Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 10 reviews
Falken FK451 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Falken FK451 vs Falken FK510 SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 10 + 9 owner reviews. How we score
FK510 SUV is ahead, 73–68
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
FK510 SUV +1076Why this score
Source FK451 FK510 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 82 Reviews found online 65 68 FK451: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66
FK510 SUV: 60% × 81.6 + 40% × 68.3 = 76
No road tests of dry for FK451. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
70
Wet
FK510 SUV +878Why this score
Source FK451 FK510 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 80 Reviews found online 70 74 FK451: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 70
FK510 SUV: 60% × 80.2 + 40% × 73.7 = 78
No road tests of wet for FK451. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
68
Comfort
FK451 +563Why this score
Source FK451 FK510 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 62 Reviews found online 67 64 FK451: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 68
FK510 SUV: 60% × 61.5 + 40% × 64 = 63
No road tests of comfort for FK451. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison71Why this score
Source FK451 FK510 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests – 74 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) FK510 SUV: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 71
No owner ratings of noise for FK510 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
67
Treadwear
FK451 +463Why this score
Source FK451 FK510 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 68 61 FK451: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.5 = 67
FK510 SUV: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 60.9 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for FK451. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for FK510 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
65
Handling (owners)
FK510 SUV +570Why this score
Source FK451 FK510 SUV Reviews found online 65 70
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken FK451 | Falken FK510 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 73 |
| Dry | 66 | 76 |
| Wet | 70 | 78 |
| Comfort | 68 | 63 |
| Noise | – | 71 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
FK451
FK510 SUV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A FK451
Pros
- Exceptional price-to-performance ratio
- Strong wet and dry traction
- Excellent tread life and durability
Cons
- Potential for rubber cracking between treads over long-term storage or extended age
- Some users report a slightly less 'alive' or communicative steering feel compared to premium performance tires
- Availability concerns as it is an older model often superseded by newer iterations
Tire B FK510 SUV
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to top-tier premium brands
- Quiet, compliant, and comfortable ride quality
- Strong dry and wet handling with good feedback
Cons
- Accelerated or uneven tread wear on certain vehicle setups
- Reduced fuel economy (MPG)
- Some users reported poor traction and slipping in wet or moisture conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken FK451 | B · Falken FK510 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 48 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 22″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken FK451
Falken FK510 SUV
Winner: Falken FK510 SUV — better dry and wet. Pick the Falken FK451 if comfort and treadwear matter most to you. Falken FK451 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Falken FK510 SUV scores 76 vs 66 on dry.
Falken FK510 SUV scores 78 vs 70 on wet.
Falken FK451 scores 68 vs 63 on comfort.
Falken FK451 scores 67 vs 63 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
FK451 or FK510 SUV?
Which is better in the wet, FK451 or FK510 SUV?
Falken FK510 SUV, 78 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, FK451 or FK510 SUV?
Falken FK510 SUV, 76 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, FK451 or FK510 SUV?
Falken FK451, 68 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, FK451 or FK510 SUV?
Falken FK451, 67 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology