Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 39 reviews
Continental WinterContact TS 830 P vs Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 5 road tests and 39 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
WinterContact TS 830 P leads, 73–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 66 · 5 tests Owners 73 · 5 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
WinterContact TS 830 P +1656Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 830 P Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 49 Reviews found online 75 66 WinterContact TS 830 P: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 74.9 = 72
Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 49.2 + 40% × 65.9 = 56
No road tests of dry for WinterContact TS 830 P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
77
Wet
WinterContact TS 830 P +473Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 830 P Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 76 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 80 76 WinterContact TS 830 P: 60% × 75.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 77
Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 71 + 40% × 75.7 = 73
No road tests of wet for WinterContact TS 830 P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Snow
Winter i*pike RS2 +776Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 830 P Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 68 76 WinterContact TS 830 P: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 69
Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 75.9 + 40% × 76.4 = 76
No road tests of snow for WinterContact TS 830 P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
73
Comfort
WinterContact TS 830 P +172Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 830 P Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 79 Reviews found online 75 68 WinterContact TS 830 P: 40% × 70 (est.) + 60% × 75.4 = 73
Winter i*pike RS2: 40% × 79.3 + 60% × 67.6 = 72
No road tests of comfort for WinterContact TS 830 P. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison59Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 830 P Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests – 55 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 54.7 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 59
No owner ratings of noise for Winter i*pike RS2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
72
Treadwear
Level72Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 830 P Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 75 75 WinterContact TS 830 P: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 72
Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.9 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for WinterContact TS 830 P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Winter i*pike RS2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
74
Handling (owners)
WinterContact TS 830 P +272Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 830 P Winter i*pike RS2 Reviews found online 74 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison73Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 830 P Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental WinterContact TS 830 P | Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 69 |
| Dry | 72 | 56 |
| Wet | 77 | 73 |
| Snow | 69 | 76 |
| Comfort | 73 | 72 |
| Noise | – | 59 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
WinterContact TS 830 P
Winter i*pike RS2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | WinterContact TS 830 P | Winter i*pike RS2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/9 2012 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | #6/8 2023 Studded Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A WinterContact TS 830 P
Pros
- Outstanding grip and control in deep snow, packed snow, and ice
- Excellent braking performance and stopping power in low temperatures
- Low road noise and high comfort levels compared to typical winter tires
Cons
- Occasional complaints of poor wet grip or side-slipping in corners
- Stiff sidewalls (especially on run-flat variants) can lead to a harsher ride over bumps
- Some reports of irregular or severe sawtooth wear leading to reduced cornering grip
Tire B Winter i*pike RS2
Pros
- Exceptional traction and braking on snow and ice
- Strong side grip and predictable cornering limits
- High durability with secure stud retention over multiple years
Cons
- Poor steering feedback on dry tarmac
- Noticeable understeer in dry road conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental WinterContact TS 830 P | B · Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 64 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 21″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental WinterContact TS 830 P
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2
Narrow edge: Continental WinterContact TS 830 P — better dry and wet. Pick the Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 if snow matters most to you.
Continental WinterContact TS 830 P scores 72 vs 56 on dry.
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 scores 76 vs 69 on snow.
Continental WinterContact TS 830 P scores 77 vs 73 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
WinterContact TS 830 P or Winter i*pike RS2?
Which is better in the wet, WinterContact TS 830 P or Winter i*pike RS2?
Continental WinterContact TS 830 P, 77 vs 73 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, WinterContact TS 830 P or Winter i*pike RS2?
Continental WinterContact TS 830 P, 72 vs 56 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, WinterContact TS 830 P or Winter i*pike RS2?
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2, 76 vs 69 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, WinterContact TS 830 P or Winter i*pike RS2?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 72 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, WinterContact TS 830 P or Winter i*pike RS2?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 72 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology