tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Falken Azenis PT722 vs Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 10 + 93 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus V12 evo2 leads, 69–66 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Ventus V12 evo2 or Azenis PT722 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken Azenis PT722
Tire AFalken

Azenis PT722

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 10 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Ventus V12 evo2 +5
    71
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis PT722Ventus V12 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)71
    Reviews found online6571

    Azenis PT722: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 66

    Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 71.4 = 71

    No road tests of dry for Azenis PT722. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 64

    Wet

    Ventus V12 evo2 +7
    71
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis PT722Ventus V12 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)69
    Reviews found online6273

    Azenis PT722: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 62.1 = 64

    Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 69.2 + 40% × 73.2 = 71

    No road tests of wet for Azenis PT722. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 66

    Comfort

    Ventus V12 evo2 +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis PT722Ventus V12 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6566

    Azenis PT722: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 65.2 = 66

    Ventus V12 evo2: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 65.6 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Azenis PT722 or Ventus V12 evo2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    73
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis PT722Ventus V12 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–78
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 77.5 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 73

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus V12 evo2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 70

    Treadwear

    Azenis PT722 +9
    61
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis PT722Ventus V12 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7358

    Azenis PT722: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 58.4 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for Azenis PT722. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus V12 evo2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 68

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus V12 evo2 +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis PT722Ventus V12 evo2
    Reviews found online6870
Scores at a glance
CategoryFalken Azenis PT722Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
Relative Score 66 69
Dry 66 71
Wet 64 71
Comfort 66 67
Noise – 73
Treadwear 70 61
Handling (owners) 68 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Azenis PT722

± 7

Ventus V12 evo2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Azenis PT722

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low noise levels and high ride comfort
  • Excellent value for the price point

Cons

  • Unpredictable or poor traction in wet conditions
  • Lack of progressive grip when reaching traction limits
  • Inconsistent performance across different vehicle platforms
All owner themes in the Azenis PT722 review

Tire B Ventus V12 evo2

Pros

  • Excellent value and cost-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands
  • Strong, reliable grip in both dry and wet conditions with good aquaplaning resistance
  • Comfortable ride with low initial road noise

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can cause a floaty feel or roll during aggressive cornering and track use
  • Road noise increases noticeably as the tires wear down
  • Treadwear is relatively fast, leading to shorter overall mileage
All owner themes in the Ventus V12 evo2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Azenis PT722 B · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—38
Rim diameters—15″ – 21″

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken Azenis PT722

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2

Narrow edge: Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — better wet and dry. Pick the Falken Azenis PT722 if treadwear matters most to you. Falken Azenis PT722 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Falken Azenis PT722 scores 70 vs 61 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 71 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 71 vs 66 on dry.

Tire A · Falken Azenis PT722
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Azenis PT722 or Ventus V12 evo2?

Which is better in the wet, Azenis PT722 or Ventus V12 evo2?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 71 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Azenis PT722 or Ventus V12 evo2?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 71 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Azenis PT722 or Ventus V12 evo2?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 67 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Azenis PT722 or Ventus V12 evo2?

Falken Azenis PT722, 70 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology