80 psi
Sizes in common66

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental TerrainContact A/T

General Grabber Arctic LT

Winner: Continental TerrainContact A/T — better noise, dry and wet. Pick the General Grabber Arctic LT if snow matters most to you. General Grabber Arctic LT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Continental TerrainContact A/T scores 79 vs 66 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental TerrainContact A/T scores 77 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental TerrainContact A/T scores 80 vs 74 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental TerrainContact A/T scores 72 vs 67 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental TerrainContact A/T
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · General Grabber Arctic LT
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

TerrainContact A/T or Grabber Arctic LT?

Which is better in the wet, TerrainContact A/T or Grabber Arctic LT?

Continental TerrainContact A/T, 80 vs 74 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, TerrainContact A/T or Grabber Arctic LT?

Continental TerrainContact A/T, 77 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, TerrainContact A/T or Grabber Arctic LT?

General Grabber Arctic LT, 70 vs 65 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, TerrainContact A/T or Grabber Arctic LT?

Continental TerrainContact A/T, 79 vs 66 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, TerrainContact A/T or Grabber Arctic LT?

Continental TerrainContact A/T, 72 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, TerrainContact A/T or Grabber Arctic LT?

Continental TerrainContact A/T, 68 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology