Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Touring R1 vs Michelin Energy — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 22 + 42 owner reviews. How we score

SP Touring R1 is ahead, 69–60

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Energy
Tire BMichelin

Energy

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 42 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    SP Touring R1 +14
    55
    Why this score
    SourceSP Touring R1Energy
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7048

    SP Touring R1: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 69

    Energy: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.4 = 55

    No road tests of dry for SP Touring R1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Energy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 70

    Wet

    SP Touring R1 +9
    61
    Why this score
    SourceSP Touring R1Energy
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7157

    SP Touring R1: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70

    Energy: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 61

    No road tests of wet for SP Touring R1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Energy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 68

    Comfort

    SP Touring R1 +3
    65
    Why this score
    SourceSP Touring R1Energy
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6760

    SP Touring R1: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 68

    Energy: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for SP Touring R1 or Energy. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 67

    Treadwear

    Level
    67
    Why this score
    SourceSP Touring R1Energy
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6967

    SP Touring R1: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 67

    Energy: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Touring R1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Energy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  5. 71

    Handling (owners)

    SP Touring R1 +20
    51
    Why this score
    SourceSP Touring R1Energy
    Reviews found online7151
Scores at a glance
Dunlop SP Touring R1 vs Michelin Energy: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryDunlop SP Touring R1Michelin Energy
Relative Score 69 60
Dry 69 55
Wet 70 61
Comfort 68 65
Treadwear 67 67
Handling (owners) 71 51

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

SP Touring R1

Energy

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Touring R1

Pros

  • High tread longevity and durability
  • Excellent value for money
  • Comfortable and quiet ride quality

Cons

  • Inconsistent wet-weather performance
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability
  • Occasional road noise feedback
All owner themes in the SP Touring R1 review

Tire B Energy

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
  • Low road noise and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Lack of steering feedback and road feel
  • Inconsistent or poor grip in wet conditions
  • High price point relative to competitors
All owner themes in the Energy review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Touring R1 B · Michelin Energy
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Touring R1

Michelin Energy

Winner: Dunlop SP Touring R1 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Dunlop SP Touring R1 scores 71 vs 51 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Dunlop SP Touring R1 scores 69 vs 55 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Dunlop SP Touring R1 scores 70 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Dunlop SP Touring R1 scores 68 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Touring R1
Tire B · Michelin Energy

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Touring R1 or Energy?

Which is better in the wet, SP Touring R1 or Energy?

Dunlop SP Touring R1, 70 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Touring R1 or Energy?

Dunlop SP Touring R1, 69 vs 55 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, SP Touring R1 or Energy?

Dunlop SP Touring R1, 68 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SP Touring R1 or Energy?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology