Head-to-head Updated

Cooper Evolution Tour vs Mastercraft SRT Touring — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 674 + 19 owner reviews. How we score

Evolution Tour is ahead, 68–56

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Cooper Evolution Tour
Tire ACooper

Evolution Tour

All-Season tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 674 reviews

“I have Cooper Evolution Tours on my Equinox. No major complaints, but would probably move up to the Discoverer line in the future. The Evolution Tours ride nice and are very quiet, but there is no way they will go 65,000 miles as indicated by Cooper. I have just about 17,000 miles on them, and they are already down to 6/32 on all four despite rotating them every 5,000-7,000 miles. Next time I get tires I want to try one of the new "severe weather rated" tires. Considering either the Cooper Discoverer Enduramax or Falken Wildpeak A/T Trail.”

Mastercraft SRT Touring

SRT Touring

All-Season tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 19 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Evolution Tour +11
    58
    Why this score
    SourceEvolution TourSRT Touring
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6953

    Evolution Tour: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 69

    SRT Touring: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 53.3 = 58

    No road tests of dry for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for SRT Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 72

    Wet

    Evolution Tour +14
    58
    Why this score
    SourceEvolution TourSRT Touring
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online7254

    Evolution Tour: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 72

    SRT Touring: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 54 = 58

    No road tests of wet for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for SRT Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 58

    Snow

    Evolution Tour +7
    51
    Why this score
    SourceEvolution TourSRT Touring
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online5039

    Evolution Tour: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 49.7 = 58

    SRT Touring: 60% × 58.9 (est.) + 40% × 39.1 = 51

    No road tests of snow for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for SRT Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    Evolution Tour +15
    53
    Why this score
    SourceEvolution TourSRT Touring
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6845

    Evolution Tour: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 67.8 = 68

    SRT Touring: 40% × 64.7 (est.) + 60% × 44.9 = 53

    No road tests of comfort for Evolution Tour or SRT Touring. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 68

    Noise

    Evolution Tour +3
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEvolution TourSRT Touring
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7062

    Evolution Tour: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 68

    SRT Touring: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65

    No road tests of noise for Evolution Tour or SRT Touring. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    Evolution Tour +16
    53
    Why this score
    SourceEvolution TourSRT Touring
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online7244

    Evolution Tour: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 71.6 = 69

    SRT Touring: 60% × 58.5 (est.) + 40% × 44.4 = 53

    No road tests of treadwear for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for SRT Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 68

    Handling (owners)

    Evolution Tour +17
    51
    Why this score
    SourceEvolution TourSRT Touring
    Reviews found online6851
Scores at a glance
Cooper Evolution Tour vs Mastercraft SRT Touring: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryCooper Evolution TourMastercraft SRT Touring
Relative Score 68 56
Dry 69 58
Wet 72 58
Snow 58 51
Comfort 68 53
Noise 68 65
Treadwear 69 53
Handling (owners) 68 51

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Evolution Tour

± 8

SRT Touring

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Evolution Tour

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price point
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong wet-weather traction and water displacement

Cons

  • Tread life often fails to meet mileage warranty expectations
  • Inconsistent noise levels reported by some users
  • Potential for premature wear compared to premium competitors like Michelin
All owner themes in the Evolution Tour review

Tire B SRT Touring

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Solid dry road handling and steering response

Cons

  • Inconsistent wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
  • Reports of premature tread wear in some instances
  • Hard rubber compound can transmit road imperfections
All owner themes in the SRT Touring review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Cooper Evolution Tour

Mixed

Community members report that the Cooper Evolution Tour provides a quiet and comfortable ride that compares favorably to some OEM tires. However, multiple users note disappointment with the actual tread life, observing significantly faster wear than the advertised 65,000-mile rating.

Top themes
#Quiet and comfortable ride#Faster than expected wear#Affordable availability#Good OEM alternative#Disappointing tread life#Desire for higher performance

Based on 6 community posts

Tire B

Mastercraft SRT Touring

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Cooper Evolution Tour B · Mastercraft SRT Touring
CategoryAll-Season tireAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—20
Rim diameters—15″ – 18″
Tread depth10/32″9/32″
UTQG580 - 600 A A - B600 A B
Treadwear warranty—65,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Cooper Evolution Tour

Mastercraft SRT Touring

Winner: Cooper Evolution Tour — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Mastercraft SRT Touring rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Cooper Evolution Tour scores 68 vs 51 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Cooper Evolution Tour scores 69 vs 53 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Cooper Evolution Tour scores 68 vs 53 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Cooper Evolution Tour scores 72 vs 58 on wet.

Tire A · Cooper Evolution Tour
Tire B · Mastercraft SRT Touring

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Evolution Tour or SRT Touring?

Which is better in the wet, Evolution Tour or SRT Touring?

Cooper Evolution Tour, 72 vs 58 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Evolution Tour or SRT Touring?

Cooper Evolution Tour, 69 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Evolution Tour or SRT Touring?

Cooper Evolution Tour, 58 vs 51 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Evolution Tour or SRT Touring?

Cooper Evolution Tour, 68 vs 65 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Evolution Tour or SRT Touring?

Cooper Evolution Tour, 68 vs 53 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Evolution Tour or SRT Touring?

Cooper Evolution Tour, 69 vs 53 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology