tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport LM705 vs Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 39 + 186 owner reviews. How we score

DynaPro A/TM RF10 is ahead, 71–64

Check price on Amazon · DynaPro A/TM RF10 or SP Sport LM705 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +7
    73
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6577

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 66

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 61

    Wet

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +13
    74
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online5875

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 62

    Snow

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +3
    65
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5662

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 62

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    No road tests of snow for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7075

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 70

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport LM705 or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 63

    Noise

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +7
    70
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5773

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 56.9 = 63

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    No road tests of noise for SP Sport LM705 or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +5
    71
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6675

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 66

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 64

    Handling (owners)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +7
    71
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Reviews found online6471
Scores at a glance
CategoryDunlop SP Sport LM705Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Relative Score 64 71
Dry 66 73
Wet 61 74
Snow 62 65
Comfort 70 72
Noise 63 70
Treadwear 66 71
Handling (owners) 64 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

SP Sport LM705

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport LM705

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smooth bump/pothole absorption
  • Very low road noise and quiet highway operation
  • High value for money compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Significantly compromised wet grip and poor performance in heavy rain
  • Soft sidewalls lead to mushy steering response and lack of high-speed handling feedback
  • Faster-than-expected wear reported by some users
All owner themes in the SP Sport LM705 review

Tire B DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport LM705 B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
CategorySummerAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available629
Rim diameters16″ – 19″15″ – 20″
Tread depth—13/32″
UTQG—560 A B
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallOutlined White Lettering
Max pressure—44 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport LM705

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Winner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better wet, dry and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 66 on dry.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 70 vs 63 on noise.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 64 on handling.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport LM705
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport LM705 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport LM705 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport LM705 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, SP Sport LM705 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 65 vs 62 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, SP Sport LM705 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 70 vs 63 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport LM705 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 72 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport LM705 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology