Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 22 reviews
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Dunlop SP Touring R1 vs Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 22 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
SP Touring R1 is ahead, 69–61
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 11 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
SP Touring R1 +1059Why this score
Source SP Touring R1 Aspec A349 BluEarth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 70 55 SP Touring R1: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 69
Aspec A349 BluEarth: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.5 = 59
No road tests of dry for SP Touring R1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Aspec A349 BluEarth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
70
Wet
SP Touring R1 +1159Why this score
Source SP Touring R1 Aspec A349 BluEarth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 71 55 SP Touring R1: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70
Aspec A349 BluEarth: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 55 = 59
No road tests of wet for SP Touring R1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Aspec A349 BluEarth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
68
Comfort
SP Touring R1 +662Why this score
Source SP Touring R1 Aspec A349 BluEarth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 67 54 SP Touring R1: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 68
Aspec A349 BluEarth: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 62
No road tests of comfort for SP Touring R1 or Aspec A349 BluEarth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
Level67Why this score
Source SP Touring R1 Aspec A349 BluEarth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 69 69 SP Touring R1: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 67
Aspec A349 BluEarth: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for SP Touring R1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Aspec A349 BluEarth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
71
Handling (owners)
SP Touring R1 +1061Why this score
Source SP Touring R1 Aspec A349 BluEarth Reviews found online 71 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | Dunlop SP Touring R1 | Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 61 |
| Dry | 69 | 59 |
| Wet | 70 | 59 |
| Comfort | 68 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
SP Touring R1
Aspec A349 BluEarth
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A SP Touring R1
Pros
- High tread longevity and durability
- Excellent value for money
- Comfortable and quiet ride quality
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability
- Occasional road noise feedback
Tire B Aspec A349 BluEarth
Pros
- Impressive tread life and durability for an OEM tire
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Reliable handling and lateral grip in dry conditions
Cons
- Poor traction and tendency to spin on wet surfaces
- High price point compared to aftermarket competitors
- Mediocre cornering ability and grip during aggressive maneuvers
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Dunlop SP Touring R1 | B · Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Dunlop SP Touring R1
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth
Winner: Dunlop SP Touring R1 — better wet, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Dunlop SP Touring R1 scores 70 vs 59 on wet.
Dunlop SP Touring R1 scores 69 vs 59 on dry.
Dunlop SP Touring R1 scores 71 vs 61 on handling.
Dunlop SP Touring R1 scores 68 vs 62 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
SP Touring R1 or Aspec A349 BluEarth?
Which is better in the wet, SP Touring R1 or Aspec A349 BluEarth?
Dunlop SP Touring R1, 70 vs 59 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, SP Touring R1 or Aspec A349 BluEarth?
Dunlop SP Touring R1, 69 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, SP Touring R1 or Aspec A349 BluEarth?
Dunlop SP Touring R1, 68 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, SP Touring R1 or Aspec A349 BluEarth?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology