Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 38 reviews
Continental WinterContact TS 830 P vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 18 road tests and 38 + 30 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Alpin 5 is ahead, 87–72
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 90 · 18 tests Owners 82 · 30 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 31 in 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test (dry braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
Pilot Alpin 5 +1688Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 830 P Pilot Alpin 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 91 Reviews found online 74 84 WinterContact TS 830 P: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 72
Pilot Alpin 5: 60% × 91.1 + 40% × 83.7 = 88
No road tests of dry for WinterContact TS 830 P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
77
Wet
Pilot Alpin 5 +1491Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 830 P Pilot Alpin 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests ≈ 75 (est.) 94 Reviews found online 79 86 WinterContact TS 830 P: 60% × 75.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.9 = 77
Pilot Alpin 5: 60% × 93.5 + 40% × 86.4 = 91
No road tests of wet for WinterContact TS 830 P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
68
Snow
Pilot Alpin 5 +1987Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 830 P Pilot Alpin 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 17 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 94 Reviews found online 66 78 WinterContact TS 830 P: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 68
Pilot Alpin 5: 60% × 93.7 + 40% × 77.7 = 87
No road tests of snow for WinterContact TS 830 P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
73
Comfort
Pilot Alpin 5 +578Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 830 P Pilot Alpin 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 80 Reviews found online 75 77 WinterContact TS 830 P: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 75 = 73
Pilot Alpin 5: 40% × 79.5 + 60% × 76.8 = 78
No road tests of comfort for WinterContact TS 830 P. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison85Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 830 P Pilot Alpin 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests – 97 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) Pilot Alpin 5: 60% × 96.5 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 85
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Alpin 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
71
Treadwear
Pilot Alpin 5 +1384Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 830 P Pilot Alpin 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 84 Reviews found online 74 82 WinterContact TS 830 P: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 73.5 = 71
Pilot Alpin 5: 60% × 84.4 + 40% × 82.3 = 84
No road tests of treadwear for WinterContact TS 830 P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
72
Handling (owners)
Pilot Alpin 5 +1385Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 830 P Pilot Alpin 5 Reviews found online 72 85 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison74Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 830 P Pilot Alpin 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests – 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental WinterContact TS 830 P | Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 87 |
| Dry | 72 | 88 |
| Wet | 77 | 91 |
| Snow | 68 | 87 |
| Comfort | 73 | 78 |
| Noise | – | 85 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 84 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 85 |
| Efficiency | – | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
WinterContact TS 830 P
Pilot Alpin 5
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | WinterContact TS 830 P | Pilot Alpin 5 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/9 2012 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | #2/18 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A WinterContact TS 830 P
Pros
- Outstanding grip and control in deep snow, packed snow, and ice
- Excellent braking performance and stopping power in low temperatures
- Low road noise and high comfort levels compared to typical winter tires
Cons
- Occasional complaints of poor wet grip or side-slipping in corners
- Stiff sidewalls (especially on run-flat variants) can lead to a harsher ride over bumps
- Some reports of irregular or severe sawtooth wear leading to reduced cornering grip
Tire B Pilot Alpin 5
Pros
- Outstanding dry and wet grip and handling, feeling similar to a UHP summer tire
- Great snow traction and stability for mountain driving and aggressive winter cornering
- Excellent steering response and high feedback compared to traditional winter tires
Cons
- Subpar performance and braking on pure ice or severe slush
- Stiffer sidewalls can lead to a firmer, sometimes bumpy ride quality and transfer road imperfections
- Fuel economy can be negatively impacted
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental WinterContact TS 830 P | B · Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 64 | 81 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 21″ | 16″ – 23″ |
| Sizes in common | 23 | 23 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental WinterContact TS 830 P
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
Winner: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 — better snow, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 scores 87 vs 68 on snow.
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 scores 88 vs 72 on dry.
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 scores 91 vs 77 on wet.
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 scores 84 vs 71 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
WinterContact TS 830 P or Pilot Alpin 5?
Which is better in the wet, WinterContact TS 830 P or Pilot Alpin 5?
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5, 91 vs 77 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, WinterContact TS 830 P or Pilot Alpin 5?
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5, 88 vs 72 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, WinterContact TS 830 P or Pilot Alpin 5?
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5, 87 vs 68 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, WinterContact TS 830 P or Pilot Alpin 5?
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5, 78 vs 73 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, WinterContact TS 830 P or Pilot Alpin 5?
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5, 84 vs 71 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology