Tests – · none yet Owners 50 · 7 reviews
Continental WinterContact TS 810 S vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 11 road tests and 7 + 20 owner reviews. How we score
UltraGrip Performance+ is ahead, 80–56
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 78 · 11 tests Owners 80 · 20 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test (snow traction)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
57
Dry
UltraGrip Performance+ +1572Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 810 S UltraGrip Performance+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 52 74 WinterContact TS 810 S: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 57
UltraGrip Performance+: 60% × 70.8 + 40% × 73.8 = 72
No road tests of dry for WinterContact TS 810 S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
62
Wet
UltraGrip Performance+ +2486Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 810 S UltraGrip Performance+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 87 Reviews found online 59 84 WinterContact TS 810 S: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 62
UltraGrip Performance+: 60% × 86.8 + 40% × 83.7 = 86
No road tests of wet for WinterContact TS 810 S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
51
Snow
UltraGrip Performance+ +3384Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 810 S UltraGrip Performance+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 87 Reviews found online 38 79 WinterContact TS 810 S: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 38.1 = 51
UltraGrip Performance+: 60% × 86.7 + 40% × 79.1 = 84
No road tests of snow for WinterContact TS 810 S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
58
Comfort
UltraGrip Performance+ +1977Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 810 S UltraGrip Performance+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 53 81 WinterContact TS 810 S: 40% × 65.6 (est.) + 60% × 53.2 = 58
UltraGrip Performance+: 40% × 72.1 + 60% × 80.5 = 77
No road tests of comfort for WinterContact TS 810 S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison59Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 810 S UltraGrip Performance+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests – 55 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) UltraGrip Performance+: 60% × 54.7 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 59
No owner ratings of noise for UltraGrip Performance+. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
56
Treadwear
UltraGrip Performance+ +2177Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 810 S UltraGrip Performance+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 50 82 WinterContact TS 810 S: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 50 = 56
UltraGrip Performance+: 60% × 74 + 40% × 81.6 = 77
No road tests of treadwear for WinterContact TS 810 S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
52
Handling (owners)
UltraGrip Performance+ +2981Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 810 S UltraGrip Performance+ Reviews found online 52 81 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison77Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 810 S UltraGrip Performance+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests – 77
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental WinterContact TS 810 S | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 80 |
| Dry | 57 | 72 |
| Wet | 62 | 86 |
| Snow | 51 | 84 |
| Comfort | 58 | 77 |
| Noise | – | 59 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 77 |
| Handling (owners) | 52 | 81 |
| Efficiency | – | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
WinterContact TS 810 S
UltraGrip Performance+
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A WinterContact TS 810 S
Pros
- Comfortable and smooth ride quality compared to summer tires
- Quieter performance and lack of tramlining
- Good durability and longevity over multiple winter seasons
Cons
- Extremely poor traction and cornering grip in snow and ice conditions
- Severe wet traction issues with wheel spin during cornering acceleration
- Pronounced understeer in fast dry corners and wet conditions
Tire B UltraGrip Performance+
Pros
- Strong wet grip and resistance to aquaplaning, with several owners reporting confident cornering and no sliding in the rain
- Excellent snow traction, including deep snow, steep slopes, and cold temperatures down to about -30°C, with one owner describing the best lateral grip on snow they have experienced
- Sporty, stable handling for a winter tire, with good dry-road behavior and the ability to withstand spirited driving
Cons
- Noise is a concern for some owners, who describe a roar or sizzling on fast curves and a noisy ride in a BMW 3 Series
- Ice grip is mixed: one reviewer called it unsuitable for ice and another noted some slipping, though others found it adequate or very capable on icy slopes
- Less grip and sharpness than summer tires in dry and wet conditions, with one reviewer reporting unpredictable cornering and heavy understeer
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental WinterContact TS 810 S | B · Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 16 | 88 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Sizes in common | 13 | 13 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental WinterContact TS 810 S
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+
Winner: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ — better snow, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental WinterContact TS 810 S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ scores 84 vs 51 on snow.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ scores 81 vs 52 on handling.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ scores 86 vs 62 on wet.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ scores 77 vs 56 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
WinterContact TS 810 S or UltraGrip Performance+?
Which is better in the wet, WinterContact TS 810 S or UltraGrip Performance+?
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+, 86 vs 62 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, WinterContact TS 810 S or UltraGrip Performance+?
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+, 72 vs 57 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, WinterContact TS 810 S or UltraGrip Performance+?
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+, 84 vs 51 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, WinterContact TS 810 S or UltraGrip Performance+?
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+, 77 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, WinterContact TS 810 S or UltraGrip Performance+?
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+, 77 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology