Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 12 reviews
Dunlop Direzza 03G vs Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 12 + 186 owner reviews. How we score
DynaPro A/TM RF10 is ahead, 73–65
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 186 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +173Why this score
Source Direzza 03G DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 75 77 Direzza 03G: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 72
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73
No road tests of dry for Direzza 03G. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
64
Wet
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +1074Why this score
Source Direzza 03G DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 62 75 Direzza 03G: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 61.9 = 64
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74
No road tests of wet for Direzza 03G. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison65Why this score
Source Direzza 03G DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 62 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65
No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
62
Comfort
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +1072Why this score
Source Direzza 03G DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 55 75 Direzza 03G: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 54.9 = 62
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72
No road tests of comfort for Direzza 03G or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison70Why this score
Source Direzza 03G DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 73 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70
No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
50
Treadwear
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +2171Why this score
Source Direzza 03G DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 39 75 Direzza 03G: 60% × 57.5 (est.) + 40% × 39.2 = 50
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for Direzza 03G. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
73
Handling (owners)
Direzza 03G +271Why this score
Source Direzza 03G DynaPro A/TM RF10 Reviews found online 73 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Dunlop Direzza 03G | Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 73 |
| Dry | 72 | 73 |
| Wet | 64 | 74 |
| Snow | – | 65 |
| Comfort | 62 | 72 |
| Noise | – | 70 |
| Treadwear | 50 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 73 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Direzza 03G
DynaPro A/TM RF10
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Direzza 03G | DynaPro A/TM RF10 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/6 2013 Auto Bild Track Day Semi Slick Tyre Test | #4/5 2019 4x4 Australia All-Terrain Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Direzza 03G
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and handling performance
- Highly communicative feedback and steering response
- Progressive breakaway characteristics at the limit
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Reports of sidewall disintegration or failure under extreme stress
- High noise levels during road use
Tire B DynaPro A/TM RF10
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
- Strong value proposition and competitive pricing
Cons
- Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
- Potential for increased fuel consumption
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Dunlop Direzza 03G | B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 29 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 13/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 560 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Outlined White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Dunlop Direzza 03G
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Winner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better treadwear, wet and comfort. Where the Dunlop Direzza 03G is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Dunlop Direzza 03G rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 50 on treadwear.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 64 on wet.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 72 vs 62 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Direzza 03G or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Which is better in the wet, Direzza 03G or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 64 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Direzza 03G or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 73 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Direzza 03G or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Direzza 03G or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 50 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology