Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop All Season 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 11 + 32 road tests and 526 + 21,641 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate 2 is ahead, 87–69

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dunlop All Season 2
Tire ADunlop

All Season 2

All Season

± 5

Tests 76 · 11 tests Owners 61 · 526 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 (snow traction)

“Yea, but the point of the video is the full set up options for the I3S, 20 inch wheel, then the number of options is now 2; Ecopia or Donlup all season 2 - or is there others? From what I found, there are two people posted, one on FB and one in Denmark on a comment on general review of the Donlups all season 2 tire, reporting satisfactory; that they are quiet, efficient as the original and smooth to drive - and from the tire in other dimensions - I read that wear is on the low side.. -Enough for me to feel confident and will most likely buy this alternative over square setup - and most definitely over the Ecopia...”

Michelin CrossClimate 2
Tire BMichelin

CrossClimate 2

All Season

± 4

Tests 87 · 32 tests Owners 87 · 21,641 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 35 in 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout (dry braking)

“I have 60K miles on my 2019 Model X. The General is my 3rd set of tires, replacing the Michelin Cross Climate 2 that was on the car. In 200 miles, here is what I have learned so far with these General G-Max AS-07 Noise = The General is FAR superior than the Michelin Cross Climate. Matter of fact, the General is very close to the OEM Conti in this area Range = The General is running around 5% more in terms of efficiency (or lack of) compare to the OEM Conti and worn Michelin, but 5-10% more than my Michelin NEW. I only started getting the efficiency on the Michelin when the inside turned bald. Comfort = The ride is on par with the Michelin and OEM Conti, none really rode that great to begin with. Michelin was probably the best, the General is probably the worst but it isn't anything terrible. Performance = Sorry it is a Model X and it is my daily driver. I don't drive it hard enough to have any thoughts on it. Price = The General is less than $800 after rebate, Michelin and Conti are probably over $1500 at this point.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 4 tests that measured dry braking for both, All Season 2 won 0 and CrossClimate 2 won 4 (average 88% vs 98% of the best).
  • In 4 tests that measured wet braking for both, All Season 2 won 0 and CrossClimate 2 won 4 (average 89% vs 91% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured straight aquaplaning for both, All Season 2 won 0 and CrossClimate 2 won 3 (average 93% vs 95% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured snow braking for both, All Season 2 won 1 and CrossClimate 2 won 2 (average 98% vs 98% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured snow traction for both, All Season 2 won 1 and CrossClimate 2 won 2 (average 97% vs 98% of the best).
  1. 57

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 +38
    95
    Why this score
    SourceAll Season 2CrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 30 tests5799
    Reviews found online5788
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 0–488%98%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–198%98%

    All Season 2: 60% × 57 + 40% × 56.5 = 57

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 99.3 + 40% × 88.2 = 95

  2. 75

    Wet

    CrossClimate 2 +11
    86
    Why this score
    SourceAll Season 2CrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 30 tests8283
    Reviews found online6691
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–091%90%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–393%95%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 0–489%91%
    Wet Braking (concrete) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–191%95%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–096%96%

    All Season 2: 60% × 81.7 + 40% × 65.7 = 75

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 83.3 + 40% × 91.1 = 86

  3. 79

    Snow

    CrossClimate 2 +12
    91
    Why this score
    SourceAll Season 2CrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 26 tests8899
    Reviews found online6578
    Ice Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–097%95%
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–298%98%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–195%100%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–297%98%

    All Season 2: 60% × 88.5 + 40% × 65.3 = 79

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 98.7 + 40% × 78.4 = 91

  4. 65

    Comfort

    CrossClimate 2 +12
    77
    Why this score
    SourceAll Season 2CrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 3 tests7164
    Reviews found online6186

    All Season 2: 40% × 71 + 60% × 61 = 65

    CrossClimate 2: 40% × 64.2 + 60% × 86.3 = 77

  5. 66

    Noise

    CrossClimate 2 +14
    80
    Why this score
    SourceAll Season 2CrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 19 tests6678
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)83
    Noise (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–298%99%

    All Season 2: 60% × 66.1 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 66

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 77.6 + 40% × 82.6 = 80

    No owner ratings of noise for All Season 2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 77

    Treadwear

    CrossClimate 2 +7
    84
    Why this score
    SourceAll Season 2CrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 7 tests8881
    Reviews found online6088
    Abrasion (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–290%99%
    Wear (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 2–192%86%

    All Season 2: 60% × 88.2 + 40% × 59.6 = 77

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 81.2 + 40% × 87.9 = 84

  7. 51

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate 2 +31
    82
    Why this score
    SourceAll Season 2CrossClimate 2
    Reviews found online5182
  8. 85

    Efficiency

    CrossClimate 2 +5
    90
    Why this score
    SourceAll Season 2CrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 22 tests8590
    Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–297%98%
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–196%100%
Scores at a glance
Dunlop All Season 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryDunlop All Season 2Michelin CrossClimate 2
Relative Score 69 87
Dry 57 95
Wet 75 86
Snow 79 91
Comfort 65 77
Noise 66 80
Treadwear 77 84
Handling (owners) 51 82
Efficiency 85 90

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

All Season 2

± 4

CrossClimate 2

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 4 tests that ran both, Dunlop All Season 2 finished ahead 0 times and Michelin CrossClimate 2 4 times.

DisciplineCategoryAll Season 2CrossClimate 2ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 88% 98% −9.7 0–4 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15
Dry Handling Dry 98% 98% −0.6 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 91% 90% +1.8 1–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 93% 95% −1.3 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15
Wet Braking Wet 89% 91% −2.5 0–4 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15
Wet Braking (concrete) Wet 91% 95% −3.3 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15
Wet Handling Wet 96% 96% +0.6 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Ice Braking Snow 97% 95% +2.5 1–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15
Snow Braking Snow 98% 98% −0.5 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15
Snow Handling Snow 95% 100% −4.7 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Snow Traction Snow 97% 98% −1.3 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15
Noise Noise 98% 99% −0.4 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15
Abrasion Treadwear 90% 99% −8.4 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15
Wear Treadwear 92% 86% +5.6 2–1 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 97% 98% −0.6 0–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 96% 100% −3.6 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #2/15 #3/15 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Value Cost 84% 57% +26.8 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Overall Ranking Overall #10/16 #2/16 – 0–4 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A All Season 2

Pros

  • Excellent wet weather grip and confidence-inspiring traction
  • Comfortable, smooth, and relatively quiet ride quality
  • Strong performance in cold temperatures, light snow, and frost

Cons

  • Subpar handling and slight understeer on dry or warmer asphalt for spirited drivers
  • Reports of noticeable road noise and rubber dust from some users
  • Inadequate rim protection bead design
All owner themes in the All Season 2 review

Tire B CrossClimate 2

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in snow, slush, and winter weather conditions
  • Strong braking and handling performance on dry and wet pavement
  • Long-lasting tread wear and durability

Cons

  • Higher initial purchase price
  • Slight negative impact on fuel economy / EV range for some drivers
  • Potential for increased road noise or harshness as the tires wear down
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Dunlop All Season 2

Positive

The community views the Dunlop All Season 2 as a comfortable, quiet, and competitively priced tire option compared to premium brands like Continental and Michelin. Drivers report a smooth ride that absorbs road imperfections well, alongside direct and precise steering response. While some notice a very slight increase in energy consumption or rolling resistance, overall satisfaction remains high for moderate driving conditions.

Top themes
#ride comfort and smoothness#low cabin noise#steering precision and directness#competitive pricing#energy consumption and efficiency#performance in moderate conditions

Based on 7 community posts

Tire B

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Positive

The community overwhelmingly praises the Michelin CrossClimate 2 for its exceptional snow, ice, and wet-weather traction, often describing it as an ideal all-weather tire. While many drivers report a quiet, comfortable ride and solid durability, some users note potential downsides including reduced fuel or battery efficiency, road noise on certain surfaces, and premium pricing. A few commenters also point out that the tire may be overkill for regions without significant winter weather.

r/LexusNX ·55 upvotes ·2026-06-14

“CrossClimate2 in. Alenza Run Flats out. Swapped the Alenza run flats for CrossClimate2 all-weather tires. Sharper handling. Better ride comfort. Very quiet after an initial break-in period. Just make sure the tire pressure is as recommended on the door sill sticker, shop techs don’t always check. I’m an early adopter of CC2 tires, been using them on my old Jeep since 2022, super durable and perfect for inclement weather, still had some tread remaining at the 60k-mile warranty mark.”

macheforum.com ·8 upvotes ·2021-06-28

“I have the 235 that is a little higher load rating (105 vs 103 stock and 99 for 225). I'm probably getting about a 10% range reduction, but worth it to me for the improved handling and lower braking distance. I work from home and I charge to 90% about once a week unless taking a longer drive. If I did a lot of longer trips it might be an issue, but I am very happy with these tires.”

r/volt ·8 upvotes ·2026-09-18

“Michelin CrossClimate2 efficiency surprisingly good! Just put in a new set of Michelin CrossClimate2s to go along with a move from LA to New England. I was a bit worried about the mileage/range hit but figured the safety in the winter outweighed it. I'm pleasantly surprised! On an all-highway trip from Boston to New Jersey, gas MPG was a steady 42 mpgs and I got about 45 miles on the battery, although I drive like a grandma at the posted speed limits so I think I was close to 44 mpg/45 EV miles on the old OEM tires. Around town in suburbia in good weather I'm still running between 4.0-5.0 miles/kWh. I estimate, at worst, a 5% drop in efficiency. Pretty good considering the Michelins feel so much stickier!”

Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Wet handling and hydroplaning#Road noise and comfort#Fuel economy and range#Tread wear and longevity#Premium price point#Directional tread design

Based on 762 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop All Season 2 B · Michelin CrossClimate 2
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available7392
Rim diameters14″ – 20″15″ – 21″
Tread depth—9 - 10/32″
UTQG—640 B A
Treadwear warranty—60,000 mi
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi
Sizes in common4949

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop All Season 2

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 — better dry, handling and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 95 vs 57 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 82 vs 51 on handling.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 80 vs 66 on noise.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 91 vs 79 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wear

Dunlop All Season 2 won 2 of 3 shared wear tests.

Tire A · Dunlop All Season 2
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate 2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

All Season 2 or CrossClimate 2?

Which is better in the wet, All Season 2 or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 86 vs 75 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, All Season 2 or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 95 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, All Season 2 or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 91 vs 79 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, All Season 2 or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 80 vs 66 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, All Season 2 or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 77 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, All Season 2 or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 84 vs 77 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, All Season 2 or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 90 vs 85 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology