Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport FM800 vs LingLong Sport Master 4S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 7 road tests and 63 + 0 owner reviews. How we score

SP Sport FM800 leads, 76–74 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

LingLong Sport Master 4S
Tire BLingLong

Sport Master 4S

All Season

± 7

Tests 66 · 7 tests Owners – · none yet

Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2025 Autobild SUV All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Sport Master 4S +9
    84
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800Sport Master 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests≈ 72 (est.)89
    Reviews found online78≈ 77 (est.)

    SP Sport FM800: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 78.1 = 75

    Sport Master 4S: 60% × 89.3 + 40% × 76.7 (est.) = 84

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No owner ratings of dry for Sport Master 4S. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 79

    Wet

    SP Sport FM800 +2
    77
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800Sport Master 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests≈ 77 (est.)78
    Reviews found online82≈ 75 (est.)

    SP Sport FM800: 60% × 76.8 (est.) + 40% × 81.8 = 79

    Sport Master 4S: 60% × 78.1 + 40% × 74.7 (est.) = 77

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No owner ratings of wet for Sport Master 4S. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    41
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800Sport Master 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests–30
    Reviews found online–≈ 58 (est.)

    Sport Master 4S: 60% × 30 + 40% × 57.6 (est.) = 41

    No owner ratings of snow for Sport Master 4S. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 73

    Comfort

    SP Sport FM800 +3
    70
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800Sport Master 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 70 (est.)71
    Reviews found online76≈ 69 (est.)

    SP Sport FM800: 40% × 70 (est.) + 60% × 75.6 = 73

    Sport Master 4S: 40% × 70.7 + 60% × 69.1 (est.) = 70

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No owner ratings of comfort for Sport Master 4S. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800Sport Master 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests–66
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    Sport Master 4S: 60% × 66 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 66

    No owner ratings of noise for Sport Master 4S. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    SP Sport FM800 +17
    55
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800Sport Master 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 70 (est.)51
    Reviews found online76≈ 61 (est.)

    SP Sport FM800: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.7 = 72

    Sport Master 4S: 60% × 50.6 + 40% × 60.8 (est.) = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No owner ratings of treadwear for Sport Master 4S. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 79

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800Sport Master 4S
    Reviews found online79–
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    39
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800Sport Master 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests–39
Scores at a glance
Dunlop SP Sport FM800 vs LingLong Sport Master 4S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryDunlop SP Sport FM800LingLong Sport Master 4S
Relative Score 76 74
Dry 75 84
Wet 79 77
Snow – 41
Comfort 73 70
Noise – 66
Treadwear 72 55
Handling (owners) 79 –
Efficiency – 39

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

SP Sport FM800

± 7

Sport Master 4S

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport FM800

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction with strong anti-aquaplaning capabilities
  • High value for money compared to premium brands like Michelin and Bridgestone
  • Low road noise and very quiet, smooth ride quality

Cons

  • Faster than average tread wear reported by some drivers
  • Rubber compound can harden over time, leading to reduced performance as the tire ages
  • Softer sidewalls can occasionally result in slightly less precise steering feel
All owner themes in the SP Sport FM800 review

Tire B Sport Master 4S

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport FM800 B · LingLong Sport Master 4S
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—60
Rim diameters—13″ – 19″
UTQG320 B A—

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport FM800

LingLong Sport Master 4S

Narrow edge: Dunlop SP Sport FM800 — better treadwear and comfort. Pick the LingLong Sport Master 4S if dry matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 72 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

LingLong Sport Master 4S scores 84 vs 75 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 73 vs 70 on comfort.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport FM800
Tire B · LingLong Sport Master 4S

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport FM800 or Sport Master 4S?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport FM800 or Sport Master 4S?

Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 77 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport FM800 or Sport Master 4S?

LingLong Sport Master 4S, 84 vs 75 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport FM800 or Sport Master 4S?

Dunlop SP Sport FM800, 73 vs 70 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport FM800 or Sport Master 4S?

Dunlop SP Sport FM800, 72 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology